Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The only reasonable answer is John Cena.
Sure you had Rock and Austin. But they were only around for the first few years and a majority of that time was spent in limited usage. You could say Triple H because let's be honest, he dominated the World/WWE Title scene the whole decade, created one of the most successful stables in Evolution, and brought DX back. But going back to around 2006/2007 he hasn't been used has much due to injury and age and still don't think he made as big an impact to the business as Cena did this decade.
From 04-Present John Cena has been the biggest name in the company. He is the WWE's money maker and has been since at least 2005. He's had solid feud after solid feud with Edge, Orton, Angle, HBK, Jericho, Batista, Lesnar, JBL, HHH, every big name you could think of he's faced, had great matches with, and usually came out of the feud the better man. He's held the WWE Title 7 times and World Heavyweight Twice, not to mention the Tag Titles and making the U.S. Title relevant at it's beginning. Everything WWE is today and has been for the last 5 years has John Cena's influence written all over it. From the Spinner Belt to the flashier set to the basic tone of the company screams John Cena. He is the perfect role model for kids, the Hogan of this decade he preaches the same values just in a way that kids these days can relate to, Hustle Loyalty Respect. No doubt he is the biggest Superstar in all of wrestling, has been for 4 or 5 years and will be for years to come.
Show me someone who has had a bigger decade than Cena, you can't. There is no other choice than Cena for Superstar of the Decade.
Why is this thread being brought up again? I've already covered this at the end of '09...
Once again, if there's someone who deserves to be Wrestler of the Decade more than Cena, it's Kurt Angle. Don't bring up the stupid "Ohh he's a role model for kids crap"; that doesn't make you a wrestler of the decade.
Cena is where he is today because of guys like Kurt Angle and don't you forget it. Angle accomplished alot greater achievements than Cena, grew to become the best mainstream technical wrestler around, and had WAY better matches than Cena ALL DECADE LONG. Cena can't tie Angle's boots for this choice...forget it
So just because he wrestled his first match against Angle, you're saying he's here because of guys like him?
The only thing Angle has achieved in the WWE that Cena hasn't is winning King of the Ring. Most of the moves Kurt Angle does aren't even technical so I'm not classifying him as a technical wrestler. Kurt Angle was never the top guy in WWE and had to go to TNA to achieve that. Cena has been the top guy for five years. Cena has been a draw the likes of which Angle can only dream of. I'll put Angle maybe fourth behind Cena, HHH, and Undertaker.
Sure Cena is a draw but not the biggest of the decade. Ratings and PPV buyrates have gone downhill since Cena took over after guys like Austin, Brock Lesnar, The Rock, and Goldberg left. Cena is where he is today because Kurt Angle put him over back in '05, you can't tell me that.
And that Angle had to be a top guy only in TNA? WHAT?! He was always a top guy in the WWE. Why is it that he's a main eventer in TNA? Explain that.
hey no one in their right mind thinks cena is a better wrestler than angle but this is for superstar of the decade. while angle has done alot cena carries the company on his shoulder and the only reason ppv buys are down is because wrestling isn't as popular and the tough economy. but cena keepsa the company afloat with his merch sales alone, and then he draws for raw and the ppvs.
if angle had stayed with the E you would probably have a better argument and you might just be right. but cena bleeds wwe so you probably wont be able to convince anyone otherwise lol
Sure Cena is a draw but not the biggest of the decade. Ratings and PPV buyrates have gone downhill since Cena took over after guys like Austin, Brock Lesnar, The Rock, and Goldberg left. Cena is where he is today because Kurt Angle put him over back in '05, you can't tell me that.
And that Angle had to be a top guy only in TNA? WHAT?! He was always a top guy in the WWE. Why is it that he's a main eventer in TNA? Explain that.
Your inability to understand how ratings work and appreciate that we're in a boom right now is laughable. A 3.2 on cable today isn't the same as a 3.2 on cable ten years ago. The sooner people get it through their heads that Cena and the "PG era" are bringing in plenty of viewers, the better.Merchandise sales is nothing compared to what The Rock or Stone Cold ever did. It was MORE than just selling T-Shirts. And another reason why WWE has gone downhill since Cena took over is because they pushed him to the moon and got rid of many or most die-hard WWE fans with how they changed the product and the people they've pushed.
Cena helped raise the company after HHH had his title reigns from 2003-2005 or did you not watch wrestling back then. Kurt Angle hurt Cena more than he helped him. JBL put him over at Wrestlemania 21. His year long title reign helped him get over with the fans. Prove to me that Angle was a draw.
When was Angle a top guy in the WWE? It wasn't during his first title reign that's for sure while you had Rock, Austin, Undertaker, and HHH. TNA needed a big name and Kurt Angle was a big name. That doesn't mean he's the superstar of the decade. If Cena went to TNA in 2006, he would have gotten the same reaction and be a main eventer today.
Kurt Angle was never a "Big ratings draw". He was more of a wrestler who became very successful for his work. Cena is the bigger mainstream draw here, of course, but what I don't get is how is it that being the face of a company that has gone downhill since Austin, Brock Lesnar, The Rock, and Goldberg left make you a great superstar of the decade? Cena's been busting his ass, sure, but he can't carry Rock or Austin's jock as far as being on the same level as them. He's also contributed in getting rid of many hardcore WWE fans.
I picked Angle because he's been there with the best and has beaten the best all decade long and had better matches. He was also a top guy in the WWE in 2002-2006. Cena is a respectable choice but what if Brock Lesnar or The Rock never left?
It's real cute how you put Lesnar and Goldberg with Austin and The Rock liked they really helped any while they were here. Cena's been there with the best of his era and beaten them clean which half the time I could say the same thing for Angle. I think you're being a little generous to say when Angle was a top guy in the WWE.
Merchandise sales is nothing compared to what The Rock or Stone Cold ever did. It was MORE than just selling T-Shirts. Ratings and buyrates have gone at an all-time low with Cena as well so go ahead and accept mediocrity. And another reason why WWE has gone downhill since Cena took over is because they pushed him to the moon and got rid of many or most die-hard WWE fans with how they changed the product and the people they've pushed.
Angle is a strong possibility for Wrestler of the Decade, but only a small possibility as Superstar of the Decade
This is plain ignorant. To discredit Cena because someone put him over is plain stupid. Every wrestler has come in and been put over by someone. So by that account, we'll have to say the wrestler of the decade was some guy who actually wrestled back in the 1940s, because he put over a guy who put over a guy....etc etc.
Buy Rates are lower because of more competition, not because of John Cena. There's other mediums competing for the consumers PPV dollers, not to mention internet piracy.
And yeah, TV ratings are NOT the most reliable ways to compare popularity over the decades. There are more televisions in households than say.. the 80s, so a fewer % will watch a certian show.
Most of the attitude era fans who came and went were just there for the eye candy and gore and childish skits.
But anyways, don't discredit Cena just because you have something against the way he was pushed.
Lesnar and Goldberg had starpower I know that. Angle was a top guy in the WWE in 2002-2006 wrestling-wise. That was my whole point. Wrestling-wise, Kurt Angle is the Wrestler of the Decade. He had better matches and better opponents than Cena.
Mainstream-wise, Cena is a respectable choice for Superstar or Wrestler of the Decade. He's a draw for the kids but I have no other choice to say that because of how the WWE has gone downhill, which is sad, and he's the only one who's done good. It just depends of how you see it. Wrestling-wise or Mainstream-wise. But I pick Angle. He's established himself as a legend this whole decade.