You're in no place to correct common metaphors, but since you think it matters, I'll fill you in on something: The correct way to say it is "Champing at the bit". It's a common mistake and appears that both of us are incorrect.
This, however, isn't a point for you by any means. You nitpicked and had a chance to truly correct me and you blew it.
I didn't misuse it. Anyone that's not you knows what modus operandi means. Since you don't, I'll give you the definition:
Since you're a Prisoner, that works even more. Your modus operandi is to repeatedly say you're right without showing any sources stating you are.
I'd love to hear your dictionary's definition, though.
That you bitch excessively about this place but won't leave. Pretty valid point.
I think everyone is in agreement here that you don't know how the fuck a straw works, if you'd click on that Spoiler right there.
1. That green money you say I can get a paper cut from is made out of cloth, not paper. So you can't even get that right.
2.That's not what being professional means when discussing things online. Anyone with common sense knows what a professional response is. But since you don't, I'll explain: any response that has both A. merit (that means worth, lil bitch) and B. informative backing. Your arguments have neither.
How again is it implied? Is this argument based on assumption? Terrible terrible argument.
If you were to take the time to look at the quotes I've given, you'll notice that a good share of those sites were MerriamWebsterDictionary.com.
But hey, let's pretend for one minute everything came from Wikipedia. How does that make your argument any more right?
Can you even prove those wiki answers wrong?