WrestleZone Poll: WWE or TNA Fan?

[Motor City Mayhem]

This is simple, I want to see how much of the WrestleZone forums writers are TNA Fans or WWE Fans and why your that companies fan.

My Pick: WWE. As some of you know, I bash TNA whenever I can so I'm going to do it right here.

First off, I am a 100% pure WWE Fan, I've watched TNA once or twice but could never get into it, people say DX is old, Um can anyone say Main Event Mafia? To be fair I have grown up watching WWE so TNA just never really got to me.

Something else is that people say that TNA is so good and that its better for wrestling quality, maybe so but last I counted on a roster or 75, 20+ of your guys are WWE, and 95% of the Main Event is Old Washed up TNA guys.

WWE has the better entertainers , the better storyline's even if reused, a lot more depth at wrestling, even tho TNA has the X-Division WWE has better core of guys.

But Thats just my opinion, I really hope this becomes a sticky note, cause I would like to see everyone respond there personal opinion.

 

[Chris.34]

I voted 50/50 even though I am more like 70/30 WWE. I like both and watch both. AJ Styles Vs Chris Sabin on impact, what a match and why i like TNA, some of the matches they put together are just awesome. But having grown up WWE/F I do watch and enjoy them more. Morrison Vs Meysterio and Taker Vs HBK 2 matches this year that I just marked out on and imo equally as good as the best TNA can offer.

Chris

 

[sugah2300]

I went WWE mainly because TNA from the beginning has been running their mouths like theyre the best thing going, sorry but i dont see 800 tiny wrestlers noone knows but independent fans as being competition to a worldwide company, truly worldwide, not we did a show outside tennesee two weeks ago now were definately cathing up on wwe, and a little message for jeremy borash, before you go bashing wwe every chance you get for small creative shortcomings, two things check the ratings, and two, remember you came from a company, that fell flat on its face for making the same stupid mistakes your own company has made from the beggining.

 

[gd]

My Pick: WWE. As some of you know, I bash TNA whenever I can so I'm going to do it right here.

Ugggghhhh, you're one of those? It's fine that you picked the WWE, but the fact that you are doing it just to bash TNA is ridiculous.

First off, I am a 100% pure WWE Fan, I've watched TNA once or twice but could never get into it,

Then how can you make a judgement on it? Don't knock it till you try it.

people say DX is old, Um can anyone say Main Event Mafia?

Yep, I just said it. Not that hard to do, all you have to do is move your lips the correct way and make a sound.

To be fair I have grown up watching WWE so TNA just never really got to me.

That's fine, but that doesn't mean you have to be a TNA basher.

Something else is that people say that TNA is so good and that its better for wrestling quality

It is.

maybe so but last I counted on a roster or 75, 20+ of your guys are WWE, and 95% of the Main Event is Old Washed up TNA guys.

So AJ Styles, Matt Morgan, and Kurt Angle are old and washed up? I think not. Even Sting is better than a lot of WWE wreslters, and he's 50.

WWE has the better entertainers ,

The MCMG are more entertaining than anyone in the WWE, even Santino.

the better storyline's even if reused,

Nothing in the WWE is as interesting or as intriguing as the current Morgan/Angle storyline or the Sting/Styles storyline.

a lot more depth at wrestling,

What does that mean? Chris Sabin, who hardly ever gets on the show, but on the best match on TV last week.

even tho TNA has the X-Division WWE has better core of guys.

AJ Styles is 50 times better in the ring than anyone of WWE's main eventers, no doubt.

But Thats just my opinion, I really hope this becomes a sticky note, cause I would like to see everyone respond there personal opinion.

My personal opinion? I chose TNA, but I would categorize myself as a wrestling fan instead of a fan of one just one company. However, if you are forcing me to chose, TNA is much more entertaining at the moment. TNA's in ring action has been improving steadily recently now that they've been given more time and they have some great storylines going on right now, especially in the main event.

TNA also has something that the WWE doesn't have, a relevant women's division. I'm not a huge fan of women's wrestling, but the Knockout's give us something fresh and different and it's certainly enough to interest me. The Knockout's in TNA are so much more intersting and unique than the WWE Diva's, and they are able to give us a wide variety of matches and storylines.

So, I'd have to say that I'm a bigger fan of TNA right now. I find myself looking forward to Impact, but not to any of the WWE shows.

 

[Kenny Powers]

This is simple, I want to see how much of the WrestleZone forums writers are TNA Fans or WWE Fans and why your that companies fan.

My Pick: WWE. As some of you know, I bash TNA whenever I can so I'm going to do it right here.

First off, I am a 100% pure WWE Fan, I've watched TNA once or twice but could never get into it, people say DX is old, Um can anyone say Main Event Mafia? To be fair I have grown up watching WWE so TNA just never really got to me.

Something else is that people say that TNA is so good and that its better for wrestling quality, maybe so but last I counted on a roster or 75, 20+ of your guys are WWE, and 95% of the Main Event is Old Washed up TNA guys.

