WWE Round 2 Match 2: The Hardy Boyz vs. the Bushwackers

Discussion in '2nd Tag Team Tournament (2008)' started by Shocky, Oct 6, 2008.

?

The Hardys vs. the Bushwackers

  1. The Hardy's

  2. The Bushherders

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Shocky

    Shocky Kissin Babies and Huggin Fat Girlz

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    6,198
    Likes Received:
    1,115
    All of these matches take place inside of a WWE Ring with WWE Rules.

    The Match will be open for a week.

    The Hardy Boys are Matt and Jeff Hardy from 1999-2002.

    The Bushwackers are Luke and Butch, you can also submit their sheepherder days in as well.
     
  2. klunderbunker

    klunderbunker Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    17,857
    Likes Received:
    3,358
    This is the Hardys. While the Bushwackers were great at the Sheepherders, the Hardys were one of WWE's babies. They were insanely over and were brothers, giving them a different kind of chemistry. They were never the most dominant, but this should be no problem for htme.
     
  3. My$terio_Fan

    My$terio_Fan I can do whatever I want

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,149
    Likes Received:
    370
    It has to be the Hardys. People will say what they want about them, but their is no disputing they were way over, entertaining, and put on some great matches(who cares if they were all gimmick). The purpose of wrestling is to entertain the fans(well make money but you get it)and the Hardys did that.
     
  4. CCS

    CCS Getting Noticed By Management

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    154
    I voted the Hardys. THey was insanely over and they continue to be over today. They was very innovative and probably could have revolutionized tag team wrestling. Even to this day people mark out bigtime when the Hardys music hits. They're legendary.
     
  5. IrishCanadian25

    IrishCanadian25 Going on 10 years with WrestleZone

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    6,092
    Likes Received:
    1,532
    Hardy's 100%. They may have been spot monkey-ish, but they were sound as a tandem in the ring. Luke and Butch, though fun, were glorified tag team jobbers (I mean, even the Beverley Brothers won the belts once!) who only got over because of their fun, wacky gimmicks and crowd-licking antics.
     
  6. Mighty NorCal

    Mighty NorCal SHALL WE BEGIN?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    2,456
    good lordy would this be a butt ugly match. And no not like a bikini models butt, like John Tenta. laborious to say the least.

    regardless, the Hardy's go over. call them spot monky hacks if you must, but they were an excellent team for years. I know people for whatever reason just LOVE to talk about "the sheepherders" it doesnt really matter. I dont even think television existed when the whackers' were the herders, let alone video tape. Wrestlemania moments >>>> undercard in random aussie feds.

    thats right. disrespec.
     
  7. texas freebird

    texas freebird the voices in my head say hello!!!!

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    4
    Before they became the bushwackers butch and luke were entertaining as the sheepherders. However when vince turned them into face lickers they became crap so it has to be the hardys !!!!!
     
  8. Y 2 Jake

    Y 2 Jake Slightly Autistic

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    Messages:
    6,886
    Likes Received:
    1,388
    After nearly 10 years as a tag team I still don't know what The Hardy's did as a team. Yes they had a couple of good matches involving Ladders. But when you're friends with a ladder it's hard to not have good matches.
     
  9. Shocky

    Shocky Kissin Babies and Huggin Fat Girlz

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    6,198
    Likes Received:
    1,115
    The Hardy's absolutely demolish the Bushwackers 23-1.

    My Thoughts:

    If you're not too sure, I'm not a fan of the Hardy's. Never have been, probably never will be. I think that the WWE rules in this match favor the Hardy's, yes I know the Bushwackers were a WWF team.

    In a situation that the Sheepherders went against the Hardy's in an ECW environment, I might change my vote. It speaks to the weakness of this decade that a team considered a top five team could lose to a bottom of the run team from the early 90's.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"