Just because other people do dirt, doesn't mean it's ok when you do it. That's like saying it was ok that you robbed that bank because other criminals have done much worse.
Never said it was ok on Hogan's part or anyone's part, I am just pointing out that is just the nature of the entertainment beast, period.
I have no direct proof that Hulk Hogan and Robert Roode aren't cyborgs from another planet, but I see, I hear, I read and I have been watching for many, many years. I think between all those I can form a reasonable opinion. If I'm wrong, fine. My opinion is only my opinion in the first place.
And that's fine, but I am going to argue and challenge that point, plain and simple.
I was being generous to include those two. Even if I were to go with your logic, it's still pretty damn pathetic on his part as far as giving back to the youngsters. If Roode's not the guy, fine....then who's the guy? When has Hogan created a star?
Guys like Warrior, Goldberg and Lesnar had more legitimacy added to their characters BECAUSE they beat Hogan. If these guys were just coming out of nowhere there'd be little to no point in having them beat Hogan, I'm a Hogan mark so be it, but even if I weren't I would have to say that you should only have certain people beat the Hulk Hogan character, plain and simple. And at various points and times those three were the characters that were qualified to receive that honor.
Ok, what part of a gimmick involves consistently degrading a wrestler that is not only no longer relevant, but by all accounts never did a thing to hurt your "character" other than fictitiously beat you? I could understand if Warrior was a bad guy and beat Hogan. Then it'd be an example of another evil guy thinking he's going to kill Hulkamania, blah, blah, etc. They were both faces. What's the benefit?
If anyone's ever heard half the stuff the Warrior has said about people it's warranted, that's of course if it's true and not just part of the script. If you listened to half of the stuff Warrior says you'd realize that
I don't think anyone is infallible, especially Hogan. In fact, I think that's my point. He's an proven opportunist. Yeah people make mistakes and Hogan's just happened to have been ruthless politicking.
And again I still say give me more proof than tabloid BS and bitter shoot interviews from disheveled and washed up has beens that couldn't save their own money. Yeah, like I've told other people on these forums I'm not saying that Hulk Hogan hasn't played his hand and taken advantage of his stardom but who REALLY knows to what extent, the rumor mill is just that...the rumor mill. If you're going to be so quick to believe everything you read in the dirt sheets about wrestling stars you're probably open to believe anything and everything you'd see on the cover of a National Enquirer. Yes, I'm sure that there are some incidents that happen and are true but they are then taken and blown greatly out of proportion. Professional Wrestling like any other entertainment art form is no different.
1. Lesnar never pinned Hogan. Coincidence?
No, he didn't....
2. He never made Hogan submit. Coincidence?
No but he rendered Hogan unconscious and Hogan's super heroics were rendered moot in the match, I say that was a pretty sound beating the Hulkster got. Go and pick up Lensar's book and you'll even read it in the man's own words..."Hulkster put me over big."
3. Lesnar was already champ before and already the man. See a pattern?
Uh...nope. Sorry boss but you are WRONG yet again.
Brock Lesnar wrestled The Hulkster on the August 8, 2002 edition of SmackDown.
Obsessed With Wrestling - WWE SmackDown - August 8, 2002 Results
YouTube Clip of Brock Vs Hogan - SmackDown -August 8, 2002
Since I don't have anything regarding this match from WWE's greatest matches I have checked a couple of sources to confirm that Lesnar vs Hogan predated SummerSlam 2002. Lesnar had won his first title at that event.
Brock Lesnar's First WWE Title reign info from WWE.com
That debunks everything you've just said about Lesnar's beating Hogan and again I do feel that Lesnar's victory over Hogan while not absolutely necessary definitely didn't hurt his character. It only helped to enhance his dominance.
4. Hogan was under contract and on his very last legs. Vince wanted him retired from active in-ring performing and eventually let him go. Hogan then stated he wouldn't mine one more run, preferrably where he didn't end up "on his back all the time". His words.
But Vince kept bringing him back anyway and sure didn't seem to mind doing things the way they got done, after all this wasn't WCW anymore, this was Vince's backyard Hogan was back in. Let me expand more on this in the next point you mentioned.
6. Hogan then went on from that non-defeat to pin Shawn Michaels and the future young superstar Randy Orton for some reason.
So a bloody and beaten unconscious Hulk Hogan is considered non-beaten by Brock Lesnar according to your view. If you can convince me that I misread that then I'll owe you a coke, good sir.
For one thing Shawn was an established star, it was a battle of two superstar legends and obviously Shawn was the one to lose to Hogan. Again Vince chose to let this slide, Vince probably saw a better conclusion in having Hogan go over Michaels and alas it happened.
As far as Orton goes, well there are rumblings behind the scenes that Orton's conduct was unbecoming of a professional. He was supposedly busted for drug use and what not and I HEARD that this has something to do with him losing to Hogan. Again since you are so adamant to rely on dirt sheet news...maybe just maybe that was the case with Orton too. I mean I think I remember WWE mentioning something about him being suspended too. I got a feeling that probably didn't help Orton's case.
Chicago Sun Times Orton Suspension Excerpt from High Beam
So take it as you will, I've got no real clue if this was really the case with why Hogan went over Orton but it would definitely make a lot of sense if the circumstances behind Orton's suspension are as true as has been said.
In conclusion I am going to definitely agree with accusations regarding my fandom for Hogan but so be it. I'm not saying that I don't accept criticisms of the man himself because I know he has rubbed fans the wrong way from time to time. But basing such animus on what you read and hear about behind the scenes is just ignorance. Especially with the sensationalistic nature of Professional Wrestling and most other forms of entertainment, truth and fiction are very hard to distinguish especially in the case of something like pro wrestling and all its associated rumors.