Angle/Taker at No Way Out has to be pretty close, doesn't it?
Another I missed. I was just watching the history of the WHC DVD two nights ago, and I loved re-visiting this match. Angle going back to the ankle over and over regardless of the counter 'Taker used was brilliant.
Good point, something I haven't considered previously, to be honest. For me, it's a little harder to go 5-stars for a match with a commercial break, which this one had, because we miss part of the action.Given that bias and the fact that it's harder to logically fit a lot into a shorter match, I'd say it's easier to have a great long match than a great short match. But that doesn't mean short matches can't be great. In fact I'd say that having a great short match is a greater accomplishment than having a great long match.
True enough. I just felt the way they were moving out there along was incredibly fluid, along with the psychology employed, which made it phenomenal.Also, just for shits and giggles: You gave Angle vs Rey at SummerSlam 2002 the five snowflake stamp. That match clocked in at under ten minutes bell-to-bell.
Maybe I should just say I felt it was flat-out better then the HBK/Benjamin match.
