Why does WWE favor Stone Cold to The Rock?

That's only because Rock came back. Austin has no affiliation with the company and they treat him better.

Austin has no "official" affiliation with the company, but he's on good terms with them and is basically a phone call away, provided that he's given a good angle/reason to be an onscreen presence. 2011-2013 was spent putting over Rock at every opportunity.

Also If you honestly think that Cm Punk is the 2nd top star of the past 7-8 years then you must not have heard of Batista, Randy Orton, Edge, Chris Jericho, or HHH. You know people who were constantly in the title picture and um actually drew money?

First of all, I don't count Edge, Jericho, or HHH because they were all established main eventers prior to 2007. I'm talking about newly-minted stars. If Orton had that drawing power, he would've faced Rock instead of Punk; he didn't. Batista is the only one you can make an argument for, but he wasn't with the company at the time of Rock's return.

In terms of mainstream media attention and merchandise sales, Punk blows all of them (besides Jericho and HHH, who made their name in the Attitude era) away. Punk walking out was a mainstream news story; Batista leaving in 2010 or returning in 2014 was not (and before you say a return is different from a walk-out, let's note that Rock's return in 2011--and his return to action the following year--were both covered by mainstream news).
 
Stone Cold took WWF which was on the verge of bankruptcy and helped WWF monoplozie professional wrestling by beating the mighty NWO led by Hulk Hogan. The Rock was a huge star too but by the time he reached the top, WWF had won the Monday Night Wars and was having a huge wave momentum set up by Stone Cold. Both are great stars but I would place Stone Cold higher because he led a weaker WWF against a much stronger WCW
 
WWE talks of Austin like God.

Source/Quote: Also in the Nov 22nd 2010 Observe, Dave Meltzer said : "Austin was largely the one responsible for the explosion of the business that allowed them to take out an IPO and put them in a unmatched financial category."

WWF going public was Vince's most profitable decision.
 
That'd be simple, because Stone Cold Steve Austin > The Rock. The End.

But IMO the WWE was actually favoring The Rock the last couple of years, probably because he was the WWE Champion heading into Wrestlemania 29 & because of Dwayne's Hollywood fame, connections, etc.

I think their amount of recognition is starting to balance out again though since SCSA has been making more appearances for the WWE lately & Rocky is back in "Tinsel Town".
 
Rocky84, Rock DID have great people to work with: Triple H, Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit and Chris Jericho.

Your Bleacher Report article and comments were from 2010. A lot of fans soured on Rock after his lackluster return last year. Rock did the exact same things he did from 1999-2003, but now those things were played out.
C.M. Punk, whom can get a good match out of anybody, was only able to get two mediocre matches out of The Rock.

Rock shouldn't have returned for WrestleMania XXIX.
 
Rocky84, Rock DID have great people to work with: Triple H, Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit and Chris Jericho.

Your Bleacher Report article and comments were from 2010. A lot of fans soured on Rock after his lackluster return last year. Rock did the exact same things he did from 1999-2003, but now those things were played out.
C.M. Punk, whom can get a good match out of anybody, was only able to get two mediocre matches out of The Rock.

Rock shouldn't have returned for WrestleMania XXIX.

You clearly aren't the sharpest tool in the box are you? Did you not read where I stated TWICE that Jericho, and Angle at that time were nothing but a WCW Cruiserweight and an inexperienced beginner???? They were not like they are now. And you're comparing them to a prime Bret, HBK (DX and Tyson too) and Undertaker...plus Vince. You have to be crazy to do that.

That article I posted was from 2010 BUT IT WAS REFERRING TO THE ATTITUDE ERA. It doesn't matter that it wasn't recent, it's not even talking about The Rock now...that's irrelevant dude.

Rock haters act like the Rock is some garbage wrestler when there are full time wrestlers who've put on worst matches than him (keep in mind he's been gone for 8 years) on the big stage.

Undertaker/HHH at 27 sucked, HBK vs Cena at 23 was mediocre, HHH vs Jericho at 18 sucked, and there's many more. So singling the Rock out as if he's the only person ever to have a match that didn't live up to the hype is ridiculous. Get off his jock. He's there for entertainment and to put on a good show. To say he shouldn't have come back just shows you're a hater. Plain n simple.

I'm just going to take it as your inability to comprehend what I'm saying even though I'm making it crystal clear.
 
First of all, I don't count Edge, Jericho, or HHH because they were all established main eventers prior to 2007. I'm talking about newly-minted stars. If Orton had that drawing power, he would've faced Rock instead of Punk; he didn't. Batista is the only one you can make an argument for, but he wasn't with the company at the time of Rock's return.

