Lesnar VS HHH Again!?

[ChrisHelms]

I really wish this feud would of been over at Mania; however, Heyman's intro promo into the steel cage match was beyond amazing. I'm hoping for a really bloody, old school match; although I don't see why they couldn't go with HIAC. Maybe they are saving it for a later date?

Lesnar has to win this match to give any sort of revelancy to his candidacy to headline Mania next year.

 

[Flash H]

I agree that Lesnar needs to go over in this match. One thing I really don't want to see is Lesnar break HHH's arm again. This would put him out for a while, but then Hunter would come back and they wond have HHH/Lesnar IV. I would've settled for this ending at Wrestlemania. If this is gonna be a great match, it needs blood and some other catch other than Lesnar re-breaking Triple H's arm for the 4th time.

 

[Mitch Henessey]

Lesnar has to win round three, and to be more frank, I think he has to destroy Triple H at Extreme Rules. I mean, Lesanr really has to beat the shit out of him. Lesnar can't lose to Triple H twice in a row, and maintain his status as The Beast. It can't happen. To add to that, I wouldn't be surprised if Lesnar "puts Triple H out of action" for a while by severely injuring him inside the cage. Hopefully, Triple H won't deliver another "I'm not going to retire, but I'm thinking about it" speech afterwards, because it'll just be overkill.

Triple H being locked in the cage with an animal like Lesnar creates the perfect hostile setting, and I expect another brutal battle between these two. Lesnar obviously needs the win for another spark, and beating a surefire Hall Of Famer and thirteen-time world champion inside a steel cage will do that for him. Then again, I don't think we NEED to be here right now. This feud could've and probably should've ended after Summerslam, when Lesnar broke Triple H's arm for the second time. Oh well.

One a side note, a part of me expected some kind of swerve next week, where Triple H comes out and says something along the lines of "I've already beaten you, so I don't have anything to prove to you." But it's not in Triple H's character to say something like that. He's just too stubborn and too proud to back down from a challenge.

 

[Mitch Henessey]

Well, I just thought of something I didn't consider the first time around. By all rights this feud shouldn't have gone any further than Wrestlemania 29, but maybe Triple H VS Lesnar III is a Plan B for Rock's injury? The rumors swirling around about Lesnar attacking Rock on last Monday's Raw was supposed to be the first major development in a storyline for a future match between both men. But now Rock is on the shelf, and who knows, he probably wrestled his last match at this year's Mania.

Lesnar needs an opponent, he needs to regain momentum, and you can't just throw anybody in there against Lesnar. Triple H fits the profile for the select few, who are threats to Brock's size and power. Sure, you could probably make an argument for guys like Orton or Sheamus, but they would have to lose, and in the end, a match with Lesnar would hurt them in the grand scheme of things.

 

[willross]

Simple. Rock was supposed to be on this card, he is injured. So they stack it to get some extra buys and culminate the HHH/Lesnar rivalry.

Rather it happen now and get it over with. Makes Lesnar and HHH's futures a more unpredictable rather than sitting here waiting for the rubber match that we know will happen and is completely necessary, story wise.

They had good matches before. Now they will have what will be at the very least, a completely different match inside a steel cage.

If Lesnar loses than I will have something completely different to say. I see this as a way for Lesnar to get the win, in a competitive match that we are now programmed to know he could possibly lose, and allow him to move on with no loose ends. Booing 101.

 

[Kidpolean]

Why are people complaining about this match happening again...how many times did we sit through Austin vs Rock, HBK vs Taker, HHH vs Rock, Punk vs Cena... Its wrestling you will always see rematches

 

[The Eighties]

I don't mind this because Lesnar will rightfully be winning and sending HHH back to the boardroom. The way Heyman built to it you'd think they were going to have a Taipei death match contested in a circle of fire.

I hope they at least remove the escape stipulation and maybe even pins, make it that giving up is the only way to get out of the cage.

 

[mrppv420]

I don't mind this because Lesnar will rightfully be winning and sending HHH back to the boardroom. The way Heyman built to it I thought they were going to have a Taipei death match contested in a circle of fire.

I hope they at least remove the escape stipulation and maybe even pins, make it that giving up is the only way to get out of the cage.

Man, a Taipei Death Match between Lesnar and HHH would be a good one. I remember the one ECW did with Ian and Axl Rotten I wanna say around '95. That was fun to watch, though, a lot of blood, the thing I'd worry with Lesnar and HHH doing that match would be somebody losing too much blood.

 

[James]

Why are people complaining about this match happening again...how many times did we sit through Austin vs Rock, HBK vs Taker, HHH vs Rock, Punk vs Cena... Its wrestling you will always see rematches

What in the 1000 hells?