WWE has the better entertainers , the better storyline's even if reused, a lot more depth at wrestling, even tho TNA has the X-Division WWE has better core of guys.

But Thats just my opinion, I really hope this becomes a sticky note, cause I would like to see everyone respond there personal opinion.

I really don't think TNA is comprised of only WWE guys, I don't even think they have 20 former WWE wrestlers on their roster. As far as the MEM being washed up, if you watched Impact last week; not one "washed" up MEM member was even wrestling. Samoa Joe was the only member who even had a match. Believe it or not, that was Russo's booking last week.

Anyways, I've been a fan of WWE since I was a child, but I'm still a fan of TNA. I'm would say 50/50, but recently I just couldn't sit through ECW anymore. I could barely sit through Raw. I prefer TNA but I'm not going to bash WWE. Someone who doesn't watch TNA has no right to bash it, especially just because former WWE wrestlers are working there.

I mean does one person have to stay loyal to one company for their entire lifetime? News Flash..... Michaels and Triple H didn't just start out in WWE, there was Indy feds and WCW too. Someone has to start out somewhere. Also, just because one organization doesn't have anything for a talent such as Matt Morgan. Why is it a crime for them to branch out to another organization where someone will use them?

I'm happy for anyone who goes from ROH to TNA or WWE or vice versa. I'm heartbroken that Angelina Love is gone, but I wouldn't be pissed if she one day ended up on Raw. As long as she was used correctly. Last Monday on Raw, there wasn't one divas match or any matches with Kofi, Swagger or Miz.

One thing WWE will always have is their name and media exposure. I think Bob Barker took away too much from Raw, but they still get decent ratings. TNA cant even promote their show on TV because of DVR problems. If TNA can only get half the exposure of WWE, without compromising their entire show then they will do great. I'll still be a fan. I'll celebrate their success to stardom, and even cheer if the ship is sinking.

 

[Little Jerry Lawler]

This is simple, I want to see how much of the WrestleZone forums writers are TNA Fans or WWE Fans and why your that companies fan.

My Pick: WWE. As some of you know, I bash TNA whenever I can so I'm going to do it right here.

First off, I am a 100% pure WWE Fan, I've watched TNA once or twice but could never get into it, people say DX is old, Um can anyone say Main Event Mafia? To be fair I have grown up watching WWE so TNA just never really got to me.

Something else is that people say that TNA is so good and that its better for wrestling quality, maybe so but last I counted on a roster or 75, 20+ of your guys are WWE, and 95% of the Main Event is Old Washed up TNA guys.

WWE has the better entertainers , the better storyline's even if reused, a lot more depth at wrestling, even tho TNA has the X-Division WWE has better core of guys.

But Thats just my opinion, I really hope this becomes a sticky note, cause I would like to see everyone respond there personal opinion.

DX is old because it's been around for over 10 years. Main Event Mafia has only been around for a year and of course it's comprised of old wrestlers because they've been main eventing for a long time. You should know his this works.

Let me count the wrestlers in TNA who are routinely in the main event: Styles, Angle, Sting, Joe, Morgan. What do we have here? Looks like it's 40% and not 95% which is stupid because you can't have half a person.

Right now I'm 60/40 on enjoying TNA more and lucky it's 40% if it wasn't for Smackdown. They both haven't done well when it comes to storylines but I like TNA's more than WWE's. I'm just more of a fan of TNA wrestling as a whole especially when it comes to the X-Divison. Even though they ****e out gimmick matches like it's nobody's business, they tend to deliver more than the WWE's.

 

[OIL]

The WWE, all the way.

I'm sorry, I've tried to watch TNA multiple times but it just ends with me switching the channel. TNA have some very talented wrestlers, and some very interesting wrestlers who are becoming bigger names. However, compare that to the WWE, and the WWE wins everytime.

Who's TNA's biggest name; Sting/Kurt Angle? Who's WWE's? John Cena. Which is bigger, John Cena.

Which show is more interesting? iMPACT! combines good wrestling with lackluster promo's and an AWFUL lot of gimmick matches. RAW is mostly promo's and building fued's with more entertainment than classic wrestling. Want more wrestling? Tune into SmackDown! where you'll see John Morrison & Rey Mysterio putting on a brilliant match. The WWE has the entertainment part nailed, and the wrestling part, most of the time. TNA just fails to even come close to the standard that the WWE sets.

 

[Nascarman]

Oil how do you get that john Cena is bigger then Kurt angle? Angle is the only olimic gold meldelest in pro wreseling. He has been around for many year and is problably the best ME guy today whatever company you look at. Cena is OK at best. he is new compared to Kurt, and he gets booded a lot of places he goes.
Back to the point I chose 50/50 Smackdown is the best right now in my opion. TNA and Raw go back and forth on witch is better. ECW is ECW
Wrestleing fan should watch Wrestleing the company should not matter.