Pick Your Poison: The Finger Poke of Doom or David Arquette as World Champion

I disagree entirely. If you truly believe "Wrestling is about suspension of beleif (sic)" than the FOD and Arquette are equally plausible because we are suspending our disbelief. They were BOTH crappy booking in my view. The FOD seemed like a move pulled by disgruntled men acting like children because creative wouldn't let them have their way. There is still debate on whether it was a work, or booking, or some crazy amalgamation of the two. Arquette sucked because it took a belt that used to mean something and denigrated it into a glorified movie poster, simply to sell tickets to said movie. I like "Ready to Rumble" by the way, because I can suspend my disbelief and laugh like hell at it. But, giving DA the strap IN REAL LIFE? It wasn't entertaining wrestling, it didn't make any sense from a story line point of view, nobody that was employed by WCW got over, and I just didn't get it.

And Vegas, if you hit me with another BS "spamming" demerit, or whatever the hell they are, at least have the guts to leave a correspondence address so we can discuss the reasoning behind it. Don't be a telephone tough guy. If I can get my point across succinctly what is the problem? You like reading 3 paragraphs of poor spelling and grammar and then trying to decipher the meandering point of all of it? Don't be a jerk. And take note that I din't call you a jerk, I told you to not be one.
 
Ok, first, have a flaming infraction for talking like that to Mr.Vegas, and for spamming up my forum :)

Second, you are contradicting yourself. Wrestling IS suspension of beleif, always has been always will be. Not usre what else you call guys with characters having fake fights. So therefore, in the world of kayfabe, there is no such thing as "creative" and "two guys doing something becuase they didnt get their way". It was quite the heel swerve actually. When all the Arquette thing was trying to use the title to promote a movie. One heel alowing another to go over him is entirely plausable in the world of kayfabe, while the arquette thing was just so blatantly obvious a rather long, involved commercial for a shit bucket movie.
 
I'll take Arquette as world champion to be worse, when everyone started saying how angry they were about the "fingerpoke of doom" Kevin Nash's response was "your supposed to be you jackass"

I think that sums it up perfectly, it provoked a reaction and in theory should have made people tune in. . . . . . . something went wrong on that point though
 
All right, 6 days later, I can respond. Sorry for letting my frustration with Vegas intrude on your thread, NorCal.

If you go back and read, all I said was that they are both plausible if you are suspending disbelief. The points that followed that statement had nothing to do with suspending disbelief, they were just my reasons for my opinion. I didn't see the FOD as a heel swerve at all, especially given that it was most likely done without the approval of the bookers. I saw it more as something that 2 guys worked out backstage that screwed over the fans, other wrestlers, and ultimately the company. But it's not like the the company needed any help screwing themselves after the DA nonsense. It was like slow suicide.
 
I wouldn't say the fingerpoke was bad in retrospect, I thought it was bad then and there! I live in Canada, and obviously didn't get "Nitro" live, as a matter of fact, we didn't get it up here until Wednesday afternoon usually. (We did get "Thunder" however....joy!). Off topic: However I'll tell you, I would've chosen Mankind vs. The Rock over Hogan vs. Nash.

But back to the subject at hand, I think we can debate forever where WCW "Jumped the Shark" so to speak. I cite the Sting/Hogan match as the begining of a VERY slow slide, yeah the immediate impact wasn't felt, because the compnay drew tons of money in 1998, but it made one of there top legends, into a joke, and I don't think Sting ever recovered from it.

But you see, "Nitro" & "Raw", head to head that night in the ratings, were neck and neck, from what has been said by others, until that little comment by Mr. Skee-Vone, and what the reamaining fans on "Nitro" saw, just flabbergasted them, and I actually can't recall if "Nitro" ever came that close to beating "Raw" again!!! So the immediate impact of that angle, was felt. The fact that Bischoff was trying to recreate what made his company great in 1996, by uniting the nWo, was rediculous.

I personally think Arquette was the final nail in the coffin. And the fact that Dave didn't want it, made it all the more sad. And the fact that Russo, still defends it to this day, because it got mainstream press (not drawing a dime in the process), is also outlandishly rediculous.

