Guys in tiny indy promotions have to get noticed, and have to do stupid things. They do like a show a week, and then recover whilst doing their day job in McDonald's or whatever. WWE superstars have 300 shows a year. The typical feud lasts a month, or 25 shows. This means that if one superstars finisher was the piledriver, they'd receive potentially 25 career ending moves a month. This is untenable.
It isn't the wrestlers that foot the bill when it goes wrong, its the company, and if they want to ban unecessarily risky moves, then they should. It is detrimental in the company in pretty much every single way to allow career threatening moves to be used on a regular basis, and I support the ban.
As for the Undertaker, the tombstone is different from the standard piledriver as the head has both the shin and the thigh stopping it from reaching the ground: even if he drops them, they'll only hurt their shoulders. That is why he is allowed to do it.
It isn't the wrestlers that foot the bill when it goes wrong, its the company, and if they want to ban unecessarily risky moves, then they should. It is detrimental in the company in pretty much every single way to allow career threatening moves to be used on a regular basis, and I support the ban.
As for the Undertaker, the tombstone is different from the standard piledriver as the head has both the shin and the thigh stopping it from reaching the ground: even if he drops them, they'll only hurt their shoulders. That is why he is allowed to do it.