Those matches actually meant something, had the title added to it, and many more. During those feuds they were the main event. Whereas, this is just. No, I really mean it, it's just.

Bad bad bad comparison.

 

[The Eighties]

Man, a Taipei Death Match between Lesnar and HHH would be a good one. I remember the one ECW did with Ian and Axl Rotten I wanna say around '95. That was fun to watch, though, a lot of blood, the thing I'd worry with Lesnar and HHH doing that match would be somebody losing too much blood.

They'd need an actual crime scene clean up crew on hand if that match ever took place, Brock is way too stiff to work with sharp objects. I do hope WWE wave their "no blood" policy for this one though as a bloodless cage match with these two just wouldn't seem right.

 

[shooter_mcgavin]

I don't mind having a rematch if anything I welcome it provided Lesnar goes over the rubber match. WWE is coughing up big money on Lesnar to work on limited dates and it would be wise in a business point of view to make him as dominant and threatening as possible.

Triple H will probably be working less and less matches as time goes on while Lesnar can work on a yearly contract. It makes me believe Lesnar will be more matches and programs than Triple H in the long run since he will be involved in more backstage stuff so it's best that Lesnar comes out on top after their feud.

Lesnar's record since returning 1-2, not really a record where you can say that he's dominant right?

 

[Jack-Hammer]

Well, I just thought of something I didn't consider the first time around. By all rights this feud shouldn't have gone any further than Wrestlemania 29, but maybe Triple H VS Lesnar III is a Plan B for Rock's injury?

Probably. The Rock probably won't be wrestling again until, at the very least, SummerSlam. Given his injury, however, I'm not sure if he will wrestle again. This injury could have put a major, major kink into The Rock's movie career, as he has a big budget movie with him playing Hercules lined up. With CM Punk taking time off, WWE putting Lesnar & Triple H onto the card in a rubber match due to star power makes sense.

As for the match itself, I have to admit that I'm not totally sold on the steel cage bit. Not that I don't enjoy steel cage matches but, personally, I hope that Triple H comes out next week or whatever and ups the ante by saying he'll face Lesnar but he wants it to be inside Hell in a Cell. There's just more overall freedom and HIAC is a great way to ultimately blow off a feud between them.

Given that this is taking place at Extreme Rules, there's a good chance there'll be blood. As for who should win, I think Lesnar needs this. The real reason they have Lesnar in the first place is so he can help jack up ppv buys. Having him lose to Triple H in back to back no DQ matches will hurt Lesnar in terms of drawing power, in my opinion. Trips has shown that he can beat Lesnar, so his own sense of ego is in tact, so now it's time to protect the major investment that WWE has put into Lesnar by having Trips lose this match in a major & decisive way.

 

[MCMG]

I'm defiantly looking forward to this match. Their WM29 match was good but they were holding back. I was expecting them to go all out and truly hurt each other. This cage match is the perfect opportunity for them to properly put on a show.

As for the winner, it is difficult to predict but I think Lesnar wins in a dubious fashion. Perhaps the Shield getting involved as they foreshadowed that on Smackdown. Lesnar cannot loose clean and I can't see the point of letting HHH get beat down by Lesnar. This leans me towards an outside interference and a Lesnar win.

 

[Gentleman]

This rematch is going to be great, and I hope to see several more frankly. Make it 5 out of 7.

One comment on the steel cage gimmick. It's a bullshit stip if you don't have some color in the match. I want to see some blading. I expect I will if Cena v Brock is any indicator.

 

[donfryeismyhero]

Lesnar has to win round three, and to be more frank, I think he has to destroy Triple H at Extreme Rules. I mean, Lesanr really has to beat the shit out of him. Lesnar can't lose to Triple H twice in a row, and maintain his status as The Beast. It can't happen. To add to that, I wouldn't be surprised if Lesnar "puts Triple H out of action" for a while by severely injuring him inside the cage. Hopefully, Triple H won't deliver another "I'm not going to retire, but I'm thinking about it" speech afterwards, because it'll just be overkill.

Triple H being locked in the cage with an animal like Lesnar creates the perfect hostile setting, and I expect another brutal battle between these two. Lesnar obviously needs the win for another spark, and beating a surefire Hall Of Famer and thirteen-time world champion inside a steel cage will do that for him.

Completely agree with you here. And if the rumors of Batista coming back to feud with Brock are true, then this match would be the perfect set up for his return to come to the aid of his fallen Evolution comrade.

 

[Flash H]

Now, after thinking about this, I see Triple H coming out and accepting Lesnar's challenge.