And yes...I've heard Bischoff constantly use the Time-Warner excuse, of them not wanting wrestling on there TV, that's why it died. I would have to think if WCW was drawing the kind of money they were from 1996-1998, and people from TW, were MAKING money off of it, then they probably wouldnt've given them the axe. Just my theory.
 
I honestly think the fingerpoke of doom was the bigger poison. "Here, I'll lay down and you can pin me so we can get this over with. Fuck the fans, they'll turn on Nitro to see if we explain ourselves, we'll just ask them what they would do if the bar down the street had free beers and we wanted to get back before it was over". No, I'm not saying that happened, but it wouldn't surprise me if it did.

Really, Arquette winning the title, is plausible. He didn't go over a "Wrassler" for the belt, he pinned Eric Bischoff after everyone else had been knocked out. He "took advantage" of an opportunity sat in front of him. Seriously, think of the situation there before you make it the killer of all things WCW
 
Honestly the fingerpoke didn't bother me to much I thought it was funny I did switch over to Raw; buy the thime Arquette won the title had totally stop watching to WCW I would switch over every couple of months to see what was happening but it was worthless shit I stop watching wrestling as a whole in 01 for 5 years.
 
The Fingerpoke was definalely what killed WCW. By the time Arquette got the belt, the damage was done. Actually, if I remember correctly, the tide changed for WCW earlier that night, before the Fingerpoke...

Nitro opens up.
Nash comes out with his belt and demands that Goldberg get another shot at the title.
The main event is set. Nash vs. Goldberg rematch. Nitro has a shot at winning the ratings for the first time in a while. The first uncontested hour draws a good rating. Raw opens up, they are taped this week and Nitro is live. This would become very important later in the show. Nitro starts to go to shit. Goldberg still hasnt showed up, and Elizabeth comes out with the stalking angle. Raw pulls ahead of Nitro in the ratings, but WCW still should pull it out with the big Goldberg-Nash rematch right?

FOOLISH MORTAL!!!!!

About 30 minutes before the main event, Goldberg has been arrested and is in an Atlanta police station. The charges have been dropped and he is on his way. Tony Schiavonne hypes the main event and then says the one line that will change the course of wrestling history forever..."Mick Foley is going to win the World Title Tonight! That'll put asses is seats!"

America changed channels from Nitro to Raw and never changed back.

Of course, WCW went on to screw up the main event with the finger poke, but the real damage was done by Tony and Eric.
 
The Death of WCW- its a subject filled with more heinsite than probably anything in the history of wrestling So many things such as answering yes to a question instead of no, yes, something that simple could have made the company still be alive today.

we all know the birth of Nitro was the beginning of the Monday Night War, but the true beginning was when Scott Hall came out and declared war on WCW on May 27, 1996.

people try to pinpoint the death of WCW and what meant more as far as killing the company on one thing, there are several things and heres the list

1st nail in the coffin-The NWO getting watered down with people like Big Bubba and other superstars

2nd nail in the coffin-Eric Bischoff joining the NWO

3rd Nail in the coffin-Starrcade 1997

4th nail in the coffin-The NWO getting so watered down it was not the WCW vs. NWO anymore, but it was NWO's Nitro

5th nail in the coffin-NWO splitting into different factions

6th Nail in the coffin-Nitro going from 2 to 3 hours

7th nail in the coffin-the birth of Thunder

8th nail in the coffin-not doing shit with Bret Hart, they paid almost as much, if not as much to get his services as they did Hogan, and he was the hottest free agent in wrestling, but they didnt do shit with him

9th nail in the coffin-Goldberg's streak ending at Starrcade 1998

10th nail in the coffin-the fingerpoke of doom

11th nail in the coffin-humiliating Flair and putting him in horrendous storylines

Final Nail in the coffin-losing Dean Malenko, Benoit, Guerrero and Perry Saturn

Last bit of dirt being shoveled on the casket-David Arquette winning the World Title

and the preacher giving the final words-the AOL/time warner merger and Jamie Kellner taking wrestling off of TNT

:flair:
 
The Death of WCW- its a subject filled with more heinsite than probably anything in the history of wrestling So many things such as answering yes to a question instead of no, yes, something that simple could have made the company still be alive today.

