To demonstrate the value he brings to the team.
Which isn't part of the criteria for regular season MVP decisions because...wait for it...the votes were decided before the performances you highlighted.
If the MVP is for season performance, then Steph Curry should not have won. But people vote MVP based on value to the team...and showing LeBron taking a depleted Cavs team to the NBA Finals demonstrates the value of LeBron to the Cavs.
If you want to pick a player that carried a depleted team deep into the playoffs based on regular season performance, James Harden would have been a better pick.
You are generalizing what people vote the MVP based on. Also, you are again bringing up playoff performances into a regular season award.
LeBron wasn't healthy. Once LeBron was healthy, the Cavs were powerful. Which, once again, demonstrates the value of LeBron.
Even healthy there were playing badly. It wasn't until the Cavs fixed their lack of rim protection and added another wing defender that the Cavs became great.
No, I'm saying LeBron is the best player in the league and no one brings more value to a club than he does.
Yes Lebron is the best player, no one is disputing that. But Curry's improvement has transformed his team from good to elite.
Anthony Davis at the Pelicans bring more value to his team than any other player.
Okay.
How does that make sense at all?
Curry sat out more 4th quarters than Lebron where he could have padded his stats more. Lebron plays powerforward at some points in most games and is attacking closer to the basket. Deadre Jordan has a better FG% compared to Kyle Kover due to difference in positions and what they are asked to do. FG% comparisons isn't just raw numbers.
More people were talking about Curry's performance and Lebron's disappearance over the regular season.
And still had stats every bit as good as Curry's, if not better.
Look up advanced stats.
LeBron was injured. And still put up great stats.
Now you are using the injured excuse? Fatigued is the word you are looking for.
Everyone keeps saying LeBron is clearly the best player in the league. The Cavs were not a playoff team without him. So it makes no sense how the best player in the league who obviously means so much to his team isn't the most valuable player.
And the Pelicans would not be a playoff team without Anthony Davis. Your argument is weak. Again the criteria for MVP over the regular season differs from voters to voters. Some view it as an award for the best performer, not the best player.
It just clearly shows people are tired of LeBron winning and want anyone else to be the MVP. We saw it with Michael Jordan and we see it again this year.
I'm sorry, but Durant won it last year. Why would they be tired of Lebron winning this year? When clearly his team didn't perform as well as Curry's and Curry was just as valuable to his team as Lebron is to his?
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying it makes the award a joke if this is the rationale.
The award has always been like this. Great players having great seasons with a great narrative. I guess that makes Lebron's MVP awards a joke as well since there were times other players were more valuable to their teams than Lebron. Just because you want what the award to represent doesn't it has to be that.
So because he didn't play as well as LeBron the last few years, he should get the award this year because he almost did this year?
No. He had a great season and his team had a great season therefore he is a deserving winner.
Who is putting down Curry? I'm just saying he's not as valuable to the Warriors as LeBron is to the Cavaliers. And since everyone seems to agree LeBron is the best player in the world, it makes no sense to me how someone who brings so much to every team he plays on and is the best player in the world is not the MVP every year.
Again go look up advanced stats and tell me Curry isn't as valuable to the Warriors. The issue is with you and not the award if you are the one that can't make sense of the award.
I think it's funny how you keep using that term, as if it's remotely true. I'm not a LeBron fanboy, I'm just not one of those stupid people who criticize him unfairly.
Yes you are. History has shown you blaming everyone for Lebron's teams not winning. I am not critisizing Lebron. You are the one unfairly critiszing the awarding of Curry's MVP because of your fanboyism.
Except he wasn't AND he had a better team around him.
Again go look up advanced stats. So you are penalizing Curry for making his team better? Does that mean Lebron shouldn't win those MVPs when he had Wade and Bosh with him?
Face it. Your argument that the MVP award should go to the best player only is weak. Let's say Lebron played half a season and put up great stats, shoudl he win the MVP award?
Curry was a deserving winner this year. You are just a salty fanboy.