A Very Regal Three Hour RAW: King Of The Ring LD - 11/29/10 | Page 45 | WrestleZone Forums

A Very Regal Three Hour RAW: King Of The Ring LD - 11/29/10

Heels need not be weak. There are monster heels too. Why can't you understand that appearing weak is not a bad thing for the Miz? JBL had that great run as a coward champion on Smackdown. Same thing could happen to the Miz.

Coward heel and weak champion are two totally different things.
 
actually, not every heel has to be weak. And Miz wasn't weak, he used everything at his disposal to beat a guy who is talented enough to be called a Hall of Famer.
I'm not talking about tonight. Everything Miz has ever done, and really any modern heel ever does, is one giant concession that they can't beat top babyfaces on an even field. Eventually, you stop caring because the good guy is always the better guy regardless of the outcome. I could give a fuck less.

There's a reason wrestling is regarded as entertainment for morons. That's because it is. There's nothing out there which challenges viewers less than professional wrestling. The fact that you people can spend hours upon hours being intellectually stimulated by it doesn't exactly speak highly. This entire discussion is an absolute joke.
 
I have better things to do with my time. Like scratch my balls or pick lint out of my belly button.
So you're a gutless coward then. Wow. That's pretty pathetic. You are gonna just sit on the sidelines while everyone else fights your battles for you. That's probably the most pathetic thing I've ever heard. Balls. Grow'em.

you said in the red rep "You're more annoying than Miz." Now I'd like you to explain that. I stated the fact that as of right now, The Miz is being booked as champion similarly to The Rock when he was in the Corporation, and had 7 or 8 lackeys (not to mention numerous lackeys to help him win the belt itself, including Vince McMahon ending the match early and awarding Rock the belt). I love The Rock, but if Miz is weak now, then Rock was weak then, no ifs, ands, or buts about it.
 
Cheat/interference its all the same thing (referring to Riley's involvement). If Cole was an active lackey then maybe I could see where people are coming from. He isn't. Think what you want but Coco's last post put it about as good as anyone is going to. Goodnight all.
 
So you're a gutless coward then. Wow. That's pretty pathetic. You are gonna just sit on the sidelines while everyone else fights your battles for you. That's probably the most pathetic thing I've ever heard. Balls. Grow'em.

you said in the red rep "You're more annoying than Miz." Now I'd like you to explain that. I stated the fact that as of right now, The Miz is being booked as champion similarly to The Rock when he was in the Corporation, and had 7 or 8 lackeys (not to mention numerous lackeys to help him win the belt itself, including Vince McMahon ending the match early and awarding Rock the belt). I love The Rock, but if Miz is weak now, then Rock was weak then, no ifs, ands, or buts about it.
1) Precedent doesn't mean something is good.

2) How weak The Rock was in late '98 and early '99 doesn't make you any less of an annoying twat.
 
Coward heel and weak champion are two totally different things.

My mistake then. Anyway, I think this is going nowhere. Clearly you are a Miz mark and I am a one of his haters so we just have to agree to disagree on whether the Miz looked weak in that match.
 
let's just fuck this argument off and wait for the coming weeks to see how Miz as Champion continues to develop.
 
I'm not talking about tonight. Everything Miz has ever done, and really any modern heel ever does, is one giant concession that they can't beat top babyfaces on an even field. Eventually, you stop caring because the good guy is always the better guy regardless of the outcome. I could give a fuck less.
1. If you could give a fuck less, why do you
A) Watch
B) participate in a live discussion with people who do care?
2. Did you notice that many heels won CLEANLY tonight? ADR made the recently unstoppable Daniel Bryan tap out. Sheamus destroyed Kofi Kingston clean. Sheamus defeated John Morrison clean. Saying that the good guy is always better regardless of the outcome shows that you have no clue what you're talking about.

There's a reason wrestling is regarded as entertainment for morons. That's because it is. There's nothing out there which challenges viewers less than professional wrestling. The fact that you people can spend hours upon hours being intellectually stimulated by it doesn't exactly speak highly. This entire discussion is an absolute joke.
Then why even bother joining in, and why bother giving people shit for it? if you don't like it, go to another thread and post there. There are THOUSANDS of threads here on Wrestlezone that you can post in without solely being there to be a spineless bitch.

I'm done here. The shit being spewed stinks too much to grab my boots and wade through it.

....and you still haven't presented a rationale arguement, you're just a douche.
Correction Marky. He is being a douche IN THIS DISCUSSION. Blue's a cool guy, he's just being a dick right now.
 
