No Gimmicks Necessary
Dark Match Jobber
I see absolutely no reason why, if he were available, he wouldn't.
To me this is the far more important question.
It's a long way off, and a lot of things can change, but the more I think of it again I can't see any reason why not. There's no reason for Vince or anyone else to bear a grudge against WCW- Vince won. Look at the "Rise and Fall of WCW." If Vince had some ill will still existing towards this entity and the guys it featured Vince could've had his DVD production team make a hatchet job doc that buried WCW. But that's not what happened. Rise and Fall had its flaws, but it came off at least as trying to be fair to the company's legacy for the most part. Plus, form a business standpoint given that he owns the tape library it would behoove his business to perhaps raise interest and awareness of guys like Sting among its younger fanbase (especially once his TNA run is over).
Plus, it's not like location hasn't influenced who was being inducted before. They inducted Verne in Chicago, an old AWA hot bed, The Sheik in Detroit, his hometown and base of operations for BTW, Eddie Graham in Florida, and The Funks and Von Erichs in Texas. (Not so much this year though as Phoenix was never a hot area in the territorial days and the few guys that did make a bit of a name there are virtual unknowns in wrestling history).
So although Vince may be fickle at times I could see him giving a nod WCW's way at this point.
Oh man, I'm going to really show some restraint here because my initial reaction was to tear this "response" to pieces.
First of all, how about a reason why he wouldn't accept seeing as you provide none. That is besides "he never worked for them." Well, if you don't pay attention to the inductions that's your business, but it would be nice if you (and the rest of you that keep regurgitating this inane principle) would read the other posts where people have already pointed out that guys who haven't worked for Vince have already been inducted- it wouldn't be revolutionary. So is your response really that valid?
A hundred times no.
I would also like to point out some other mistakes I've noticed throughout this thread.
Peter Maivia- somebody said he never worked in WWF which is abjectly false. He had several runs through New York and when he did he was one of the hotter mid-card babyfaces. Then later he turned heel and worked with a program with Bob Backlund while he was champ.
Stan Hansen- also worked for the WWF. He had a hot feud with Bruno after kayfabe breaking his neck.
Antonio Inoki- New Japan and WWF had a working relationship throughout the very late 70's/early 80's, one of the results of which was Inoki's phantom WWF title run in '79. As a result of this Inoki wrestled stateside at WWWF cards at MSG competing against guys like Red Bastien and David Schultz (footage of which aired during the the Inoki induction announcement montage, but I guess no one paid attention). In fact upon his first visit to MSG Vincent J. McMahon awarded him the created-just-for-him WWWF Martial Arts Title.
Mad Dog Vachon- Jumped to WWF in 1984 but like fellow AWA alum The Crusher was not on the main roster, per se. He was used more sparingly and primarily to bring in greater numbers at house shows in particular markets (specifically the midwest and Quebec)
I'm not saying these guys made their name in New York, they didn't. Nor am I calling anyone stupid for saying such things because in some cases they're easy to overlook (with the exception of Maivia, which was a huge oversight on the part of whoever posed that). Just saying that some of those guys who have been labeled as having "no ties to WWE" in fact do.
The question I'm asking myself, as many others are, will Vince actually give some kudos to WCW for a change and actually do a WCW theme WWE HOF next year?
To me this is the far more important question.
It's a long way off, and a lot of things can change, but the more I think of it again I can't see any reason why not. There's no reason for Vince or anyone else to bear a grudge against WCW- Vince won. Look at the "Rise and Fall of WCW." If Vince had some ill will still existing towards this entity and the guys it featured Vince could've had his DVD production team make a hatchet job doc that buried WCW. But that's not what happened. Rise and Fall had its flaws, but it came off at least as trying to be fair to the company's legacy for the most part. Plus, form a business standpoint given that he owns the tape library it would behoove his business to perhaps raise interest and awareness of guys like Sting among its younger fanbase (especially once his TNA run is over).
Plus, it's not like location hasn't influenced who was being inducted before. They inducted Verne in Chicago, an old AWA hot bed, The Sheik in Detroit, his hometown and base of operations for BTW, Eddie Graham in Florida, and The Funks and Von Erichs in Texas. (Not so much this year though as Phoenix was never a hot area in the territorial days and the few guys that did make a bit of a name there are virtual unknowns in wrestling history).
So although Vince may be fickle at times I could see him giving a nod WCW's way at this point.
No, a hundred times no.
Sting will never accept the HOF offer.
He never went to WWE in the first place, so why would he accept an HOF invitation from a company he's never worked for (yes, I know, irony, they own WCW, basically he's in one way or another worked for them).
Oh man, I'm going to really show some restraint here because my initial reaction was to tear this "response" to pieces.
First of all, how about a reason why he wouldn't accept seeing as you provide none. That is besides "he never worked for them." Well, if you don't pay attention to the inductions that's your business, but it would be nice if you (and the rest of you that keep regurgitating this inane principle) would read the other posts where people have already pointed out that guys who haven't worked for Vince have already been inducted- it wouldn't be revolutionary. So is your response really that valid?
A hundred times no.
I would also like to point out some other mistakes I've noticed throughout this thread.
Peter Maivia- somebody said he never worked in WWF which is abjectly false. He had several runs through New York and when he did he was one of the hotter mid-card babyfaces. Then later he turned heel and worked with a program with Bob Backlund while he was champ.
Stan Hansen- also worked for the WWF. He had a hot feud with Bruno after kayfabe breaking his neck.
Antonio Inoki- New Japan and WWF had a working relationship throughout the very late 70's/early 80's, one of the results of which was Inoki's phantom WWF title run in '79. As a result of this Inoki wrestled stateside at WWWF cards at MSG competing against guys like Red Bastien and David Schultz (footage of which aired during the the Inoki induction announcement montage, but I guess no one paid attention). In fact upon his first visit to MSG Vincent J. McMahon awarded him the created-just-for-him WWWF Martial Arts Title.
Mad Dog Vachon- Jumped to WWF in 1984 but like fellow AWA alum The Crusher was not on the main roster, per se. He was used more sparingly and primarily to bring in greater numbers at house shows in particular markets (specifically the midwest and Quebec)
I'm not saying these guys made their name in New York, they didn't. Nor am I calling anyone stupid for saying such things because in some cases they're easy to overlook (with the exception of Maivia, which was a huge oversight on the part of whoever posed that). Just saying that some of those guys who have been labeled as having "no ties to WWE" in fact do.