You do realize you just supported John Cena winning right?
Was I? Or was I simply pointing out the fact that the WWE is not adverse to making these kinds of decisions? While I'm sure The Rock has no problem doing the job for Cena at Mania, it is a very real possibility that he could walk away with the victory.
Is giving The Rock this title worth burying the top star? Before you hit quote and say it wouldn't be burying Cena, let me say this. It would. If the Rock beats Cena, Cena looks weak. And, this whole match has so much anticipation and build to it that the loser risks taking the loss and looking like the worse of the two men. So why not let Cena, since he will be here for the long haul, be the better man.
How? Cena is the "Mortal Champion". He loses. He's not Superman. How does Cena look weak if he loses? Neither one will look "worse" for the loss. It's The Rock and John Cena. You keep saying that The Rock has nothing to gain from winning this match. I disagree. He gains plenty, but you seem to keep overlooking these things. You seem to forget the biggest part of The Rock's persona; his ego.
The fans that dislike Cena now are the older male demographic and IWC members like us. All of Cena's haters are smart enough to respect Cena if he beats The Rock. They could loathe him, but that makes them look stupid. You would hate a guy because he beat one of the greatest? That doesn't make much sense. That seems a little irrational. If Cena can defeat the Great One, then Cena can gain the respect of the fans who hate him now.
Are you kidding me? John Cena could rescue a group of orphans from a burning building on live TV and he would get booed. You mean to tell me that booing Cena
now doesn't make people look stupid in some sense? He's a face, has been for a very long time, yet he gets booed out of the building every week. This situation is lose-lose for John Cena, while The Rock can still prove something.
Shall I call you Vince Russo?
Cena is going to make an excuse for losing to The Rock? That would be 100% out of character.
That build for the rematch is the same build we got for HBK/Taker 2, and similar to the one we are getting from HHH/Taker 3. It has be used to many times already.
Ehh, i am done with you.
Calling me Vince Russo would require some sort of intelligent justification to back it, but I shall not hold my breathe on this one.
Maybe an excuse wasn't the right word... My point is that if Cena loses, he'll come out on Monday and praise The Rock for being the "Better man" at Mania. He's good at taking a loss. We have seen it over...and over...and over...
Did you just say that something the WWE does has been used over and over again? Has thet
ever stopped them from doing anything?!
Also, the bold statement, a prime example of a run-on sentence, may be correct.
This is a debate, not an English class.
If one man got the pin, there would be no reason for a rematch. And we do not need a rematch! You are supporting everything I have stated with this statement. A win for Cena would close the reason of a rematch, and that is what we need to see. The option of a rematch would ruin the whole first match. These two can only take so many grade school jabs at each other. This match has been building and building and building forever; a rematch means you must continue the build. And I don’t know about you or any of the judges, but I do not want to see an extended build between the two just so we can see more personal jabs at Cena’s look, or more worldwide trends, or hear on and on about Rock writing on his wrist. I am already tired of the child-like arguments between The Rock and Cena. No rematch, period.
(You forgot to mention Cenas 'lady parts'.)
Allow me to disprove the bold sentence, if I may:
1. Mr Perfect vs Bret Hart
Semi Finals King of the Ring. 1993
Rematch from SummerSlam 1991
2. Ricky Steamboat vs Ric Flair
Clash of Champions-2/3 falls match.
Rematch from Chi Town Rumble 1989.
3. Bret Hart vs Steve Austin
Wrestlemania 13.
Rematch from Survivor Series 1996
4. John Cena vs Shawn Michaels
Raw in London.
Rematch From Wrestlemania 23.
All of these matches were rematches that far surpassed the awesomeness of the original match. Steamboat vs Flair topped what was already considered the greatest match of all time, from the Chi-Town Rumble.
HELL YEAH HE DOES!
Like I said before, Cena is fading away from his top spot! He needs a new reason to stay at the top! A win over The Rock would provide for a possible character change for Cena. Then, Cena can salvage his fading position. Cena needs this win. It will help him in the long run when he is here and the Rock is not.
A loss for Cena would
also provide a possible character change for him. Much more than a win would, I guarantee that. Cena's position "on top" is not fading. Stepping aside for younger, fresher talent to make a name is hardly giving it up or quitting. Once all this Rock vs Cena; Punk vs Jericho nonsense is over with, you'll see Cena back in the title picture. Until then, The Rock beating John Cena at Wrestlemania will be a pill we have to swallow for quite some time.
NO REMATCH! IT WILL NOT HAVE AS BIG OF A FEEL TO IT! The topics from this build have been done to death; we do not need the possibility of another whole year build for a WM29 rematch. And as for a possible Summer Slam match, that will feel nowhere near as big as the first! It is like most movie sequels, they are nowhere near as good the second time around.
Refer to my post above about rematches having the potential to be bigger and better than the original matches.
You keep talking about this rematch. No, no, no, no, no! Cena vs. The Rock in the main event at WrestleMania 28 is the payoff match.

Again, refer to my list.
OVERALL-
This is WrestleMania, why would the main event end in a senseless no contest? People are paying to see a winner now! This is not Hell In A Cell; this is not Elimination Chamber, or even Over The Limit. This is not a transitional Pay Per View! This match does not, no cannot, be squandered to set up for another! I do not care how many times you say people will pay for a rematch! This is WrestleMania! This is THE match! The WWE has spent so much on this one match! And you are telling me it needs to end in a no contest just so there can be a rematch? Let me answer that for you, wrong! This worldwide phenomenon cannot be used to set up for a rematch at a much, MUCH smaller Pay Per View. This is WrestleMania! This is the match to see! This is the match we the people have been waiting for! This is the top babyface in the WWE John Cena vs. the fan favorite wrestler turned Hollywood star Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson! This is the biggest match of this era of sports entertainment! THIS IS WRESTLEMANIA 28, THE EVENT WHERE JOHN CENA GOES OVER DWAYNE JOHNSON AND WINS THE MATCH EVERYONE WANTS TO SEE!!! A no contest is flat out stupid!
You have done nothing to prove the point that a no contest is stupid. Nothing. You have not said a single word that has made any sense, in regards to this being a stupid ending. It makes more sense than Cena winning the match, that is for sure.
My overall point is not as complicated as you gentlemen seem to want to make it.
The Rock comes back, proves
why he is "The Most Electrifying Man in ALL of Entertainment", to prove that he is "The best of all time", and to put the exclamation point on the answer to one of Cena's comments that started this all to begin with:
Cena: "Our fan base have so much admiration for him, he's got to respect that. He doesn't give anything back."
Except that hand-delivering an ass-whooping to Cena at Wrestlemania would be like giving all of those booing fans (more than likely all members of "Team Bring It") an early Christmas present. More than enough to ride off into the sunset with...