I then see Lesnar and Heyman walking away from the ring and HHH gets the mic and says to put a roof on the cage and make it a Hell in a Cell match.

If they want a violent natch, it needs blood or to just be more of an extreme match. Saying Lesnar wants a Steel Cage match so HHH can't run away doesn't make much sense to me. When has HHH ran away from him before?

However, it is gonna be interesting to see how WWE plays this one out. It needs a better build than HHH just coming and accepting Lesnar's challenge then having another match with the same build.

 

[HBsam31]

I am not against this match happening, but it really should have just ended after Mania. Brock needs to win this one though. Like someone else said, he is 1-2 since returning, and he needs to take HHH out here. I think he also needs to win convincingly. The two put on pretty good matches and it seems Lesner needs an opponent so why not have the rubber match now.

 

[WWE4EVA!]

Two things

1. Lesnar should win this match but I don`t see Triple H letting that happen with him having such a big ego.

2. If they knew there was going to be a 3rd match in the rivalry why did they use the "If Triple H loses he is fired from WWE"Stipulation at WrestleMania instead of having it in the what I hope will be the final match at Extreme Rules.

 

[TheEraofAwesome]

It's absolutely baffling on how the WWE misused Lesnar the way they have. Lesnar's record as I type this post since his WWE return is 1-2. If the idea was to build a Lesnar vs. Undertaker match at WrestleMania 30, then Lesnar should be 3-0. But, since WWE can't book themselves out of a wet paper bag, Lesnar has lost twice. Not to mention, both times didn't make the slightest bit of sense on why he lost.

What was the purpose of the man losing to Cena on his return match? It killed any type of mystique Lesnar had within his return. Not to mention, he dominated Cena throughout the match, only to receive a knockout punch with a wrapped chain, followed by an FU on the steel steps. Why did Lesnar have to lose? It was that detrimental if Cena would've lost? It still bothers me a year after it happened.

Now, Lesnar enters in, in my opinion a horrible feud, with HHH. I, unfortunately, was there to witness both their matches live. Neither were any good. Their Summerslam match was ok, but their WrestleMania match was sub par at best. Their WrestleMania match was the career threatening match, so it should've ended there with Lesnar winning. He would've at least had credibility. Now, even if Lesnar wins at Extreme Rulez, where do you go from here? Lesnar has been handled poorly to a point where I don't care about him. The sad part is - I am a fan of his. I was there live when he came back and F5ed Cena. It was a crazy moment. Nowhere near now, because of this horrendous feud.

 

[CrucifiedRaven]

Perhaps the Shield getting involved as they foreshadowed that on Smackdown. Lesnar cannot loose clean and I can't see the point of letting HHH get beat down by Lesnar. This leans me towards an outside interference and a Lesnar win.

This is what probably happens.
They need to put Lesnar over Triple H, because he's the bigger money maker this year, not Triple H. They also need to end this feud. I don't see a way for Lesnar to win... without Triple H's character logically wanting another fight.

Maybe it's not The Shield. But there should be some big swerve or outside interference. This allows Lesnar to go over and gives Triple H something else to focus on whenever he comes back. It would also be cool for The Shield and Brock Lesnar to be aligned. Whether he's the leader/an official member/or just an allegiance, it would be badass to run the story of them destroying the WWE until SummerSlam.

It's been a while since they've had a legit main event heel stable. With Heyman, I think this would be money.

 

[Mustang Sally]

Lesnar should win this match but I don`t see Triple H letting that happen with him having such a big ego.

If that were so, I think Trips would have slated himself to be the guy who ended Undertaker's streak at WM28. As far as I can see, he does what's best for the company....and if that dictates he should lose the match in question, he'll do it.

The problem with Brock Lesnar is finding opponents to face him. Most guys are too small to make it look believable, or so large (and immobile) as to make for a bad match-up. There are relatively few people in WWE who could provide an attractive opponent for Lesnar.

Sure, if you want, you can go down the roster list and find opponents you think Brock could face.... but to draw for a PPV, you need someone who looks as if he could compete with Brock for real, without the high-flying maneuvers or ambush-type tactics that would look silly against a guy as big as Lesnar.

Guys like Triple H and John Cena are great opponents for Lesnar's size and style......but, we've already seen them in there with him. Still, the best strategy if Brock is to be used is to put these same people in with him again. Triple H vs. Brock is an old-style, grind 'em up wrestling match in which both men seem to hit each other harder than we see in most other pro wrestling contests. They were really clubbing each other at WM29 and I thought it was exciting as hell.

I've enjoyed it twice....and I'm gonna enjoy it a third time.

And yes, Brock wins.