Rare for you to be wrong? Well let's see.
Wrong. Kidd is an independent contractor. Meaning he isn't covered by workers' comp. He also doesn't have a case under tort law. So WWE could fire him without fear of repercussion.
Wrong. You were saying that people like Natalya need to marry an employee to keep their job because they are ugly. It baffled you that a person you find ugly could keep their job based off merit. Natalya, a veteran presence and was the best woman in the ring for a long time. You said she must have her job due to Kidd and Neidhart because she's ugly and has no redeemable qualities. You said a sexist thing. You weren't being a knight in shining armor. You were being a pig.
Wrong 3 times. Once every paragraph. Perhaps you meant rarely right?
EDIT: But wait, there's more!
Because he wasn't overexposed yet. As part of the Shield, he was hidden in tag matches. NXT part is baffling since I'm willing to bet you've seen maybe one match from his time there.
Go back and watch Reigns vs Orton from whatever SummerSlam. That's when the problem started. Fans were into him. They liked him. Then he had a lackluster match. It all went downhill from there. Yes, his in-ring stuff has improved greatly but his mic work hasn't. WWE didn't push him right. He could be a killer. WWE made him talk about tater tots and beanstalks. They need to frame him better.
Prichard has said Vince hated Austin's accent and thought he had no mic skills. The combination of getting over and working hard with Vince led to him being pushed. You're not going to get a sustained pushed if no one reacts. Drew McIntyre's first push died due to lack of reaction.
The fans didn't turn on Punk. He was being cheered by nearly everyone. He turned so he could face Rock as a heel.
Firstly, Tyson Kidd is paralyzed because of a wrestling match, so Vince keeps him around so he won't sue.
What I said about Natayla is no different to other posters here saying that the Bellas "married" into the job, and only got to where they were because of looks and who they were involved with, and then they say that Nattie should be pushed instead.
I pointed out that Natalya was married to talent as well (which is true). Also, this was the time after the "Bra-&-Panties" era but before NXT and "The Diva's Revolution" where posters here bagged any good looking Diva as being eye-candy and nothing else. So they made the divide that Divas at that time could be good looking OR good wrestlers, but not both. So if you say these things about me, call out some of the other posters about their prejudice as well (but you won't, because you agree with them).
So, if a wrestler is overexposed, you don't like it. You don't like having one person being the "top guy". Firstly, then why have championships then? Why not just everyone on an equal footing?
You need to have someone who is the "main eventer", the top guy. Also, I bet if your fave, you would change your tune and want him to remain "the guy". So you are full of bullshit.
So Roman has a lacklustre match at "Summerslam" so you all turn on him. So no-one can have a bad match ever, in your opinion. They must produce a five-star classic all the time, or you turn on them. How many five star matches have you wrestled, champ?
The fact is, he could have the in-ring skills of Kurt Angle and the stickwork of the Rock, but you would still be down on him, because he isn't "your guy". You see, you and those like you think that the WWE should revolve around you. You are so arrogant and narcissistic that you believe that Vince should call you for advice how to run WWE, since you think you could do it better? Where did we get to in this world when the customer or the fan stopped being that and thought that they knew better, and went above their station.
If the Rock talked about teetertots and beanstalks, you would wet yourself laughing. I bet if "Stone Cold" said it, it would also get applause from these sheep. But because it isn't someone YOU want, then you refuse to accept him.
You don't want him framed better, you want Roman Reigns buried instead. You won't be happy until he is jobbing to everyone, and isn't on TV. Then you won't have him "shoved down your throats anymore". The only thing that I would love to see shoved down some of the haters throats is Roman's fist until the hater chokes and dies.
As for Punk, fans did write that they wanted someone new as champion, and that Punk has been champion for too long (this is the era where people want the title hot-potatoed, and then they complain about how no-one is made to look strong). Bruno Sammartino wouldn't have got his long title runs in today's WWE without people on here asking for someone new being champion, and it being too "predictable".
Fans never went cold on Punk (since he was still once an indy guy, and smarks like to pretend that they are superior by knowing the names of anyone in pool-hall wrestling companies), but they went lukewarm on him. Punk got his love back from the fans only after he cut that shoot promo, and left WWE and bagged Vince (who is hated by most here).
