Forums Posters Awards: BEST STAFF MEMBER | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Forums Posters Awards: BEST STAFF MEMBER

Best Staff Member?

  • Dagger Dias

  • hatehabsforever

  • It's Damn Real!

  • Jack-Hammer

  • Killjoy

  • klunderbunker

  • Rainbow Yaz

  • Slyfox696

  • The Shape


Results are only viewable after voting.
Dagger was ousted earlier than expected in the best poster tourney, however I think he will win this, and rightfully so.
 
Well I know who I'm NOT voting for. I'll check my pms to find out if there are others I won't vote for.
 
And you debate? Haha. Funny.
Damn straight I do. I debate by providing facts and indisputable numbers that support my theory and/or topic of discussion. Not everyone agrees with me but no one (other than a sheer idiot) can deny that I am thorough in my research and provide evidence that help prove my arguments.
 
Damn straight I do. I debate by providing facts and indisputable numbers that support my theory and/or topic of discussion. Not everyone agrees with me but no one (other than a sheer idiot) can deny that I am thorough in my research and provide evidence that help prove my arguments.
Yeah. Sure you do. That's why all your threads are in the trash with Hulk Hogan written in all caps at some point.
 
Yeah. Sure you do. That's why all your threads are in the trash with Hulk Hogan written in all caps at some point.
Only the ones in the forums that you moderate. You even closed a thread I created about TNA's upcoming first PPV after moving to their new network.
 
Only the ones in the forums that you moderate. You even closed a thread I created about TNA's upcoming first PPV after moving to their new network.
Because it was talking about HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN. And nothing else.
 
Because it was talking about HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN. And nothing else.
It was about how TNA was featuring (footage of) him in thier next PPV showing that despite what haters claim, TNA does not feel that he was bad for the company or it's image.
489520_lg_thumb.jpg


Maybe if you'd read or even - God forbid - actually get involved in the discussion instead of just bitching you would learn something.
 
It wss about how TNA was featuring (footage of) him in thier next PPV
showing that despite what haters claim, TNA does not feel that he was bad for the company or it's image.
489520_lg_thumb.jpg


Maybe if you'd read or even - God forbid - actually get involved in the discussion instead of just bitching you would learn something.

I did.

As part of TNA's reboot for it's debut on the new network, they are rumored to be further stepping up productions, pyro and so forth. They are also expected to be going back to a 4 sided ring. Now they are featuring PPVs with legends. What do you know? After listening to the IWC who claimed that HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN was ruining the company, and briefly going back to the old ways, TNA now seems to be admitting that HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN was right after all. They are even featuring (footage of) him on their first PPV at their new network.

Maybe it's time to take another look at the HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN era and see it for the good points. Even if it was not your favorite era, you can't deny that a lot of good came from it. While maybe not as much as people hoped, viewership did increase. HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN'S debut episode remains the highest rated episode. 2011 - the "Immortal" takeover angle- is the highest yearly ratings average. The highest domestic attendance record was broken two years in a row. First in 2012 Slammiversary X drew 5,500 fans. Then the following year 7,200 fans came to Lockdown.


That's a landmark attendance growth every year - which has not been duplicated. Clearly they were doing something right. I know there were mistakes as well such as moving to Monday nights. But don't forget, their highest rating ever (HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN'S debut) was live on Monday Night so, it made sense to try it. Fans had different opinions on things like Open Fight Night, Gut Check Challenge and the Bound for Glory series (all of which I thought were good concepts but needed to be tweeked) but you have to at least give them props for trying something new.

So what do you think? If the rumored changes are true (not to mention the PPV), do you take that as a sign that the HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN years weren't as bad as some have said?
AND IN NO POINT OF THIS POST DID YOU DISCUSS THE FUCKING PPV IN QUESTION. WHICH YOU BROUGHT UP.

The first reply:

I HOPE you are kidding?


There were no positives from Hogan's tenure in TNA. None whatsoever. TNA in 2013 was in financial ruin due to the being on the road touring for Impact Wrestling...which was a Hulk Hogan idea.

Hogan never pushed the young guys, despite always claiming that Matt Morgan was the future.
Booked himself in the biggest show of the year versus Sting in a HORRID match.
Hired his friends and family to TNA.

Plus, he was never called Hollywood Hulk Hogan in TNA.:wtf:
But I'm supposed to keep the thread there because it's about an upcoming PPV. And totally not bragging about HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN instead. Right? No. It's spam and you're a moron.
 
I did.

AND IN NO POINT OF THIS POST DID YOU DISCUSS THE FUCKING PPV IN QUESTION. WHICH YOU BROUGHT UP.
Already getting pissed are we??? LMAO! I told you, you can't debate. Um, did you even read your own quote? After I set up the discussion by explaining the topic I asked:
So what do you think? If the rumored changes are true (not to mention the PPV), do you take that as a sign that the HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN years weren't as bad as some have said?
I set up the debate, asked a legitimate question and awaited responces.

The first reply:

But I'm supposed to keep the thread there because it's about an upcoming PPV. And totally not bragging about HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN instead. Right? No. It's spam and you're a moron.
Name calling? I broke you down boy. lol So because the first post dissagreed that was reason enough to shut it down? You're not fooling anyone. You know that I'm coming for your spot as mod and try to deleat my posts because you are scared
 
Already getting pissed are we??? LMAO! I told you, you can't debate. Um, did you even read your own quote? After I set up the discussion by explaining the topic I asked:

Talking about shit Hogan did and didn't did not refer to the PPV.
I set up the debate, asked a legitimate question and awaited responces.
1) It was quickly devolved into bullshit about Hulk Hogan.

2) "Responses".


Name calling? I broke you down boy. lol So because the first post dissagreed that was reason enough to shut it down? You're not fooling anyone. You know that I'm coming for your spot as mod and try to deleat my posts because you are scared

I'll start to worry when you learn English, boy.
 
Talking about shit Hogan did and didn't did not refer to the PPV.

1) It was quickly devolved into bullshit about Hulk Hogan.
The PPV hasn't happened yet. Again you are not reading. As has already been mentioned by me (and quoted by you) It was about if using footage of HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN in addition to the rumors that they are possibly going back to a four sided ring for their reboot when TNA debuts on Destination America is a sign that the HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN years were not the failure that uneducated haters claim.

2) "Responses".
Trying to change the subject because you are getting out debated? lol Hey, it's late and I'm doing this from my phone. I'm entitled to a typo or two.




I'll start to worry when you learn English, boy.[/QUOTE]
 
The PPV hasn't happened yet. Again you are not reading. As has already been mentioned by me (and quoted by you) It was about if using footage of HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN in addition to the rumors that they are possibly going back to a four sided ring for their reboot when TNA debuts on Destination America is a sign that the HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN years were not the failure that uneducated haters claim.

Trying to change the subject because you are getting out debated? lol Hey, it's late and I'm doing this from my phone. I'm entitled to a typo or two.




I'll start to worry when you learn English, boy.
[/quote]
You can't even work the damn script and you're "out-debating" me? On what particular subject? Your shitty threads being shitty?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top