An analysis on why nobody read Rayne's analysis of the election

[JGlass]

It was too long.
Nobody cares what he has to say.
Nobody cares to analyze the election.
Rayne is a tremendously dull poster.
I already analyzed the election: Dagger won because he worked the hardest. Coco and Crock lost because they didn't. The end.

 

[Big Nick Dudley]

Smart guy.

I didn't read it, though.

 

[Tiger Chaos Theory]

Agreed on all points.

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

Why is your name not bold JGlass?

 

[JGlass]

Why is your name not bold JGlass?

I started using the board room to host orgies and cocaine parties. It was a grand time, but Sly and KB got mad and fired me.

 

[ABMorales787]

What the fuck? When did you step down? You asshole!

 

[justinsayne]

Why is your name not bold JGlass?

Because he's not a mod anymore, why the fuck else would it not be in bold?

 

[It's Damn Real!]

Rayne is an incredibly dull poster? Hardly. Just because your attention span doesn't allow you to read longer posts does not mean the author is dull. That issue is on you, not him.

I find Rayne to be one of the more refreshing voices here because unlike the majority of the parrots that frequent this site that just regurgitate the same sentiments as their colorless peers, Rayne actually brings a sense of logic and reason some of you could only dream to reach.

I haven't read his analysis on this election, because I hardly give a fuck about real world politics, let alone forum ones, but I wholeheartedly disagree with the idea that anything about him is "dull".

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

I started using the board room to host orgies and cocaine parties. It was a grand time, but Sly and KB got mad and fired me.

Typical Nazi admins. Stoping an orgy just coz they came early.

 

[ABMorales787]

Rayne is an incredibly dull poster? Hardly. Just because your attention span doesn't allow you to read longer posts does not mean the author is dull. That issue is on you, not him.

I find Rayne to be one of the more refreshing voices here because unlike the majority of the parrots that frequent this site that just regurgitate the same sentiments as their colorless peers, Rayne actually brings a sense of logic and reason some of you could only dream to reach.

I haven't read his analysis on this election, because I hardly give a fuck about real world politics, let alone forum ones, but I wholeheartedly disagree with the idea that anything about him is "dull".

I did read it. I still thought it was inaccurate.

 

[justinsayne]

Rayne is an incredibly dull poster? Hardly. Just because your attention span doesn't allow you to read longer posts does not mean the author is dull. That issue is on you, not him.

I find Rayne to be one of the more refreshing voices here because unlike the majority of the parrots that frequent this site that just regurgitate the same sentiments as their colorless peers, Rayne actually brings a sense of logic and reason some of you could only dream to reach.

I haven't read his analysis on this election, because I hardly give a fuck about real world politics, let alone forum ones, but I wholeheartedly disagree with the idea that anything about him is "dull".

 

[JGlass]

Rayne is an incredibly dull poster? Hardly. Just because your attention span doesn't allow you to read longer posts does not mean the author is dull. That issue is on you, not him.

I find Rayne to be one of the more refreshing voices here because unlike the majority of the parrots that frequent this site that just regurgitate the same sentiments as their colorless peers, Rayne actually brings a sense of logic and reason some of you could only dream to reach.

I haven't read his analysis on this election, because I hardly give a fuck about real world politics, let alone forum ones, but I wholeheartedly disagree with the idea that anything about him is "dull".

I got through the first paragraph, then I lost my focus and stopped reading.

 

[Uncle Sam]

I've no problems with the guy, and I would have apologised for not reading his post thoroughly - overlong and uninteresting as I found it - but then he started hilariously puffing out his plumage like a peacock.

 

[It's Damn Real!]

I did read it. I still thought it was inaccurate.

Inaccurate ≠ dull.

I got through the first paragraph, then I lost my focus and stopped reading.

And that makes him dull? I just read his analysis, and while I still don't give a fuck (again, don't care about politics) about this election, I'd say there was more personality and identifying characteristics in just ONE of his sentences then there is in the majority of posts made on this forum by any of it's parrots and regurgitators.

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

Who are these regurgitating parrots you speak of?

Am I green in and out as well?

 

[justinsayne]

Inaccurate ≠ dull.



