It's Wrestling, Not Shakespeare

[Con T.]

In all fairness, wrestling is a form of melodrama, akin to Shakespeare's theater. Just not as well acted.

 

[klunderbunker]

Are you that blind, or do you not see your sheer hypocrisy? I mean, for fuck's sake, not everybody in the world hates TNA, and you're doing the same thing with it that you're bitching about other people doing to WWE. Other people have just as much of a right to complain or show their distaste about a storyline or part of a storyline or gimmick or whatever in WWE that you do concerning TNA. No, they're not on the same level, but that doesn't matter. Seems to me that you would be pushing yourself to the front of the Vince Kiss My Ass Club line the way you bitch and moan about anybody that says anything negative about the almighty "E", but you just admitted to constantly talking negative about TNA. Oh, wait a minute, I get it. You're Mark Madden, aren't you?

No I'm simply smarter than you.

WWE is far better written, better acted, better put together and better performed in general and if you don't understand that you are a rather stupid person.

 

[ABMorales787]

WWE is far better written,

I'll give you that one.

better acted,

"I'm better than you!" "No, I'm better than you!"

I just impersonated 80% of WWE's storylines.

better put together

OK.

and better performed in general

A stomp!

Another stomp!

An Elevated DDT!

RKO!

and if you don't understand that you are a rather stupid person.

I no stoopid, I just slooow.

 

[Coco]

Sorry, I'm not going to lower my impossible standards because every other WWE critic spends their time arguing about the wrong things.

 

[shattered dreams]

If calling people idiots is the only way you can "defend" your hypocritical actions then maybe you should just own up. This isn't about WWE compared to TNA. This is about wrestling stories not being shakespeare. Why do you get to nitpick every detail of TNA stories but shit your pants when one thread pops up about one aspect of one story in WWE?

 

[D-Man]

"I'm better than you!" "No, I'm better than you!"

I just impersonated 80% of WWE's storylines.

Oh, but calling yourself "God" and an "ass hole" about 17,000 times per show is brilliant writing, right?

A stomp!

Another stomp!

An Elevated DDT!

RKO!

At least those actions look real to a viewer. I rarely see suplex/powerbomb combos in street fights.

 

[klunderbunker]

Sorry, I'm not going to lower my impossible standards because every other WWE critic spends their time arguing about the wrong things.

Very intelligent of you. No sarcasm.

 

[klunderbunker]

If calling people idiots is the only way you can "defend" your hypocritical actions then maybe you should just own up. This isn't about WWE compared to TNA. This is about wrestling stories not being shakespeare. Why do you get to nitpick every detail of TNA stories but shit your pants when one thread pops up about one aspect of one story in WWE?

Why are you talking? You're a stupid person and no one likes you.

 

[Coco]

The partisan hackery on both sides of the WWE-TNA debate here is laughable. The refusal of either side to acknowledge their complicity in this nonsense is even worse.

 

[klunderbunker]

The partisan hackery on both sides of the WWE-TNA debate here is laughable. The refusal of either side to acknowledge their complicity in this nonsense is even worse.

This is true, but why should I have to be unbiased? I never claim anywhere that I am.

 

[shattered dreams]

Actually you routinely claim you like or want to like TNA. If you are saying you are obviously biased against it then that is a pretty weird way to go about those claims.

 

[D-Man]

This is about wrestling stories not being shakespeare. Why do you get to nitpick every detail of TNA stories but shit your pants when one thread pops up about one aspect of one story in WWE?

I really hope this was just your way of throwing back in our faces what we always say to you.

 

[Coco]

This is true, but why should I have to be unbiased? I never claim anywhere that I am.

A lack of bias lends credibility to one's words. That's normally a good reason.

 

[klunderbunker]

A lack of bias lends credibility to one's words. That's normally a good reason.

True, but at the same time if that's all you need then why not have a machine say everything so it's fair and balanced?

 

[Coco]

True, but at the same time if that's all you need then why not have a machine say everything so it's fair and balanced?

Because people think they're important and want to be part of the process.

 

[klunderbunker]

Isn't that the point of this place?

 

[D-Man]

WZ is the centerpiece for hypocrisy by most. Posters' minds change like the wind blows... or when storylines change on TV.

 

[Coco]

Isn't that the point of this place?

Exactly why this place should be shut down.

 

[klunderbunker]

To censor freedom of idiotic speech?

 

[Coco]

Exactly.

 

[klunderbunker]

Did you and I just come dangerously close to having a conversation?

 

[Coco]

Yep. While I was simultaneously attempting to trump your self-righteousness.

 

[shattered dreams]

WZ is the centerpiece for hypocrisy by most. Posters' minds change like the wind blows... or when storylines change on TV.

Actually I do not think I have ever seen anyone change their mind about anything on WZ, at least not in the short-term. Makes you wonder why we waste our time with these so called discussions to begin with.

 

[klunderbunker]

Yep. While I was simultaneously attempting to trump your self-righteousness.

This can never be mentioned again. It would only create chaos.

 

[justinsayne]

The real question is, why don't the women wrestle in the kitchen? Or have a sandwich-making match?

My GF saw this post, she then got pissed and punch the screen on my laptop, thanks Noah, now seriously enough of this shit, you're not funny, never were, just annoying as all hell...

Fucking hilarious that kb posted this after his post-bfg behavior regarding TNA or really just his posts towards TNA in general. It really amazes me that many of you think there is no double standard in the way you critique both companies.

I've said this before, WWE does do alot of stupid shit, prolly as much stupid shit as TNA, the difference is WWE has a built in audience that is going nowhere, they have 4 weekly shows, with 6+ hrs. of programming, so they can get away with doing stupid shit cause all that programming dilutes the stupidity factor, where TNA does the same amount of stupid shit in only 1 2r. block, making it far more (& painfully) obvious

If calling people idiots is the only way you can "defend" your hypocritical actions then maybe you should just own up. This isn't about WWE compared to TNA. This is about wrestling stories not being shakespeare. Why do you get to nitpick every detail of TNA stories but shit your pants when one thread pops up about one aspect of one story in WWE?

A.) If you and others TNA loyalists (*NOT SAYING ALL TNA FANS ARE IDIOTS*) are going to continue to present yourselves as idiots, than people are going to continue to refer to you as idiots

B.)Because everyone is allowed to have an opinion, and when those opinions are presented in respectable fashion people tend to ya know.... respect them more....

Actually you routinely claim you like or want to like TNA. If you are saying you are obviously biased against it then that is a pretty weird way to go about those claims.

You know it is possible to want to like a company because you see a lot of good talent on the roster and loads of potential in the company but not be able to stomach the shit product said company currently continues to put out on a weekly basis... just ya know sayin'...