Amongst the masses, Orton started to get over pretty well there toward the end of his reign, and I think a lot of people were secretly disappointed to see him drop the belt to Triple H...especially in place of Cena.
I'm not exactly keeping a secret with it. I was disappointed when Randy Orton lost the Championship to Triple H. The funny thing is, I was telling NorCal about a week back that I thought Triple H. would win the Championship.. then he replied with "Thats what they want you to think." So I really started thinking he's right, and Orton would retain to shock everyone and add more heat by retaining when everyone wants him to lose.
NorCal out-did himself, however, as he then went on to say the only reason he could see Triple H. win the Championship would be if they went on to push him against the likes of William Regal, J.B.L., and all the other top heels. (not counting Orton) By the looks of it, NorCal's assumption on this, was right.
The only reason I'm disappointed is I fail to see the point of Triple H. winning at Backlash, as opposed to winning at Mania. So this is what I've come to think.
1. Randy Orton made himself a top named heel, a Main Event heel, by retaining at Wrestlemania over arguably the two biggest (face) names in the business today, let alone, the two biggest names in the industry, period. So Triple H. won at a second-rate Pay Per View, because hes on his 12th Championship.. and people start to forget reigns 5-12.. so regardless of where it happens, it just becomes another number to add to how many he's received, not when, where, how & why.
2. Jake tipped on the thought that at Mania, the winner was the one who pinned someone first. Whereas at Backlash, it was an elimination match, which makes Triple H. look stronger than all three of the likes of Randy Orton, J.B.L. & John Cena. So naturally, if you wish to think Triple H. has tons of pull.. then this is why he won in a 4-way elimination match.
Personally, I still say its ******ed and stupid to have not just given Triple H. the Championship at Mania. Win or Lose, Orton won't be remembered as anything great.. even with a Mania victory. Orton's lost Mania chance was against the Undertaker, not H.H.H. & Cena.
And all placing the title on Triple H. now did.. was prolong the forseeable. Just like sooner or later, John Cena will win the Championship back.. whether its this year, or at next year's Wrestlemania.. it'll happen sooner or later.
Plus, it's a cage match. As much as any of us hate it, the common wrestling folk will think:
*OOOOOO CAGE....VIOLENCE*
I agree with this too. The old school wrestling industry used Steel Cage matches to be the violent and bloody end to every hardcore/heated type of feud. I think W.W.E. is just trying to make this feud look "old school" in ending it (assumably) inside a Steel Cage.
So, that automatically puts interest into the match. I think some wrestling fans would pay $39.95 to watch Mark Henry and Big Daddy V in a cage match, thus, explaining the reason for this match being booked.
Sadly I'd likely be one of them. I think the important issue needs to be that I'd buy any Pay Per View, regardless of how shitty the card was. I'm a die-hard wrestling fan.. and likely one of the only one's who orders every T.N.A. p.p.v. and W.W.E. p.p.v. simply because I love wrestling in general.
If I were to actually not order a Pay Per View because I felt the card was gonna be awful, then my collection wouldn't hold half as many T.N.A. p.p.v.'s as it does.. and it likely wouldn't even hold last year's Summerslam & Survivor Series events.