While WCW did indeed die, it's debateable as to whther or not it could still be around today. I mean it was still pulling in 3's and 3.5's, which are very damned respectable numbers, even in today's market. Any network could have benefited by Nitro being on the air. Turner could have bankrolled it himself and pulled down a little money. Time Warner's board decided that WCW needed to die because they wanted to go in a different direction with their programming, just as the CW is doing with Smackdown. Regardless of ratings. Once that was decided, WCW had no choice but to die.

we all know the birth of Nitro was the beginning of the Monday Night War, but the true beginning was when Scott Hall came out and declared war on WCW on May 27, 1996.

Actually the Monday Night Wars began the moment that Eric Bischoff decided to do whatever it took in order to get people to watch. It wasn't when Nitro began. it wasn't when Scott Hall walked out. When Bischoff started doing things such as giving away RAW results on Nitro, then it was war. Until that point, it was just friendly competition between two companies that offer similar products. Much like Coke and Pepsi. But if Pepsi started giving out the formula to Coke with every 12 pack you buy, then it is a war. See the difference?

people try to pinpoint the death of WCW and what meant more as far as killing the company on one thing, there are several things and heres the list

Several things led to a ratings decline, not a death. But it's a process of you being stagnant and your competition being proactive. I mean I could see if the ratings dropped and didn't increase on the other side. But they went up for RAW, which meant that WWE was now offering something different as an alternative. Much how Nitro did when they were in control.

1st nail in the coffin-The NWO getting watered down with people like Big Bubba and other superstars

No, adding people like Bubba Rodgers and Scott Norton to the fold was called "strength in number". Besides, the NWO has to look fierce but still has to look as if they have have weak points. The major players can't be those weak points. Therefore, you have men like Bubba Rodgers in the fold. Plus, you need pawns to do the dirty work. It's chess, plain and simple.

2nd nail in the coffin-Eric Bischoff joining the NWO

No, it has to look like the NWO has an insider who wields the power to legitimize their power and to create the weak link for their fall later. It's more believable for Bischoff to be the die hard Hogan manager than for him to be the fan and supporter who got his heart broken. It helped create one of wrestling's greatest heels and most memorable personas.

3rd Nail in the coffin-Starrcade 1997

I really don't see how this was a nail. They did what WWE does alot now. They had one ending and then they did something to please the crowd. The difference is that they did it on ppv rather than a dark match. Pretty much, the crowd was starting to think that WCW would never beat the NWO. This showed that was not true and gave momentum to WCW again.

4th nail in the coffin-The NWO getting so watered down it was not the WCW vs. NWO anymore, but it was NWO's Nitro

It all depends on what your definition of "watered down" is. Do you mean that the stable got watered down with pawns or do you mean that the angle got watered down? Because pretty much, on the other side, RAW was being watered down with Stone Cold throughout the whole program. I mean I don't know about you, but I would rather see a variety of people in a stable than a whole program being dedicated to Stone Cold walking around outside someone's house trying to get in for two hours.

5th nail in the coffin-NWO splitting into different factions

Well, once again, this is chess. Sometimes, in chess you need to make your opponent believe that there is not cohesiveness in order to lure them into a false sense of security. And having two different NWO's was pretty much the NWO saying that there was an "elite" ad a squad of "pawns". I could see if you brought up the LWO. That was just overkill.

6th Nail in the coffin-Nitro going from 2 to 3 hours

Actually, it's the same logic as to why a program goes from 1 hour to 2 hours. You figure that ratings are strong and you could not only feature your ratings grabber but also build up other stories with the extra time. It's not bad logic to be honest.

7th nail in the coffin-the birth of Thunder

Well no. Having a B show where you could showcase other talent was actually a pre-cursor to what WWE is doing now with it's 'brand extensions". I actually enjoyed Thunder because I got to see alot of great cruiserweight matches. If it were still around, in that format, "smarks" would love it to death.

8th nail in the coffin-not doing shit with Bret Hart, they paid almost as much, if not as much to get his services as they did Hogan, and he was the hottest free agent in wrestling, but they didnt do shit with him

Not too long after Bret came to WCW, his brother died. If you are saying that a company should make a grieving employee work no matter what, then you are rather heartless. Sure, they were going to bring him along slowly rather than just making him a super-force, but tragedy ruined it all. And the aftermath was not going to be good either.

