You guys should just go one-on-one. I'm almost at the point where I don't want to ruin it by getting involved.
^^^
Even though D-Man wouldn't ruin it, just make it more fun.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You guys should just go one-on-one. I'm almost at the point where I don't want to ruin it by getting involved.
Choose it mofo. Let's get it on.
I'll defer it to you. After all, you're the one challenging me. You choose the subject and I'll choose the side.
Who wants to team with me?
TF I'm talking about the debator league rules. This challenge is being made under similar rules. We're not going to take challenges from teams who need to know the topic before deciding whether or not to participate. If you sign up, you sign up to debate anything wrestling related.
Then I am not interested in having you.
You're missing the point - you sign up first, THEN you learn the topic. And if you don't know a lot about it, you RESEARCH it. If you're not passionate about the topic, too bad, you debate it anyway.
You have too many guidelines, this isn't a contract negotiation.
Sidious, in the interest of just trying to be a mediator here without any kind of bias, IC25 is merely stating the rules that he and I had to obide by in the previous Debate Leagues. So, your requests, in a way, are irrelevant.
If you are unwilling to play the game by the established rules, then you backed down from the challenge.
I have ideas D-Man, but since I answered the call, I do feel that you should be entitled to the debating subject. I do feel I am better backed against the wall. Just look at my debate with Tenta.