Read it again.
I don't want to speak for someone else, but I'm doing it anyways.
He's just making a similarity, or a connection, sort of.
He's saying, Ultimate Warrior thought he deserved more, but he was already bringing so much money to the company.
Vince is definitely not dumb, and Warrior brought in TONS of money for the WWF. Matt Hardy gets pops, but I think it's because of his brother. Matt Hardy is NOT draw to this company. He doesn't sell as much as Warrior, and he never will.
I found the wording odd, thus my confusion.
Yes, Flawless was correct. The connection I was making was more for someone saying that letting go of Hardy would be bad, because he gets a good reaction.
Well its bigger than that. People like Matt Hardy, and he could be a champion if done correctly. But of course hes no where near Warrior, better comparisons could be made.
Well so did Warrior, and he was fired. Company did fine without him too. Warrior's pop dwarfs Hardy's also.
Of course, but he was also bat shit crazy. Letting go of Hardy would still be a bad move, as He'll just join TNA and having both Hardy's is bound to be some sort of a draw, seeing as they still have their fanbase. We dont see it with Jeff, but that could be because they simply tune in to both shows because the Hardy's are on 2 shows. If theyre on one the both may lose some sort of percentage of viewer ship.
The point I was trying to make was that if firing someone who says they are not getting what they deserve (Warrior) didn't effect the company..
It wont in a big way, but it woulds still be a bad move on their parts.
How would letting go of Hardy be so bad? He's not a top draw. Never has been,
Hes never been given the chance to be one. You could have said the same thing about Jeff before he became champion. Also remember back when they originally released Matt and the IWC and fans started the huge movement to bring him back? He could have very well been a main-eventer right now if they hadnt used it to put over Edge.
never will be anywhere else.
Thats a little presumptuous dont you think?
Even TNA has WAY better talent then him. So what would make him so important there?
Lol, Im not saying hes the best, but a lot of TNA's talent is shit in comparison to Matt. And what would make him important? Being Matt Hardy. If shit like Tommy Dreamer and Rob Van Dam can be in the main events or upper midcarders so can Matt Hardy.
When they got guys like AJ, Kurt, Pope and many others who kick Matt's ass not only with ring ability, but with promo ability.
Big deal, having way more talented wrestlers like Angle on the card didnt stop RVD from becoming champ. Besides, Matt being let go would be bad regardless. They could keep him on as a midcarder and simply suspend him, no need to let go of him.