In terms of mainstream media attention and merchandise sales, Punk blows all of them (besides Jericho and HHH, who made their name in the Attitude era) away. Punk walking out was a mainstream news story; Batista leaving in 2010 or returning in 2014 was not (and before you say a return is different from a walk-out, let's note that Rock's return in 2011--and his return to action the following year--were both covered by mainstream news).

First of all, if thats the case then all of them wouldn't count because Batista and Cena included were established main eventers. And you said 7-8 years meaning 2006-2007. Chris Jericho was not a main eventer, he won the world title once prior to his 2007 return and even then he rarely closed the show and pretty much got the Cm Punk treatment when he was the champion. Edge didn't win his first title until 2006 and even then wasn't really considered a main eventer until his Undertaker feud. And you said 2 biggest stars. How does that constitute newly minted? Especially considering John Cena had been a main eventer since 2005. And Rock is a completely different ball game than Batista. Rock had been a huge movie star by the time he returned AND he had been gone for nearly a decade. Batista had a few small roles in a few bad movies and was gone for 4 years which really isn't that long when you think about it. Big difference. And besides, Batista didn't just up and leave in the middle of a storyline. Cm Punk did, again big difference.

And you said in terms of merch sales Punk blows them away??? That is so laughable it's ridiculous. Cm Punk barely sold merch. There's no way that at a time where theres only approximately 14 million fans that he could outsell guys who were around when the fanbase was much higher. Especially Orton considering Orton has historically been a great merch seller and pretty mcuh the only guy who could have contested Cena in that area. Also Orton did face Rock back when he was an up and comer so it would have been pointless especially when Cm Punk was already involved in the story. The simple fact that he rarely main evented proved that. That's actually the biggest reason WWE didn't want him main eventing because his merch sales weren't that great. Sure they were better than most of the roster but being the best of the worst isn't something to brag about. And it wasn't a mainstream story when he left. TMZ reports anything dealing with anyone on TV. They report shit about TNA wrestlers, what does that tell you? It only seemed like Punk leaving was mainstream news because you go on sites like this that constantly update his situation.
 
Your points are weak and biased. Especially when you twist the quality of workers they each had. You mention 1997, but say Bret left. You mention Mania 14, but say HBK left. You don't acknowledge that Austin worked long programs with them before their departure though lol. How convenient. wtf do you think helped Austin get to that level??? Working with Bret and HBK!!!!

Then, when they left he started with Vince. Then he went on to the Undertaker and then The Rock. That's how it happened. Don't bullshit.

Rocky had great talent to work with??? A friggin Cruiserweight from WCW at the time in Jericho? Angle who was brand new to the damn business? Foley who was as appealing to the main stream and casual fans as a fat ugly janitor, and then HHH. And you're comparing the two groups????? Wow. You conveniently don't acknowledge anything I say and just side step it and make up your own shit with a spin on it to favor Austin. It's blatantly obvious dude.

I don't understand your need to downplay and discredit great wrestlers in order to prop up the Rock. Isn't that exactly what you have said over and over again that you hate about Austin fans? That they need to make the Rock seem less important to try to support Austin?

In regards to Mick Foley, the Rock's feud with Foley helped put the Rock over as the biggest heel in the WWE and gave him the heat he needed to face Austin at Wrestlemania. Part of the Rock's success was built on Foley's brain cells so I would have hoped the Rock's fans would at least appreciate him.

Regarding Jericho the idea that he was unknown is just ridiculous. Every wrestling fan knew who Jericho was. He was one of the most talented in ring and mic performers in the WCW, and was being underutilized while he was with the promotion. If Jericho was just this unknown quantity as you suggest, then how did his RAW debut receive one of the loudest pops I have ever heard? Wrestling fans knew Jericho and wanted him in the WWF. He was in his prime the moment he stepped on to RAW.

Concerning Angle, yeah he was new to the business but the man was a natural. That's why he was able to achieve such success. To simply say oh he was new to the business, so therefore the Rock had nothing to work downplays Angle's skills and talents.

Personally I like both Austin and the Rock fan and never really got in to the hate between the fans of each. If WWE favors Austin (I personally don't think they do) it's only because he came first and at a critical time (as many have already stated) I'm also a huge Jericho, Foley, and Angle mark so to see you dismiss them like that is bothersome to me.
 
By 2000, Jericho was no longer a "WCW cruiserweight," and Angle, although new, was still very good. I haven't brought up Shawn, Bret or Taker, so I don't know where you got that from.

When Austin was on top, he had help, but to act like Rock did everything on his own ("WCW Cruiserweight") is laughable.

The Rock's tired act last year showed why the most overrated man in sports entertainment should have stayed away.
 
