If both of you want to be wrong, that's cool with me. It's not like I've never proven you wrong before.
Explain to me how Bourne losing his first title in his 4 years in WWE and beng suspended for 60 days isn't being held accountable for his actions.
According to both the law, and the WWE Wellness policy, they do. And that's all that matters here. We could talk about how our jobs wouldn't allow us these chances, I know I wouldn't my staff. But the point is that WWE policy does allow for that third chance, so why should Bourne be different?
Life isn't fair. As much as I abhor drug usage, I feel it's a victimless crime. But someone who's caught using thrice could get life in jail, while a stone cold killer could get out in 25 years. What we think is right or wrong
isn't how the world works, nor is it how the WWE Wellness policy works.
This all goes to personal preference, I suppose. In my eyes, Matthew Korklan is an exceptional talent who can do things in the ring that no one else on the roster can approach doing. And again, being suspended for 60 days, publicly at that, is certainly being made an example of.
Or ask Randy Orton, whose served the same suspensions as Evan Bourne is currently serving. People are so quick to point out those who aren't the best examples, but fail to mention how these suspensions have benefited some. Randy Orton is a perfect example of someone whose turned things around as a result of his suspensions. Whose to say Bourne can't be the same?
And Angle and Hardy haven't exactly skated by. I seem to recall Hardy being suspended for a long time from TNA, and spending time in jail as well. From all reports, he's turned his life around. Another example of someone whose screwed up, and has learned important life lessons as a result.
As much as I'm chagrined to admit it, I'll give you Kurt Angle.
The important thing here is that this is your
opinion, not a fact. You admit as much here. I suggested he be used as a jobber when he returns as well, and earns his way back. But why in the word would you use him as a jobber if when returning, he passes every test with flying colors, and proves himself to management once again? Again, back to the Wellness Policy. He's afforded that third chance, so if he takes advantage of it, and follows the rules, why should he be released?
Again, this is a case of opinion, not of fact in any way. We don't know what Bourne was suspended for this time. It could be something as simple as he had a prescription for pain killers, but couldn't produce the proof in time. That's what happened to Rey Mysterio, and Chavo Guerrero as well. Did they have a sense of entitlement? No, they were caught in unfortunate situations, nothing more.
The point is, the facts have yet to come out. Suppose your right, and Bourne in his arrogance and sense of entitlement was busted for the
exact same thing. However wrong he would be for that, it would hypocritical to release him when the policy states otherwise, and others have been given that third chance as well.
Job him out for some time? Sure. But take away his job? Within the walls of his employer, that's what would truly be flat out
wrong.