I know that, but in the end The Undertaker is just going to win and I don't see Triple H agreeing to put The Undertaker over AGAIN at a WrestleMania because arn't there stories about how Triple H doesn't like The Undertaker or something along those lines, something about tension?
Also because I reckon Triple H will face Shawn at WrestleMania 25 because they are the best of friends and could put on an amazing match.
Yes they could put on a great match. That's a fact because we've seen it 4 or 5 times. We've seen HHH v Taker 3 times i think, and when HHH won the second match it was due to Brock Lesnar running in.
HHH has never beaten Taker cleanly, so a) imo HHH can say he's the best as much as he wants to, but until he cleanly beats the Undertaker, i'm not going to acknowledge that idea as a possibility, and b) any match they had would have an added level of suspense and intrigue because people would wonder if HHH could actually beat him cleanly. They've maintained the whole 'Batista has never beaten Edge with the World title on the line' (even though he did in his first WHC run on Raw), so why wouldn't they keep 'HHH can't beat Taker?'
Yes apparently there is tension between Taker and HHH, according to Wrestlezone, and they didn't elaborate any further than that so i'll believe it when i see footage of Taker and HHH about to come to blows backstage or when one does an in-ring shoot on the other. If it is true, then it should still be irrelevant because Vince and the Creative team decide who wins and who loses, no the talent. You can say that HHH politics his way to the top all you want, but there is no way he'd have enough stroke to convince others to let him beat someone like Taker if that was not the original plan.
mark Callaway is the backbone of that company. you can say HBK all you want, but i don't recall the Undertaker ever taking 4 years off. He's had his fair share of time on the injury list as well, but he draws, puts guys over, allows his character to get screwed over more often than ANYONE else i've ever seen in WWE, and still takes the sick ass bumps when neccessary.
i honestly don't think HHH could walk visit Vince at home and say:
"Hey Vince, i heard what you're planning for the PPV next month with me and Taker.... and i was wondering..... could you change it so that i beat him instead. I really don't think me jobbing will help anyone, whereas if I beat him, no one can say i'm not a legend right? Whaddya say?"
Without Vince saying:
"Fuck sake Paul, you've been the champ 12 times! And now you want me to change everything just so you don't have to lose to Mark? He's always been loyal to us, and i've told him you're jobbing, so the answer is no, and that's final!"
That's a deeper insight to my opinion