9th nail in the coffin-Goldberg's streak ending at Starrcade 1998

So Goldberg should have kept going? It was about time it ended. I mean people say that Goldberg was a shit wrestler with no personality anyways. So now people are mad that his streak ended? Make up your minds.

10th nail in the coffin-the fingerpoke of doom

This one I don't get. So let me help you guys with this one. Wrestling is FAKE. The point of pro wrestling is for one guy to lay down for the othr. Now there are many ways that this can happen, but one still lays down for the other. The "Finger Poke Of Doom" was no different. The problem with it is that you people were salivating over seeing Hogan get his ass kicked by Nash and pretty much you got swerved. I could see if you paid good money and it happened on a ppv, which the Jarrett laying down for Hogan thing did and gets no flack for, but it was on free tv. Suck it up. It was funny. Plain and simple.

11th nail in the coffin-humiliating Flair and putting him in horrendous storylines

Horrendous storyline like what? Dancing around backstage saying that he's going to take some Viagra and go "all night long"? No wait, that happened on RAW. Flair just wasn't going to be world champ. But he did still get prestige. Not sure what you mean by the storylines. You will have to elaborate before I can truly break down to you how pointless this statement was.

Final Nail in the coffin-losing Dean Malenko, Benoit, Guerrero and Perry Saturn

While losing them was "something", it wasn't a nail. But WCW did shoot themselves in the foot by not building up more young stars until later on. But WWE really didn't do anything significant with any of these guys until after WCW folded. So it wasn't that really big a loss at the time.

Last bit of dirt being shoveled on the casket-David Arquette winning the World Title

Okay, you got me. I can't defend this much. But it wasn't a nail in the coffin. I mean Vince McMahon isn't really more convincing than Arquette as being a champion, and he's a TWO TIME champion of his own company. Explain that one to me and I'll explain Arquette.

and the preacher giving the final words-the AOL/time warner merger and Jamie Kellner taking wrestling off of TNT
:flair:

Actually, TNT, much like the CW, decided that they wanted to go in different programming direction. The ratings were still respectable for cable ratings. But the decision was made. And that is noted by the fact that you don't really even see sports on TNT, TBS, or TMC these days. Even Braves baseball and Hawks basketball has been cut back immensely since WCW was tossed. Plus, Vince could have easily found another network to put WCW on. He just decided not to.
 
well seing as you didnt agree with anything I stated. what do you personally think caused the death and ratings decline of WCW- let me respond to some of your responses to my comments


"No, adding people like Bubba Rodgers and Scott Norton to the fold was called "strength in number". Besides, the NWO has to look fierce but still has to look as if they have have weak points. The major players can't be those weak points. Therefore, you have men like Bubba Rodgers in the fold. Plus, you need pawns to do the dirty work. It's chess, plain and simple."


-ill agree with you somewhat on that, but that coincides with what I later say about being watered down-how the hell could it have possibly been NWO vs. WCW anymore when the only two stars still as part of "WCW" were a few jobbers and of course Ric Flair and Sting-in November of 96 Bischoff told everyone they had yay amount of time to turn their WCW contracts into NWO contracts-if this had happened how would we have ever seen another wrestling match or fued, seeing as every single person would have been in 1 faction


"No, it has to look like the NWO has an insider who wields the power to legitimize their power and to create the weak link for their fall later. It's more believable for Bischoff to be the die hard Hogan manager than for him to be the fan and supporter who got his heart broken. It helped create one of wrestling's greatest heels and most memorable personas."


-again ill agree with you somewhat on this, but even WCW employees said this was a big mistake in interviews, and in many shoots ive seen they say that in any organization its a curse for the booker to start writing himself in storylines



"I really don't see how this was a nail. They did what WWE does alot now. They had one ending and then they did something to please the crowd. The difference is that they did it on ppv rather than a dark match. Pretty much, the crowd was starting to think that WCW would never beat the NWO. This showed that was not true and gave momentum to WCW again."



