I know. Taker can lose a normal match. Is there that much of a difference? Taker would be absolutely gassed by the end. Sting can't beat Taker in WCW? I call bullshit.
For the love of God, vote Brock Lesnar!
- Thread starter Uncle Sam
- Start date
I know. Taker can lose a normal match. Is there that much of a difference? Taker would be absolutely gassed by the end. Sting can't beat Taker in WCW? I call bullshit.
Hyorinmaru
Sit Upon The Frozen Heavens
****ing out rep in the welcome thread
Hyorinmaru
Sit Upon The Frozen Heavens
they're supposed to be in their prime which would make the fact that he hasn't had a good match in 15 years pointless
So, you're accusing me of making alts to vote for Lesnar while I was taking my health and Bible finals?
Oooo-kay then.
Cena's Little Helper
Mid-Card Championship Winner
Please don't tell me we have a Richard J. Daley on these boards.
Speaking of which, I'm sure the Bible would look down on this crap... somewhere in there.
So, you're accusing me of making alts to vote for Lesnar while I was taking my health and Bible finals?
Oooo-kay then.
Oh yes, Commandent #11..
Thou shalt not make alternate accounts on Wrestlezone.
I really didn't make any alts though.
Really? I thought it was somewhere in Leviticus. Silly me.
I thought that you of all people would side with me against CoCo..
Besides, I don't have a roommate.
Sting has had plenty of good matches in TNA.
And also, his match against Goldberg the night the Horsemen reunited on Nitro was a truly fantastic match; one of the VERY few good matches Goldberg has ever had. Not even God's gift to wrestling, one of the greatest heels in wrestling history, Triple H, was able to have a good match against Goldberg.
And also, his match against Goldberg the night the Horsemen reunited on Nitro was a truly fantastic match; one of the VERY few good matches Goldberg has ever had. Not even God's gift to wrestling, one of the greatest heels in wrestling history, Triple H, was able to have a good match against Goldberg.
Get out. Now.
Dude, you just don't like Sting, so of course you're not going to like anything he does, even when it really is good shit. A lot of his matches against Angle, Jarrett, Samoa Joe, and even Abyss were good matches. And most agree, especially the people in attendance, at the shows, who went nuts for them. And his promos in TNA have been good as well. At 50, the guy is still able to perform at that high of a level. Let's see where 'Taker is at at 50.
Sting should've won that match, end of story. And since he didn't, 'Taker's going to win the whole thing.
I thought that you of all people would side with me against CoCo..
Besides, I don't have a roommate.
Edge is Canadian.
SavageTaker
Everybody Has A Price!
Edge Won!
Cena's Little Helper
Mid-Card Championship Winner
I hope you're being sarcastic here, with the part about HHH being more than an average to above average wrestler who had three great years.
Sorry Jmt, but I'm not buyin what you're selling. I've seen a bunch of Sting's matches in TNA, and I've yet to see one that was better then average to possibly above average at best. But the large majority of his matches in TNA, and for that matter in the last 3 or 4 years of WCW, have been trash followed by trash followed by toppings of more trash. Does he even wrestle non-gimmick matches anymore?
Don't get me wrong, he was a great wrestler for a good six or so year period there, but I still wouldn't put him in the same league as the Undertaker. The Undertaker has been in more quality matches this year then Sting has in the last decade.
Don't get me wrong, he was a great wrestler for a good six or so year period there, but I still wouldn't put him in the same league as the Undertaker. The Undertaker has been in more quality matches this year then Sting has in the last decade.
Some of those arguments for Taker against Sting were awful. "He's bigger and stronger". When it comes to who's stronger, I'd rate them just about even, as Sting has shown plenty of times that he can physically dominate much larger opponents. And the "he sits up" argument was even worse. The funny thing is, Taker lost a hell of a lot more matches throughout the 90's, which I guess some consider his "deadman" prime than Sting did.
Then you have the fact that it took place in WCW, Sting's back yard, the fact Sting has MUCH more experience in longer matches, often facing multiple opponents in one night in Iron Man, European Cup tournaments among others.
As for his stuff in TNA, I must say it's pretty average, whereas he's managed to have a few pretty good matches. 1999 for Sting in WCW was quite good actually. The matches with Goldberg and DDP were two of my favourites from that year, in any company.
Then you have the fact that it took place in WCW, Sting's back yard, the fact Sting has MUCH more experience in longer matches, often facing multiple opponents in one night in Iron Man, European Cup tournaments among others.
As for his stuff in TNA, I must say it's pretty average, whereas he's managed to have a few pretty good matches. 1999 for Sting in WCW was quite good actually. The matches with Goldberg and DDP were two of my favourites from that year, in any company.
SavageTaker
Everybody Has A Price!
Who will you be supporting now Shocky?