You asked me before to "try" you. I did, and you looked weaker than you think Miz did tonight, you look like someone who cant't make a valid point.
So the fact that a 61 year old man nearly beat the WWE champion and was only saved from defeat by the biggest pussy ever (Micheal Cole) doesn't scream weak to you says something.
 
My mistake then. Anyway, I think this is going nowhere. Clearly you are a Miz mark and I am a one of his haters so we just have to agree to disagree on whether the Miz looked weak in that match.

We can agree to disagree but for the record I'm not a Miz mark, at all, just wanted you to see my point.
 
So the fact that a 61 year old man nearly beat the WWE champion and was only saved from defeat by the biggest pussy ever (Micheal Cole) doesn't scream weak to you says something.

Come on dude, the old guy who makes coffee at 711 can push Miz off the top rope through a table, Miz wouln't get up and that old guy is the champ. Doesn't make Miz weak, it means he was the first one to fly through a table. i know you don't like Miz, i get it, i don't either but to say he looked weak tonight isn't accurate, he looked like a typical heel.
 
1. If you could give a fuck less, why do you
A) Watch
What makes you think I watch?

B) participate in a live discussion with people who do care?
For the massive erection it gives me. Clearly.

2. Did you notice that many heels won CLEANLY tonight? ADR made the recently unstoppable Daniel Bryan tap out. Sheamus destroyed Kofi Kingston clean. Sheamus defeated John Morrison clean. Saying that the good guy is always better regardless of the outcome shows that you have no clue what you're talking about.
Odd. I could have sworn I mentioned top babyfaces. In which case I'm right.

Then why even bother joining in, and why bother giving people shit for it? if you don't like it, go to another thread and post there. There are THOUSANDS of threads here on Wrestlezone that you can post in without solely being there to be a spineless bitch.
Thinking the way you blow Vince McMahon on a weekly basis is annoying somehow reflects poorly on me? I have a hard time buying that one. But keep trying to sell it.
 
The most logical thing for ALL of us marks and non marks of The Miz to do is to clearly wait to see him develop as the top champion, we can't judge him solely on his run on this one match as a champion in his first defense, its unfair.
 
The most logical thing for ALL of us marks and non marks of The Miz to do is to clearly wait to see him develop as the top champion, we can't judge him solely on his run on this one match as a champion in his first defense, its unfair.
He's going to be booked like every main event heel in the last five years. I don't need to wait for anything.
 
All i know is Miz has potential to be a good champion...whether people considered him weak or not in his match tonight.
 
For those who are fans of television which is intellectually challenging, it's broken. Of course you wouldn't know a damn thing about that. Mentally, you're part of the WWE's target demo.

You have a terrible attitude, clearly you fall right into that demo you think you know so much about.
 
What makes you think I watch?
The fact that you're on a wrestling forum live discussion of a wrestling event. If you aren't watching, then you're trolling. Isn't that infraction-able?

For the massive erection it gives me. Clearly.
We can tell it gets you hard. Why else would you be here? The only reason is that you like to be an annoying prick.

Odd. I could have sworn I mentioned top babyfaces. In which case I'm right.
you mentioned good guys always looking better then the bad guys. I proved you wrong with multiple examples from tonight where bad guys won cleanly over good guys. The only "unclean" finisher tonight was the Main Event, and you said every heel wins dirty. I proved YOU wrong, actually. Now shut the fuck up, and go away, since you're being worse then Shattered Dreams (which is nearly impossible).

Thinking the way you blow Vince McMahon on a weekly basis is annoying somehow reflects poorly on me? I have a hard time buying that one. But keep trying to sell it.
Actually I don't love everything WWE does. The past 3 weeks have been outstanding. 2 of the best RAWs in forever, and a very good one tonight. I don't see how you get me "blowing Vince McMahon on a weekly basis".

Besides, nothing is more annoying then people who troll LDs just to shit on others opinions. If anyone is annoying, it's you, not me.

He's going to be booked like every main event heel in the last five years. I don't need to wait for anything.
As Doug said, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. It obviously has worked for years, since WWE is still a profitable company, and they are pumping out more programming then ever, and still putting asses in seats.

Seriously, man, if you aren't watching a program, why the fuck are you in an LD of the program?
 
For those who are fans of television which is intellectually challenging, it's broken. Of course you wouldn't know a damn thing about that. Mentally, you're part of the WWE's target demo.
you yourself said that wrestling has never been intellectually stimulating. Now you want it to be? It's been successful for 100 years being NOT intellectually stimulating, why change now? Your interests changed, and you no longer like wresting. That's fine. Just get the fuck out of a WRESTLING discussing then.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top