Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You cannot be this dense...Which isn't part of the criteria for regular season MVP decisions because...wait for it...the votes were decided before the performances you highlighted.
Well, if it's not based on value brought to the team and it's not based on who the best player in the game is, then what exactly can it be based on which doesn't make it a complete joke?You are generalizing what people vote the MVP based on.
They were 34-10 after James returned from his roughly two week injury rest (on Jan 13), a .773 winning percentage. They were 19-19 when he returned. They won 12 of their first 13 games after he returned and went 1-7 during the time James sat out.Even healthy there were playing badly.
They traded for Smith and Shumpert and Mozgov on Jan 7. James didn't return healthy until Jan 13.It wasn't until the Cavs fixed their lack of rim protection and added another wing defender that the Cavs became great.
And LeBron's presence transformed his team from below average to great.Yes Lebron is the best player, no one is disputing that. But Curry's improvement has transformed his team from good to elite.
And yet, his team barely snuck into the playoffs and got demolished.Anthony Davis at the Pelicans bring more value to his team than any other player.
He averaged four less minutes a game. That's it.Curry sat out more 4th quarters than Lebron where he could have padded his stats more.
And he plays point forward and small forward...in other words, he's far more versatile both offensively and defensively...which is more valuable.Lebron plays powerforward at some points in most games
So because Curry isn't as good at creating shots in close, we should just give him a pass?and is attacking closer to the basket. Deadre Jordan has a better FG% compared to Kyle Kover due to difference in positions and what they are asked to do. FG% comparisons isn't just raw numbers.
Because Curry's points are flashy. LeBron's aren't. People love the 3pt basket. They're not quite so enamored with the 15 foot jumper or the fall away post shot.More people were talking about Curry's performance and Lebron's disappearance over the regular season.
I have.Look up advanced stats.
No, injured. Which is why he took two weeks off earlier this year, to deal with injuries.Now you are using the injured excuse? Fatigued is the word you are looking for.
I agree. How does that change the fact the Warriors probably would be a playoff team without Curry but the Cavs wouldn't without James? And why do you keep bringing up Davis when he has nothing to do with this conversation?And the Pelicans would not be a playoff team without Anthony Davis.
Says the person who keeps referring to a third player.Your argument is weak.
Exactly my point.I'm sorry, but Durant won it last year.
Because LeBron winning another MVP isn't sexy. It's far more fun to give it to someone new.Why would they be tired of Lebron winning this year?
Oh, I know the award has always been ridiculous. Malone winning out over Jordan showed that to me at an early age.The award has always been like this.
No, I am not. I just recognize we're watching probably the greatest basketball player ever and I'm not going to say stupid things like others do.Yes you are.
History has shown you blaming everyone for Lebron's teams not winning.
No, I'm FAIRLY criticizing the awarding of Curry the MVP when LeBron is almost universally agreed to be the better basketball player and is the difference between a Cavs team who misses the playoffs and a Cavs team who has made it to the Finals.You are the one unfairly critiszing the awarding of Curry's MVP because of your fanboyism.
Except that's not my argument and you're showing more dishonesty by trying to pass it off as my argument. My argument is that he's the best player AND he's more valuable to his team, as evidenced by the Cavs in the playoffs/finals and the Heat sitting at home.Your argument that the MVP award should go to the best player only is weak.
I'm not a fanboy. And you're an idiot. You keep saying things which are provably false, because it's clear you're part of the "anybody but LeBron" bandwagon. And hey, that's fine if you want to mindlessly put down Lebron, you're far from the only one. It doesn't change the fact you're wrong and when you continue to make provably false statements, it just makes you look stupid.You are just a salty fanboy.
The NBA really needs to do something about that stupid fucking foul Steph Curry draws like, 12 times a game where he literally jumps into a defender after pump faking. He got two crucial free throws and sent JR Smith to the bench last night when all Smith did was go up in the air to try to block a shot. It's not his fault Steph Curry decided to fling himself at him.