-you say they did what WWE does a lot now, well WWE has been on a downward ratings slide themselves havent they, and it didnt please the crowd, it dumbfounded them, because Sting got pinned straight and simple with no fast count but then Bret Hart in his WCW debut came to the ring and declared it a fast count and order the match restarted and that the bell be rung when hogan hadnt even tapped, and where did Hart get his power to restart matches and declare champions anyway, is was politicer Hogan who wouldnt do the job cleanly, and had Sting won without controversy, many believe that the ratings slide that began in 98 wouldnt have happend




"It all depends on what your definition of "watered down" is. Do you mean that the stable got watered down with pawns or do you mean that the angle got watered down? Because pretty much, on the other side, RAW was being watered down with Stone Cold throughout the whole program. I mean I don't know about you, but I would rather see a variety of people in a stable than a whole program being dedicated to Stone Cold walking around outside someone's house trying to get in for two hours."


-there was a difference between Austin and some of the idiots that started to appear in the NWO, people actually liked Austin-had the original NWO that consisted of just Hall, Nash and Hogan been doing this things i'd sit and watch them run the show over and over again, but not people like Konnan and Big Bubba


"Actually, it's the same logic as to why a program goes from 1 hour to 2 hours. You figure that ratings are strong and you could not only feature your ratings grabber but also build up other stories with the extra time. It's not bad logic to be honest."


-i agree it looks good on paper, but on tv that was another story, add Thunder in there and then another hour to Nitro, they started running out of ideas, the 1st couple of 3 hour nitro specials were good, but the 1st 3 hour nitro that appeared after it was permanently switched to 3 hours was a horrible show, do you know how much "wrestling" was in this 3 hours, 11 minutes


"Not too long after Bret came to WCW, his brother died. If you are saying that a company should make a grieving employee work no matter what, then you are rather heartless. Sure, they were going to bring him along slowly rather than just making him a super-force, but tragedy ruined it all. And the aftermath was not going to be good either."


-Owen died in May of 1999, they didnt do shit with Bret since the start of his tenure there, and by that I mean all throughout 1998-in his debut at Starrcade 1997, he was a special referee in WCW vs. NWo match, yes not a wrestler, but a referee-yes he could have meant a whole new beginning for WCW, but he was just another pawn in the NWO storyline that wouldnt go away



"This one I don't get. So let me help you guys with this one. Wrestling is FAKE. The point of pro wrestling is for one guy to lay down for the othr. Now there are many ways that this can happen, but one still lays down for the other. The "Finger Poke Of Doom" was no different. The problem with it is that you people were salivating over seeing Hogan get his ass kicked by Nash and pretty much you got swerved. I could see if you paid good money and it happened on a ppv, which the Jarrett laying down for Hogan thing did and gets no flack for, but it was on free tv. Suck it up. It was funny. Plain and simple."



-its because this was the bait and switch routine that fans had seen so many times before and this one was the last straw-they wanted something new,but what ended up happening, yes something shocking that even hardcore internet fans didnt see coming- but all it was was another damn NWO birth


"Horrendous storyline like what? Dancing around backstage saying that he's going to take some Viagra and go "all night long"? No wait, that happened on RAW. Flair just wasn't going to be world champ. But he did still get prestige. Not sure what you mean by the storylines. You will have to elaborate before I can truly break down to you how pointless this statement was."


-this is the one i really wanted to contradict you on, that Raw storyline was absolutely nothing compared to the shit in WCW- by that i mean, lets see, oh yeah, Flair beeing beaten and left for dead in a Field while a camera man filmed his body laying there for the remainder of the show, or how about Flair in a mental institution and then Arn Anderson bailing him ouy, yes in WCW you can get out of a Mental Institution simply by posting bail- or how about him beeing buried alive in the desert outside of Las Vegas- or all the crap with his son David that is too numerous to even list


"So Goldberg should have kept going? It was about time it ended. I mean people say that Goldberg was a shit wrestler with no personality anyways. So now people are mad that his streak ended? Make up your minds."


-hey nobody else or myself ever said Goldberg was the best wrestler in the business, not by a longshot, but he was over like a son of a bitch and yes i think the time was right to end the streak, but not as part of...........you guessed it another NWO storyline, I think him losing the Sting or Flair would have been fantastic




These are my counter counter points to your counter points, and ill ask you again the enlighten me as to what you thought caused the Death of WCW, because if it wasnt at least one of this things, then I dont know what the hell it was

:flair:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,826
Messages
3,300,732
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top