Generally speaking, I have to agree. I've been a big fan of Punk's work and him walking out of WWE hasn't changed that I believe he's extremely talented. I don't think there's a "right or wrong" side to this whole situation. For one thing, I agree that CM Punk is not the "Voice of the Voiceless" and never have. Sure, it made for a good catchphrase and for an interesting character but when it's all said & done, it's just character hype. Like any other wrestler that's ever been a success and made a lot of money, Punk ultimately wants the best he can get for himself. I don't think there's a thing wrong with that, but I do believe a lot of internet fans have bought into the hype of Punk being some sort of shining knight that's out to save professional wrestling from evil corporations and jerk off executives. If Punk was unhappy, wanted time off and wasn't happy with his spot in the company; then I can't say he was wrong to leave. I don't agree with the way he did it, as I do think it was disrespectful to the fans who showed up at Raw to see him do his thing.
On the other hand, as tempting as it is for internet fans especially, WWE management isn't made up of a bunch of sadists who get their rocks off by screwing over their talent while simultaneously flipping the bird to fans. I know that it's awfully fashionable to always blame big corporations for every single little thing that's wrong with the world, which has some truth to it, but in the case of WWE, it's a convenient crutch for pissed off internet fans to lean on whenever something goes down concerning a wrestler that they're especially fond of. In this case, what it boils down to in the minds of a lot of net fans is simply this: WWE fucked over CM Punk and Punk got tired of it. That's all well & good but, as with most things in life, probably not entirely accurate. IF Punk being unhappy with his current spot, his match against Triple H & not being in THE top match at WrestleMania are why he walked out, then it's not necessarily being fucked over. Bret Hart got fucked over back in Montreal at Survivor Series '97, whether justified or not is debated tot his day. Again, IF all this is part of why Punk walked out, then him not getting his way in exactly the way he wanted it doesn't strike me as being fucked over.
I don't know why Punk walked out and neither does any other fan or any of the dirtsheet writers. Neither Punk or WWE have given their side of the story. If it's because Punk's just unhappy about his spot at this time then, based simply on what I've heard & read over the years, that's nothing new to him. IF those reports are accurate, then Punk's always pissed off or frustrated about something. IF he feels he hasn't gotten his due in WWE, then MAYBE it's because of that attitude. Again, I'm just saying IF this info that's been put out over the years is accurate, then Punk hasn't exactly come off like someone that's loyal to the company. If management feels that Punk isn't willing to bust his ass for the John Cena spot and if Punk's actions & attitude haven't given any indication otherwise, then they're not gonna give him the Cena spot.
As far as the crowd this Monday goes, the best shot WWE has of keeping them from really being too hostile is to load the card. They'll be CM Punk chants regardless, but WWE's done a very good job of ultimately keeping things on course since his departure. The chants that have started up on Raw & SD! haven't lasted very long. When it's all said & done, all WWE can do is try to put on the best show they can and for the wrestlers to be as professional as they can. If the Chicago crowd is hell bent on acting out, there's not much WWE can do about it; but it'll also mean that Raw or a ppv might not pass through Chicago again for a while.