[OFFICIAL] 2010 Debater's League Shit-Talking Thread

[Tenta]

As long as Dave knows how to set it up and all that, I don't mind him sanctioning it. Or anybody for that sake.

Well, yeah, but Dave knows us both well. He's aware of what we both know, and more importantly, what we both don't know. That we, we can have an unbiased affair

 

[Tenta]

Tenta is still ducking Dave...

But yeah, I see no problem with it at all. If you can set up a thread and a topic that you all want to debate then by all means, go ahead and set it up and start immediately. I don't think D-Man or Phoenix will be too worried about that. As you say, it gives everyone a heads-up as to how it is going to down. You might not even need a judge really.

Sweet. All we need is a topic now to get this done

 

[Ferbian]

And that's where someone else steps in. We can't choose the subject ourselves.

 

[Dave]

I'll give you a topic if you like?

 

[Tenta]

I'll give you a topic if you like?

Sweet, Hit us with it

 

[The Crock]

I think I have a decent topic, should Randy Orton have gotten a WHC reign so early in his career.

 

[Ferbian]

I can live with that. We just need a thread created or something. Probably should be somewhere in the General wrestling section. Perhaps just place it in the Debater's league and leave D to move it if he feels it suits elsewhere. And point out that nobody else should be allowed to post in it.

 

[Tenta]

I can live with that. We just need a thread created or something. Probably should be somewhere in the General wrestling section. Perhaps just place it in the Debater's league and leave D to move it if he feels it suits elsewhere. And point out that nobody else should be allowed to post in it.

So then just put it in GWS?

 

[DirtyJosé]

Go Omega Conference!

 

[Ferbian]

Yeah could work as well. Dave should make the OP really.

 

[Dave]

OK guys, here is how I see it.

The topic is as follows:

Given the respective situations of both the WWE and TNA, which company is better suited for potential growth in the next 5-10 years.

Now, I am a bit hesitant to put it in the sub-forum so since Tenta is the home debater, I would urge him to create the thread in the WWE vs TNA sub-forum and argue his case from post number one. Or, he can choose to give Ferbian the first post and Ferbian will create the thread.

I'll judge the debate if you like?

 

[Ferbian]

I love it.

Also Tenta starts, it's 2.20 AM here. Won't be on long enough to think up a reply as well as writing it.

Good luck to you Tenta.

 

[Tenta]

OK guys, here is how I see it.

The topic is as follows:

Given the respective situations of both the WWE and TNA, which company is better suited for potential growth in the next 5-10 years.

Now, I am a bit hesitant to put it in the sub-forum so since Tenta is the home debater, I would urge him to create the thread in the WWE vs TNA sub-forum and argue his case from post number one. Or, he can choose to give Ferbian the first post and Ferbian will create the thread.

I'll judge the debate if you like?

Would love you to debate, and I'll get right on. Since I am home, I'm going to be arguing first, and will argue that TNA actualluy has the room for most growth.

 

[Dave]

Right, so it is settled!

Starting from when Tenta posts the debate topic, the debate begins. Tenta will be arguing that TNA will have the most room for potential growth whilst Ferbian will debate that the WWE actually has the most room for potential growth.

I will judge the debate on Saturday. Who else wants to judge? I think I will need two more people.

 

[Ferbian]

Tenta, could you please make an easy OP about the subject and all that like the regular tournaments, just to notify everybody not to post in there except the two of us and Dave when the judging needs to be done.

I love you Dave, letting me defend WWE <3

 

[Dave]

Tenta, could you please make an easy OP about the subject and all that like the regular tournaments, just to notify everybody not to post in there except the two of us and Dave when the judging needs to be done.

I love you Dave, letting me defend WWE <3

You know, you'd be surprised how often I hear that...

 

[Ferbian]

I know, you got it sigged after all.

 

[The Crock]

Could I judge, Dave?

 

[SpoodBeest]

I'll judge if I count...

 

[Dave]

OK, Crock and SB will judge based on the criteria set out by D-Man and Phoenix for the Debater's League. As well as me of course.

 

[The Crock]

Alright cool.

 

[Ferbian]

I'm waiting Tenta. No need to create your whole argument as the OP.

 

[Phoenix]

OK guys, here is how I see it.

The topic is as follows:

Given the respective situations of both the WWE and TNA, which company is better suited for potential growth in the next 5-10 years.

Now, I am a bit hesitant to put it in the sub-forum so since Tenta is the home debater, I would urge him to create the thread in the WWE vs TNA sub-forum and argue his case from post number one. Or, he can choose to give Ferbian the first post and Ferbian will create the thread.

I'll judge the debate if you like?

Dammit Dave, I had this subject in use for the opening rounds

Just kidding!

I have no problems with you going ahead with a pre-league debate, though I would have preferred your patience. But go nuts and see how you do before the real deal kicks in

 

[Dave]

Mother Fucker!

I almost cried there.

 

[Ferbian]

Bumped your head into the wall again Dave realizing you're in over your head in week 3?