And you cannot be this dense to realize you are bringing up performances after the award has been decided which is irrelevant in this conversation.You cannot be this dense...
LeBron James didn't just suddenly become this valuable to the Cavaliers. He's been this valuable all along. The playoffs are only acting as a shining example of it. I do not understand why you are struggling so mightily with this rather simple concept.
Both players added value tot he team. Lebron is the best player. Curry had the best season. The award is mostly based on the past regular season performances. I don't know why you can't seem to grasp that concept.Well, if it's not based on value brought to the team and it's not based on who the best player in the game is, then what exactly can it be based on which doesn't make it a complete joke?
19-19 for a championship contender was an awful start. Being awful for 38 games out of a 82 game season. You can't blame all that on James being injured.They were 34-10 after James returned from his roughly two week injury rest (on Jan 13), a .773 winning percentage. They were 19-19 when he returned. They won 12 of their first 13 games after he returned and went 1-7 during the time James sat out.
It would be nice if you'd at least check what you were saying before you said it.
Most new players need time to adjust to a new team.They traded for Smith and Shumpert and Mozgov on Jan 7. James didn't return healthy until Jan 13.
The team was underperforming rather than below average.And LeBron's presence transformed his team from below average to great.
See the difference?
He's still young and his importance is already comparable to a young Lebron's to the Cavs a decade ago. Don't forget the West is far more competitive to get into the playoffs.And yet, his team barely snuck into the playoffs and got demolished.
Could have added a couple of more points to his average.He averaged four less minutes a game. That's it.
Nobody is disputing that Lebron is the best player here. You seem to think I think Lebron is some scrub. My argument with you is you are disregarding every other players claim to the MVP award just because Lebron is the best player.And he plays point forward and small forward...in other words, he's far more versatile both offensively and defensively...which is more valuable.
No. Stating the difference in playing style result in different kind of shots.So because Curry isn't as good at creating shots in close, we should just give him a pass?
The example is to show that you using FG% as a blanket comparison for players taking different type of shots is a terrible example.DeAndre Jordan requires someone to pass him the ball. LeBron James doesn't. That's a terrible example.
You mean people aren't enamored with Lebron's dunks and athleticism? Now you are claiming Lebron's points aren't flashy? Seems like you are clutching at straws.Because Curry's points are flashy. LeBron's aren't. People love the 3pt basket. They're not quite so enamored with the 15 foot jumper or the fall away post shot.
Yet you fail to see why Curry deserves the award this year.I have.
No, injured. Which is why he took two weeks off earlier this year, to deal with injuries.
You are assuming the Warriors would be a playoff team but the West is ultra competitive. Who knew an injury to Durant would cost OKC a spot in the playoffs? The Cavs would have made the playoffs even without James. Pretty sure a healthy Kevin Love and Kyrie duo can get more wins than the Nets this season. I brought up Davis because you said no other player bring more value to their team as James, which clearly is false.I agree. How does that change the fact the Warriors probably would be a playoff team without Curry but the Cavs wouldn't without James? And why do you keep bringing up Davis when he has nothing to do with this conversation?
Still doesn't disprove that your argument is weak.Says the person who keeps referring to a third player.
Your point might sound credible if the past two winners didn't perform as well as they did.Exactly my point.
Because LeBron winning another MVP isn't sexy. It's far more fun to give it to someone new.
And that clouded your opinion on what the award should be about.Oh, I know the award has always been ridiculous. Malone winning out over Jordan showed that to me at an early age.
You are saying something rather stupid by saying Lebron should win the award over another player that outperformed him in the regular. Not Curry's or the voters fault that Lebron decided to coast for half the season. Lebron is that good that he can coast and still be in the MVP conversation.No, I am not. I just recognize we're watching probably the greatest basketball player ever and I'm not going to say stupid things like others do.
I still remember you blaming coach Spol whenever the Heat lose.
What? I don't even know where to begin with such a stupid comment. I put the blame for wins and losses where it belongs. I think you might have me confused with someone else.
