Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So simply because Cutler had one good game we're supposed to ignore the fact that he's a total diva?
Aaron Rodgers has shoved cameramen away from him and Tom Brady is religiously known for fighting with his coaches. Yet we seem to be role models to ESPN. I'm not saying Cutler is on the same level as Brady or Rodgers, but no one seems to give him credit where credit is due.
Rodgers and Brady are also a million times better than Cutler. I don't think they should get a pass simply because they are better, but it certainly eliminates any question of if their behavior will effect their role on the team.
I always thought Pikachu was a smug asshole.
275 yds and 2 tds (and a fumble lost) isn't amazing. He was good, but not amazing.
When you're a fan of a team that has had Rex Grossmen, Kyle Orton, and Jim Miller Cutler's game is the best we've seen at Quarterback. It's not like we have had a Brett Farve or a Rodgers.![]()
Jiggles, you watch Breaking Bad, right?
Sure do. Did you just start?
Skyler is perhaps the biggest cunt in T.V history, one of the greatest characters to hate on T.V.
Skyler's a bitch, but she's not THE worst. She's annoying, but it's justified. She's only trying to protect her family, while refusing to throw her meth dealer husband under the bus and getting berated by her son. She's a bitch because of her circumstances, but I still don't like her.
So I'm going to buy some vidya games today... but I don't know what to get. Right now I'm thinking Saints Row 3 and Madden 13, but I might replace SR3 with an FPS/First person adventure game, but right now I have no ideas. Any suggestions?
Skyler is easy to hate when you watch the show from the perspective of Walt, but if the show was portrayed through the perspective of anyone else Skyler would look like the biggest victim. She's acting bitchy because she has to to protect her family.
Absolutely, which is something it appears the Catalyst never counted on. I think one of the biggest messages of the game is that you can't stereotype anyone. There are Salarians who will consider emotions, Krogans that will push for peace, Geth that want to build bridges with Quarians, and humans that will sacrifice themselves to save the galaxy.
Have you played Leviathan yet? It pretty much reveals the origins of the Reapers 100%, and it's a pretty satisfying backstory. The missions for it kind of suck, but the story is a good one and you get a powerful new power that you can give to Shepard.
Damn, I've never been able to convince either guy to stand down. It must have something to do with the conversation choices because in my second play through I always had full paragon points.
What was your first saddest moment? Joker having to pull the Normandy away and abandoning Shepard? Something with the little boy?
Oh lord, the sniper rifle was a godsend in my second play through, it made everything SO much easier. As far as I could tell it was really the only weapon worth using besides the assault rifle in ME2 as the shotgun was severely nerfed.
Don't forget the Guardians. The sniper rifle allows you the opportunity to shoot through the little slot in their shields, but it's a tough shot. I had Liara rocking biotics on that mission, but those guardians would come out of nowhere and we were usually separated, or sometimes she was dead. I also had James on that mission, and his heavy offense really wasn't much use against their shields.
So I hear. From what I understand they were rushed by EA or something to get the game out by the release date. At least they corrected their mistake.
Picking destroy in my first play through was REALLY hard because I had sacrificed the Quarians for the Geth on Rannoch (I didn't have the option to save both), and I felt like destroying the Geth would have made the Quarian sacrifice all for naught. I also felt bad killing off EDI after encouraging Joker to fall for her. But it was the right decision for the galaxy. Species will always come and go, and it wasn't Shepard's fault that a few of them were wiped out during the Reaper Invasion. At least, it wasn't entirely his fault.
I don't think there was a character for the embodiment of Synthesis, but it was similar to what Saren wanted.
I suppose the fact that the catalyst is pushing so hard for Synthesis to be chosen should give away that it is the wrong choice, but he does sell it pretty well. Eternal peace, total cooperation between races, the final stop on the evolutionary train... pretty solid stuff, right?
I think Javiik's belief that evolution is the greatest force in the galaxy is telling about the Reaper's Plan's fatal flaw. They want to stop evolution every 50,000 years, and once Shepard has proven that they won't always win they want to put the kibosh on evolution altogether.
It's very tempting to make Shepard into a well meaning dictator of the most powerful race in the galaxy... but that just sounds like the beginning to a tragic story of a man that comes into power only to fall into darkness.
It's actually even more non-interference than Destroy is, which kind of fits my philosophy for the game a little better. However, I just can't get past the fact that all my friends are going to die and it's all my fault.
Are you sure that this is the last Mass Effect? The little note BioWare leaves for you at the end of the game implies they might make another game that takes place in the Mass Effect universe.