Xemmy
of the Le'beau family
More often than not I here from family members that the original is always better. For the most part, I find this statement true. For one, the original came up with the beat, the lyrics, and the message the song may convey.
For example, While Disturbed's version of Land of Confusion was kickass, Genesis' original is often considered better. I happen to be on that train.
The question is, what cover songs do you consider absolutely better than their predecessors? And explain why.
I have two sets to share.
1st- Running Up That Hill by Kate Bush, Covered by Placebo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snb5729vZe0 - Kate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdK9OlOzayE - Placebo
I have an issue with Kate Bush's version. While creative, it sounds almost cheery and bouncy next to the lyrics of the song. Placebo's on the other hand, slows the song down and adds space. This makes the song much more sorrowful, and in my opinion completes it to match the lyrics.
2nd- Working Class Hero by John Lennon, Covered by Greenday (And several others.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njG7p6CSbCU - John
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPPgeDhGzKY - Greenday
I'm so sorry John. ;_;
John Lennon is a lyrical genius, and this song proves it. But I can't stand his voice in Working Class Hero, and virtually every cover I've listened to just sounds better to me. He did everything right in his original version, but his voice isn't good enough for his own song. And I feel horrible saying that, like I deserve to be shot in the head or something, but Greenday in paticular takes his song to a whole new level, taking it out of it's acoustic comfort zone, into a rock song. It's great acoustic, but I picked Greenday's version because they did something most covers didn't do.
So, what about you?
For example, While Disturbed's version of Land of Confusion was kickass, Genesis' original is often considered better. I happen to be on that train.
The question is, what cover songs do you consider absolutely better than their predecessors? And explain why.
I have two sets to share.
1st- Running Up That Hill by Kate Bush, Covered by Placebo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snb5729vZe0 - Kate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdK9OlOzayE - Placebo
I have an issue with Kate Bush's version. While creative, it sounds almost cheery and bouncy next to the lyrics of the song. Placebo's on the other hand, slows the song down and adds space. This makes the song much more sorrowful, and in my opinion completes it to match the lyrics.
2nd- Working Class Hero by John Lennon, Covered by Greenday (And several others.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njG7p6CSbCU - John
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPPgeDhGzKY - Greenday
I'm so sorry John. ;_;
John Lennon is a lyrical genius, and this song proves it. But I can't stand his voice in Working Class Hero, and virtually every cover I've listened to just sounds better to me. He did everything right in his original version, but his voice isn't good enough for his own song. And I feel horrible saying that, like I deserve to be shot in the head or something, but Greenday in paticular takes his song to a whole new level, taking it out of it's acoustic comfort zone, into a rock song. It's great acoustic, but I picked Greenday's version because they did something most covers didn't do.
So, what about you?