And that makes him dull? I just read his analysis, and while I still don't give a fuck (again, don't care about politics) about this election, I'd say there was more personality and identifying characteristics in just ONE of his sentences then there is in the majority of posts made on this forum by any of it's parrots and regurgitators.

 

[JGlass]

And that makes him dull? I just read his analysis, and while I still don't give a fuck (again, don't care about politics) about this election, I'd say there was more personality and identifying characteristics in just ONE of his sentences then there is in the majority of posts made on this forum by any of it's parrots and regurgitators.

I didn't mean his post, I meant your post. The one I quoted.

I took one look at his and said no thanks. I'm just basing this analysis on conjecture alone.

 

[Tiger Chaos Theory]

Inaccurate ≠ dull.



And that makes him dull? I just read his analysis, and while I still don't give a fuck (again, don't care about politics) about this election, I'd say there was more personality and identifying characteristics in just ONE of his sentences then there is in the majority of posts made on this forum by any of it's parrots and regurgitators.

Saying he's better than any WWE Shareholders parrots and regurgitators isn't exactly much to praise. His nonspam post are articulate and well thought out, I always read his stuff in the TNA section. Having said that, his post in the election forums have been self aggrandizing, his analysis of the election is actually just a long winded parroting of a post made in the Final Poll thread, and his snarky self-important attitude throughout has turned people like me and JGlass off, despite the fact that I still find most of his other post to be some of the best on this forum.

 

[D-Man]

Disagreeing with someone is not the same as them being "wrong."

 

[It's Damn Real!]

I didn't mean his post, I meant your post. The one I quoted.

I took one look at his and said no thanks. I'm just basing this analysis on conjecture alone.

Thank you for illustrating my point about your attention span, or lack there of, then.

Saying he's better than any WWE Shareholders parrots and regurgitators isn't exactly much to praise. His nonspam post are articulate and well thought out, I always read his stuff in the TNA section. Having said that, his post in the election forums have been self aggrandizing, his analysis of the election is actually just a long winded parroting of a post made in the Final Poll thread, and his snarky self-important attitude throughout has turned people like me and JGlass off, despite the fact that I still find most of his other post to be some of the best on this forum.

Actually, it is much to praise, because this place is over run with parrots and regurgitators, ergo guys like Rayne are in essence the "diamonds in the rough" of the forum, because they actually bring something others do not. Whether or not you like what they bring is irrelevant, subjective and entirely personal — it has no bearing on his actual talents. You not caring for his attitude, for exmaple, does not change the fact that he is simply better equipped to provide the forum with analyses that would be difficult to reproduce or replicate without him.

Who gives a shit about the opinions of a user who admits to not caring about the opinions of others', anyway? Talk about monotony...

Disagreeing with someone is not the same as them being "wrong."

Bingo.

 

[Tiger Chaos Theory]

Actually, it is much to praise, because this place is over run with parrots and regurgitators, ergo guys like Rayne are in essence the "diamonds in the rough" of the forum, because they actually bring something others do not. Whether or not you like what they bring is irrelevant, subjective and entirely personal — it has no bearing on his actual talents. You not caring for his attitude, for exmaple, does not change the fact that he is simply better equipped to provide the forum with analyses that would be difficult to reproduce or replicate without him.

Aside from his analysis on the election being previously stated by others of course.

 

[JGlass]

Thank you for illustrating my point about your attention span, or lack there of, then.

What were we talking about again?

 

[It's Damn Real!]

Aside from his analysis on the election being previously stated by others of course.

Well I'd have to see those other analyses to accurately compare the two, but until I've had a chance to do so personally, yes, I'd concede this point to you.

Either way, I'd much rather spend my time reading the often long-winded replies of Rayne than I would the far less interesting, far less purposeful musings of WrestleZone's parrot talkers looking to pad post counts as a means to make a name for themselves based off an irrelevant number.

 

[ABMorales787]

What were we talking about again?

Rayne though we were getting too personal with the election and then gave us a long-winded analysis as to why we were wrong.

 

[JGlass]

Rayne though we were getting too personal with the election and then gave us a long-winded analysis as to why we were wrong.

You TNA fans really don't get sarcasm, do you?

This forum has been making my brain sad lately.