when i review the matches i take to consideration four things:
moveset: the moves have logic, relevance, intensity
pace of the match: there is a good transition from move to another move
psicology: there is a story in the match
crowd work: the wrestlers make the people invest in the match
I have a scale
10: a piece of art
9: classic
8: excelent
7: very good
6: good
5: average
4: below average
3: bad
2: mediocre
1: auwful
i use the most objective format that i can. I do this because with this i can be more neutral. If it wasn't for this format i would value the matches for my favorites wrestlers higher than the other and i don't want that, i want to be objective.
My favorite wrestler is Triple H and when i didn't use this format i thougth that his matches were the best, but i was wrong. Even matches that i didn't enjoy like triple h matches sometimes get a higher score because there were better. I still love triple h matches but sometimes i have to admit that there wasn't that spectacular. Now i am staring to enjoy the work of all superstar even if i don't like their characters.
I invite you to do this and you will, like me, enjoy more the matches. Sometime i think that the match was awesome but when i review the match seriously i realized that it was an average match.
My rating for the Elimination Chamber 2013:
1. Alberto Del Rio vs Big Show: 5
2. Antonio Cesaro vs The Miz: 6.5
3. Elimination Chamber match: 9.5
4. The Shield vs Sheamus, Ryback & Cena: 5
5. Dolph Ziggler vs Kofi Kingston: 3
6. Tamina Snuka vs Kaitlyn: 1.5
7. The Rock vs Cm Punk: 5.25
I would like to receive your opinion. I will appreciate your help.
moveset: the moves have logic, relevance, intensity
pace of the match: there is a good transition from move to another move
psicology: there is a story in the match
crowd work: the wrestlers make the people invest in the match
I have a scale
10: a piece of art
9: classic
8: excelent
7: very good
6: good
5: average
4: below average
3: bad
2: mediocre
1: auwful
i use the most objective format that i can. I do this because with this i can be more neutral. If it wasn't for this format i would value the matches for my favorites wrestlers higher than the other and i don't want that, i want to be objective.
My favorite wrestler is Triple H and when i didn't use this format i thougth that his matches were the best, but i was wrong. Even matches that i didn't enjoy like triple h matches sometimes get a higher score because there were better. I still love triple h matches but sometimes i have to admit that there wasn't that spectacular. Now i am staring to enjoy the work of all superstar even if i don't like their characters.
I invite you to do this and you will, like me, enjoy more the matches. Sometime i think that the match was awesome but when i review the match seriously i realized that it was an average match.
My rating for the Elimination Chamber 2013:
1. Alberto Del Rio vs Big Show: 5
2. Antonio Cesaro vs The Miz: 6.5
3. Elimination Chamber match: 9.5
4. The Shield vs Sheamus, Ryback & Cena: 5
5. Dolph Ziggler vs Kofi Kingston: 3
6. Tamina Snuka vs Kaitlyn: 1.5
7. The Rock vs Cm Punk: 5.25
I would like to receive your opinion. I will appreciate your help.