Well then the comparison you made about pointless flaming and any rebuttal being futile was complete bullshit. Didn't stop you from making it though apparently. Next time you make a comparison...fucking stick by it. Okay so I guess despite pretty much everyone agreeing that you were, at least in that particular instance being pretentious. you weren't. If that makes you feel better then sure kid. And which part was incorrect? Our belief that you were being snobby or that it was wrong to tell you so? Either way you're being delusional and living in your own head.
To the underlined portion: Yes. As I recall, the argument was about whether or not you can judge a persons intelligence by what they say, or something along those lines. Your position there was incorrect, that's what I'm referring to. Whether or not you view me as snobby is your business - I think you're wrong, but upon introspection, I could care less.
Haha every fucking thing you say gets douchier and fucking douchier. See the difference between you and I is this: if people were to, almost unanimously, tell me that I was being a cunt or pretentious I probably would have taken their word for it. Since ya know, I come here to discuss things with people whose opinions I repsect and are interested in. So I would respect what they were telling me and I have in the past been told I was being a dick and apologized. You however will go out of your way to convince yourself it was everyone else, not yourself. Maybe you've just returned with the hope that we all outgrew our idiotic ways.
I haven't taken a look at that thread in a while, but I would be comfortable saying that the people who were against me in that thread are people whose opinions I don't value. For example, if all the douchebags on a website thought I was an asshole, that wouldn't bother me - it's kind of the same concept. There may have been one or two people whose opinions I do respect that were against me in that thread, but I'll chalk that up to an anomaly.
Ulterior motives hmmm? Because really it looked like you came in here to bitch about who was winning with the clearly underlying feeling that you thought people who voted against your pick were idiots for doing so and needed to substantiate their opinion for your approval. How is that NOT douchy and snobby? By bringing some attention to the thread you mean you hoped to bitch enough to get people to go check it out and agree with you. You weren't saying ''Man this is a close one, you guys should check it out it's a really interesting battle here''.
An interpretation that is ultimately incorrect. I've told you why I made the thread and I'm going to leave it at that.
As you can probably tell, I'm not interested in arguing with you. I enjoy arguing with people I disagree with, like the recent thread with TDigle for example, but in this case I'm not arguing anything of substance with you. You think I'm a douchebag and that you're right, whereas I think you're an idiot and that you're wrong. I'm comfortable not being liked by you, and I'm
very comfortable in ignoring you until you'd like to debate something of substance, like something from the cigar lounge for example. Arguing with you whether or not I
really made the thread with the intention that I stated earlier isn't going to go anywhere, you're not going to change your mind, and since I know why I made the thread (seeing as how, I made it with an intention in mind), I'll know that you wrong and we'll keep arguing - it's a perpetual cycle of having to deal with bullshit. That may be your idea of time well-spent, but not mine.
