The Final Poll | Page 30 | WrestleZone Forums

The Final Poll

Who Should Be The Next Mod?

  • The Crock

  • Dagger Dias

  • Coco The Monkey


Results are only viewable after voting.
Of course not but you are tearing Mozzarella a new one for doing what you have been doing the whole campaign aside from the last 12 hours. Maybe you should chew on your own ass for a while if you feel that strongly about it.
 
Of course not but you are tearing Mozzarella a new one for doing what you have been doing the whole campaign aside from the last 12 hours. Maybe you should chew on your own ass for a while if you feel that strongly about it.

DirtyJosé;3665479 said:
Why do I get the feeling that this is all part of a study by KB on democracy and election processes in general? We're all rats in a maze, people, and there's no cheese for us at the end.

Anyway, can I point out that I do find it quite stupid that some people can't accept that they think Dagger is the best choice? Well, I'm going to anyway (in fact, I just did). I think he'd be shit at the job, but that's me. Others may disagree and that's their choice, not mine. This whole "why can't they give a reason" thing is pointless; most of them have.

The credentials and the supposed capabilities of all the candidates have been aired for weeks now, and as much as I loathe to use this phrase, now is the time to agree to disagree. You aren't going to win anything or prove anything by calling out Dagger voters and demanding a list of reasons which meets your criteria of whether or not it was a valid vote. They looked at the poll, made a choice, and clicked a button; unless they are an alt or something, it's a valid vote.

In closing, can we all just click a button to vote and then decide to drop this nonsense? I mean, this is me; one of the bigger voices in that JGlass thread, one of the bigger opponents to Dagger's potential modship, and here I am asking you all to, for once, grow the fuck up a little bit and stop with this shit. This applies to Dagger supporters like Sally too; you are too experienced on these boards and seemingly too intelligent than to think that a post like that wasn't going to start getting responses like Mozz's.

That was from 3 days ago, well past your mark of "12 hours". Oops, there goes your point! Try again, champ.

Christian "Minimum Wage" Cage;3672307 said:
What does Mozz's and José's catfight have to do with the election? Trod along, fellas. Settle your differences elsewhere.

Well, seeing as how I'm not surprised that you lack basic reading comprehension skills, it has to do with the fact that the harassment and doomsaying that people like Mozz and you are perpetuating against Dagger supporters is what is driving his numbers up. You calling out each new person in the thread and tracking to see if they are voting Dagger or not? That kind of shit isn't helping.
 
DirtyJosé;3672310 said:
Well, seeing as how I'm not surprised that you lack basic reading comprehension skills, it has to do with the fact that the harassment and doomsaying that people like Mozz and you are perpetuating against Dagger supporters is what is driving his numbers up. You calling out each new person in the thread and tracking to see if they are voting Dagger or not? That kind of shit isn't helping.

Nor is what you're doing it right now, José. It wouldn't surprise me if a few posters decided to vote against any Coco or Crock because of your relentless need to post pieces of shit in people's rep.
 
Few points I don't think some people are understanding:
  • 1. The entire argument for voting Coco the Monkey is that he would provide a lot of 'lulz'. If you're someone like me, who finds Coco's posts to be the equivalent of mind chafing, then it's not appealing. The reputation of troll aficionado is not impressive.
  • 2. Most of this election has been about shitting all over Dagger. Therefore the logical best way to provide the 'lulz' would be to vote Dagger, and have all of the people who wanted Coco to win so they could be entertained, freak out instead and thus provide entertainment to the rest of us. It's like counter-trolling the trolls.
 
Few points I don't think some people are understanding:
  • 1. The entire argument for voting Coco the Monkey is that he would provide a lot of 'lulz'. If you're someone like me, who finds Coco's posts to be the equivalent of mind chafing, then it's not appealing. The reputation of troll aficionado is not impressive.

Aren't you the person that though NorCal was racist because he doesn't want to have sex with black people?
 
Aren't you the person that though NorCal was racist because he doesn't want to have sex with black people?

Are you referring to the thread where NorCal admitted he was at least a bigot? No, my arguments are quite clearly laid out in that thread, and none of them were, 'You won't sleep with black women, therefore racist".

You should read it again and then come back.
 
Are you referring to the thread where NorCal admitted he was at least a bigot? No, my arguments are quite clearly laid out in that thread, and none of them were, 'You won't sleep with black women, therefore racist".

You should read it again and then come back.

I don't have to if you think NorCal would legitimately admit to being a bigot.
 
You don't have to educate yourself on what I actually said for a lot of reasons, but here's a good reason why you should: So you don't look like an idiot for presenting a straw man argument of what I said.

Trust me, I don't. In fact, you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who paid attention that argument that thinks that you aren't an idiot.
 
DirtyJosé;3672310 said:
That was from 3 days ago, well past your mark of "12 hours". Oops, there goes your point! Try again, champ.

Even if I give you the three days it doesn't change the point at all. It was still after the final vote actually started. Also, that three days seems like it might be a little generous:

Christian "Minimum Wage" Cage;3672335 said:
Nor is what you're doing it right now, José. It wouldn't surprise me if a few posters decided to vote against any Coco or Crock because of your relentless need to post pieces of shit in people's rep.


As long as Dagger didn't win, I was fine. The fact that he PM'd random people who had no idea what was going on just gets on my last nerve.

So you are infuriated that he campaigned in the election? You do realize that a mod deals with everyone on the forum, not just the people they deem worthy, right?
 
Trust me, I don't. In fact, you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who paid attention that argument that thinks that you aren't an idiot.

Thankfully, I am not responsible for people incorrectly interpreting what was being said. Like I said in the thread, I'm confident that any intelligent person who reads its entirety will know what's what (I'm making an inference about your intelligence).
 
Thankfully, I am not responsible for people incorrectly interpreting what was being said. Like I said in the thread, I'm confident that any intelligent person who reads its entirety will know what's what (I'm making an inference about your intelligence).

You know how if you can hear voices in your head and nobody else can it doesn't mean other people are deaf, it means your crazy? Well if you think you're intelligent and nobody else does, it doesn't make everyone ignorant, it means you're stupid.
 
You know how if you can hear voices in your head and nobody else can it doesn't mean other people are deaf, it means your crazy? Well if you think you're intelligent and nobody else does, it doesn't make everyone ignorant, it means you're stupid.

I'm not going to educate you in psychological theory or in logical fallacies. Your assumptions are incorrect and your reasoning is flawed. If you want to provide anything of substance for your argument, like some proof of where I said NorCal didn't want to date black women and that made him racist, I'd gladly address it. I think you'll probably stick to your strong suit though, which is making incorrect statements and using faulty logic.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top