Difference is that taker still has it. Mark i should say. Shawn Hickenbottom is over the hill and was overrated his whole career in my opinion to begin with. I always thought marty janetty was the talent and true wrostler in the rockers after all... That being said, what is good ol hbgay's wrestlemania record? This punk has the nerve to call himself mr. wrestlmeania and his record is something like 1-6 all-time including a host of embarrassing losses. Mark (Taker) on the other hand is unmdefeated and will remain undefeated after he turns batista heel and takes that belt that never belonged around the fake warrior's waste to begin with. I wish cena and hbgay would both lose and get fired, the title belt belongs in the trash it has been disgraced as long as it has by johnny-no-talent.... ... One guy is over the hill and was never that great to begin with (HBGay) the other is quite possibly the worst "wrestler" posing as a "champion" known to wrestling in the last few decades... Lemme see here, I hate them both, so I don't care who wins... I would rather see Kenny Dykstra,Shelton Benjamin,Carlito,Johnny Nitro, or Melina, Victoria, or Mickey James as the champ over cena or hbgay...
Whoa, buddy, I didn't realize that you and the Undertaker were on a first name basis with eachother. Either that or you fancy yourself a bit of a smarkass. Either way, you're entitled to your own opinion, even if it's wrong. See Shawn Micheals is 5 and 8 at wrestlemania, he calls himself Mr. WrestleMania not because he has the best win/loss record, but because he seems to almost always have the match of the night. Case in point - see Manias 9, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20, and 21. All match of the night and 4 of them were match of the year worthy. Like him or not, over the hill or not, Shawn Michaels IS Mr. WreslteMania, as far as pure match quality goes. Now I have nothing against the Undertaker, he is awesome and honestly I think he's at his best in the ring right now at 45 years old (3 years older than the Over the hill Shawn Micheals I might add). I really do hope Undertaker .vs. Batista goes on last as he did win the Royal Rumble and it certainly means more sentamentaly then Cena .vs. Micheals.
As far as Cena goes, everyone seems to be anti-Cena, which I get, but the dude works his ass off night in a night out. No he's not the most technically gifted wrestler, but neither is Batista, and I don't see many people ragging on Batista in this thread. Bottem line is, Micheals always has amzing matches at Mania, and Cena works as hard out there as anybody to have entertaining matches. They wont have a 5 star classic, this wont be Savage/Steamboat, but it wont be Taker/Gonzolaz either. It will be Cenas best Mania match, and with the exception of the ladder match, it will probably be match of the night. I do see Cena winning this match, with HBK going over in a rematch at Backlash. Undertaker/Batista will not be as good bell to bell, but it means more and should be the Main Event. Closing the show with The Undertaker winning his 5th Championship and reamaining undefeated would be a wrestlemania moment worthy of ending the show on. Where in my opinion the last 2 WrestleManias did not close with that feeling.
But thats just my opinion....hence the right one!