Lebron played hard for half the season and deserve to get the award over players that played for the full season?No, I'm FAIRLY criticizing the awarding of Curry the MVP when LeBron is almost universally agreed to be the better basketball player and is the difference between a Cavs team who misses the playoffs and a Cavs team who has made it to the Finals.
By this logic James Harden would have a better claim than Lebron to the award. Oops, can't bring up a third player. You are penalizing Curry for being in a better team for the award. Another dumb thing to say.Except that's not my argument and you're showing more dishonesty by trying to pass it off as my argument. My argument is that he's the best player AND he's more valuable to his team, as evidenced by the Cavs in the playoffs/finals and the Heat sitting at home.
I didn't put Lebron down. You are the one discrediting the accomplishments of another player to prop up the target of your fanboysim. Your point is nobody but Lebron deserves the MVP award because he is the best player. That is just idiotic when clearly Durant and Curry had seasons that were comparable to Lebron's the years they won it.I'm not a fanboy. And you're an idiot. You keep saying things which are provably false, because it's clear you're part of the "anybody but LeBron" bandwagon. And hey, that's fine if you want to mindlessly put down Lebron, you're far from the only one. It doesn't change the fact you're wrong and when you continue to make provably false statements, it just makes you look stupid.
How is one game or one series proof that he should have been MVP of an award based on 82 games?Oh, and I didn't see the game last night, but reading the news article, it appeared that, once again, LeBron proved why he should have been MVP.
The NBA really needs to do something about that stupid fucking foul Steph Curry draws like, 12 times a game where he literally jumps into a defender after pump faking. He got two crucial free throws and sent JR Smith to the bench last night when all Smith did was go up in the air to try to block a shot. It's not his fault Steph Curry decided to fling himself at him.
And...I'm done with this nonsense. I'm not, nor have I ever, said James performance in the playoffs should be retroactively applied to MVP voting. You've made that up, as you've made up many other things. My point, as I've made it multiple times, is quite clear to anyone interested in honest discussion.And you cannot be this dense to realize you are bringing up performances after the award has been decided which is irrelevant in this conversation.
It is. MVP voting has no criteria because those who vote for MVP don't want to be held accountable for their vote. They want to vote for whomever they simply happen to like best, within reason. If the award is not given to the best player and it's not given to one who means the most to any team he plays on, then what exactly is the award about?MVP voting in most sports is screwed up.
Either the NBA or the college game was supposed to have a rule change this season to eliminate this. But I've seen it in both college and NBA, so I'm not sure how well it's been enforced.The NBA really needs to do something about that stupid fucking foul Steph Curry draws like, 12 times a game where he literally jumps into a defender after pump faking. He got two crucial free throws and sent JR Smith to the bench last night when all Smith did was go up in the air to try to block a shot. It's not his fault Steph Curry decided to fling himself at him.
They want to vote for whomever they simply happen to like best, within reason.
You brought up Lebron's playoff performances as justification for why it was a sham he didn't win the award. I didn't make that up. You are retroactively applying what he did after the award was decided to push his claim over other players.And...I'm done with this nonsense. I'm not, nor have I ever, said James performance in the playoffs should be retroactively applied to MVP voting. You've made that up, as you've made up many other things. My point, as I've made it multiple times, is quite clear to anyone interested in honest discussion.
Classic Slyfox. Can't see past his own hubris.If you'd like me to respond to anything else you've said, have the intellectual honesty to address what I've actually said, not the stupid things you keep claiming I've said.
Really? The voters are such empty voids of humanity that despite their basketball knowledge that they spend their lives making a living on, they vote on their favorite.
....within reason.
Is the average age of the voters eight?
I mean, one of them voted Carmelo over Lebron to keep Lebron from being the first unanimous MVP. You decide.
Maybe he thought Melo was more valuable to that Knicks team than Lebron is to the Heat?
Like say that Heat team would have been a playoff team without Lebron but that Knicks team would have missed the playoffs without Melo.![]()