..In comparison to the other names he was inducted alongside with?
For many years a lot of big great names have been inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame, and many big names have been the money drawing name for the event, as well as the last person to be inducted of the night in order to make the biggest deal out of said person. We've had Shawn Michaels last year, Stone Cold Steve Austin and many more names that have been some of the most outstanding and well known names in the wrestling industry.
Now, alongside with every Hall of Fame headlining name, a list of other names are presented every year to be inducted as well, some names aren't even featured on the main show (Or I've simply been watching some bad uploads!), and some featured but nowhere to the same extend of the headliners, who clearly gets a long period of time to talk about their career and histories to share with the future Hall of Famers, or just for general purposes of sharing.
The headlining names have always been more or less the obvious choice in comparison to the others, but some years we've had numerous big world wide stars inducted (2006 with Bret Hart and Eddie Guerrero for example). Now that would be what brings me to the actual question of this thread:
What Hall of Fame headlining name deserved to headline the most in comparison to the names he was inducted along with?
What Hall of Fame headlining name deserved the least to headline in comparison to some of the names he was inducted along with?

For many years a lot of big great names have been inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame, and many big names have been the money drawing name for the event, as well as the last person to be inducted of the night in order to make the biggest deal out of said person. We've had Shawn Michaels last year, Stone Cold Steve Austin and many more names that have been some of the most outstanding and well known names in the wrestling industry.
Now, alongside with every Hall of Fame headlining name, a list of other names are presented every year to be inducted as well, some names aren't even featured on the main show (Or I've simply been watching some bad uploads!), and some featured but nowhere to the same extend of the headliners, who clearly gets a long period of time to talk about their career and histories to share with the future Hall of Famers, or just for general purposes of sharing.
The headlining names have always been more or less the obvious choice in comparison to the others, but some years we've had numerous big world wide stars inducted (2006 with Bret Hart and Eddie Guerrero for example). Now that would be what brings me to the actual question of this thread:
What Hall of Fame headlining name deserved to headline the most in comparison to the names he was inducted along with?
What Hall of Fame headlining name deserved the least to headline in comparison to some of the names he was inducted along with?