Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If only someone had spent years and years telling people how good Miz really was while so many people were saying he had no place in WWE.
Considering he's still getting the biggest pops on the show, why is everybody so hot to lift the Smackdown belt off of Ambrose?
Someone say m'name?
Anyways this is an extremely important and time sensitive question and I really need a clarifying answer.
Why is Papa Shango the greatest in the history of pro wrestling?
Please answer in essay format.
Thank you Mr. Klunderbunker. Am I pronouncing that right?
Perhaps you haven't heard of a certain AJ Styles.
Well he should. He's a face.
Ok, so do we really need another 18 month heel reign like we got with Rollins (and we're likely to get again over on Raw)? Or do face champions just bore the Smarks to death?
Perhaps you haven't heard of a certain AJ Styles.
As someone who was there for the blowoff because Warrior vs. Shango, he certainly wasn't.
Not always. Ambrose doesn't feel like a top guy to me though. He doesn't have that alpha male feeling.
Does anybody on the roster? Hell, the only one I get that vibe from not named Cena, Orton, or Lesnar was Reigns and he's damaged goods at the moment (and may be for a LONG time).
Yeah but it's not something you can teach.
There you go then! Given what's on the roster at the moment Ambrose is as good as anyone; and he has the advantage of being way over, is a fun character, and is a face (which we've gotten precious little of the past five years).
For the record I never really got the "alpha male" vibe out of either Bob Backlund or Bret Hart and I thought they were just fine as champions.
Except for, you know, AJ.
Except that AJ is a heel (which we've had too much of over the past five years), isn't as over as Ambrose, and isn't exactly a "fun" character. Oh, and he's 39 with no long-term upside. And he doesn't exactly reek "alpha male" either.
Then put the title on him now because he's short term while Ambrose is long term. It makes perfect sense.
1. What's your opinion on SD's new titles being called the "Smackdown" Women's Championship and the "Smackdown" Tag Team Titles? I know its appropriate and accurate, but I'm not a fan. Seems lazy, as does their copycat designs.
2. I never understood why they made a new WWE Women's title when they replaced the Diva's title and discontinued the lineage of the old one from the 50's. It's literally called the same title, but its officially a different championship. Why'd they do that? Thought they loved trumpeting their history whenever they can.