Why do I get the feeling that this is all part of a study by KB on democracy and election processes in general? We're all rats in a maze, people, and there's no cheese for us at the end.
Anyway, can I point out that I do find it quite stupid that some people can't accept that they think Dagger is the best choice? Well, I'm going to anyway (in fact, I just did). I think he'd be shit at the job, but that's me. Others may disagree and that's their choice, not mine. This whole "why can't they give a reason" thing is pointless; most of them have.
The credentials and the supposed capabilities of all the candidates have been aired for weeks now, and as much as I loathe to use this phrase, now is the time to agree to disagree. You aren't going to win anything or prove anything by calling out Dagger voters and demanding a list of reasons which meets your criteria of whether or not it was a valid vote. They looked at the poll, made a choice, and clicked a button; unless they are an alt or something, it's a valid vote.
In closing, can we all just click a button to vote and then decide to drop this nonsense? I mean, this is me; one of the bigger voices in that JGlass thread, one of the bigger opponents to Dagger's potential modship, and here I am asking you all to, for once, grow the fuck up a little bit and stop with this shit. This applies to Dagger supporters like Sally too; you are too experienced on these boards and seemingly too intelligent than to think that a post like that wasn't going to start getting responses like Mozz's.