If you've taken the time to register an account and post on a Wrestling Forums then you are generally considered to be a part of the Internet Wrestling Community. The people you are referring to (the one's in the comments section on WZ Main site) they are what people would technically refer to as idiots. They tend to appear in most places on the Internet.
No, it's 2014, and it's safe to assume that every single fan of the WWE has some access in the USA to internet. Having internet and being a wrestling fan and looking up wrestling stuff on said internet does not make a person a member of the IWC.
The IWC is a strange creation because if you're IN the IWC, you believe everyone that posts on the internet about wrestling is a member of the IWC, and therefore, any ridicule for the IWC is for everyone.
The truth is that the IWC is a very small subset of fans of wrestling that post on the internet about wrestling. The name might have started as Internet Wrestling Community, but much like other groups in other facets of life, it has taken a life of its own.
Generally speaking, really, the IWC prefers several things, regardless of who it is that is ranting in a random thread.
1 - They hate John Cena. Maybe a little, maybe a lot. But they think he's just not that good.
2 - They often discuss some random Indy event, some Japanese wrestler, or someone else unknown to a mainstream wrestling fan, and how great that wrestler would be in the WWE.
3 - They value "wrestling skill" to character/promo/out of ring ability, even when the particular wrestler doesn't really have that good of in-ring skills (See CM Punk).
4 - If it's cool, if it's popular, if mainstream fans of the WWE like it, then it must be bad.
5 - Fantasy booking. And I mean REAL fantasy booking. Stuff like Kane deciding to no longer work for The Authority, and giving Undertaker, his brother, his anti-death powers for his match against Lesnar. Stuff like that.
6 - Referencing the Attitude Era or the Ruthless Aggression Era as the best times of wrestling ever. Pure disdain for the current era.
7 - Very very very selective memories about selective wrestlers. Hogan. Hall and Nash. Jericho. HBK. And so on.
8 - Using a character's real life name in discussion, as though they are particularly smart about the secret identity of CM Punk being Phil Brooks, or Undertaker being Mark Calaway. It's a way to show everyone else that they take their wrestling more seriously, but it's impossible to work them.
9 - In reference to the above, they are often the most worked person in the entire discussion.
10 - Get massively offended by the term "smark," even though they frequently don't understand the meaning behind the term.
There's more, but please stop calling everyone that has internet and visits wrestling websites a member of the IWC.
That being said, I think we were all worked by this recent CM Punk stuff, but I really liked the way the WWE handled it last night.