I don't understand your need to downplay and discredit great wrestlers in order to prop up the Rock. Isn't that exactly what you have said over and over again that you hate about Austin fans? That they need to make the Rock seem less important to try to support Austin?

In regards to Mick Foley, the Rock's feud with Foley helped put the Rock over as the biggest heel in the WWE and gave him the heat he needed to face Austin at Wrestlemania. Part of the Rock's success was built on Foley's brain cells so I would have hoped the Rock's fans would at least appreciate him.

Regarding Jericho the idea that he was unknown is just ridiculous. Every wrestling fan knew who Jericho was. He was one of the most talented in ring and mic performers in the WCW, and was being underutilized while he was with the promotion. If Jericho was just this unknown quantity as you suggest, then how did his RAW debut receive one of the loudest pops I have ever heard? Wrestling fans knew Jericho and wanted him in the WWF. He was in his prime the moment he stepped on to RAW.

Concerning Angle, yeah he was new to the business but the man was a natural. That's why he was able to achieve such success. To simply say oh he was new to the business, so therefore the Rock had nothing to work downplays Angle's skills and talents.

Personally I like both Austin and the Rock fan and never really got in to the hate between the fans of each. If WWE favors Austin (I personally don't think they do) it's only because he came first and at a critical time (as many have already stated) I'm also a huge Jericho, Foley, and Angle mark so to see you dismiss them like that is bothersome to me.


Dude...how am I putting down any of them to build up the Rock? I'm really shocked at some of the ridiculous responses I'm getting here. Am I speaking Chinese or something?

Was Angle new? Yes. How is that putting him down? Nobody knew who he was so that didn't exactly entice the casual fan to tune in to watch him the way they would Bret or HBK or Taker.

Was Jericho a recent WCW Cruiserweight? Yes. How is that putting him down? He needed to be built up, and eventually he was, but what I'm saying is that he was nowhere near the level of Austin's competition at the time. How is this hard to understand? And why is that offensive? It's true. Stop being so sensitive. I'm not hating on Jericho at all...I like him, but what I'm saying Austin fans do to the Rock is COMPLETELY different. They just hate on him and insult him...when did I do this?

Foley, I loved him too, but again....all I said was that he was not as marketable or as appealing clearly as Austin's main opponents. How is this knocking him? He obviously was not as flashy as HBK or intriguing as The Undertaker to the main stream and casual fans.

Again, all I'm saying is that if Rock had a chance to work with all those guys at Wrestlemania, where do you think he'd be within the company? Rock vs HBK, or Rock vs Bret, both at Wrestlemania or the first to start a breakout fued with Vince.

Instead he got lesser talent through 1999-2001 and still pulled in the greatest year in the company. This isn't rocket science. I'm not out to offend anyone or their favorite wrestler. I'm just bringing up an obvious point that The Rock had less popular talent to work with at the time yet produced better numbers. Plain n simple.





By 2000, Jericho was no longer a "WCW cruiserweight," and Angle, although new, was still very good. I haven't brought up Shawn, Bret or Taker, so I don't know where you got that from.

When Austin was on top, he had help, but to act like Rock did everything on his own ("WCW Cruiserweight") is laughable.

The Rock's tired act last year showed why the most overrated man in sports entertainment should have stayed away.


I got the Bret, HBK and Undertaker stuff from the time I brought it up genius. Or were you not paying attention or just reading what you wanted to read? I seriously am done with responses to you since you're too feeble minded to understand anything I say since it has to be repeated over and over to you and you just keep up with the wrestler bashing like you did in your last sentence.

The Rock didn't do it on his own obviously...I never ever said that (goes to show your comprehension skills) but he sure as hell didn't have the help Austin did....that's what I DID say.
 
James Greiga, I don't want to get into an internet flame war with you, especially since most of what we're alleging is subjective. However, I have to highlight this:

Cm Punk barely sold merch. There's no way that at a time where theres only approximately 14 million fans that he could outsell guys who were around when the fanbase was much higher. Especially Orton considering Orton has historically been a great merch seller and pretty mcuh the only guy who could have contested Cena in that are

I'm not sure what your sources are, but everyone from Punk to WWE themselves have said that Punk was the first superstar in 5-6 years (from when he dropped his pipebomb in 2011) to have his merch sales match Cena's (with his white "Best in the World" tee actually being the first to beat Cena in years). Since then, he's consistently been a close number two to Cena in merch sales, and it's a big reason behind why WWE finally got behind him as an establishment figure. Punk alluded to this himself in his January 2013 promo against the Rock--" You don't get noticed until you start to move a couple of t-shirts around here."
 
Anyway, to succinctly sum up my take on Austin and Rock's positions in WWE history/lore:
Stone Cold Steve Austin = The Beatles of the Attitude Era
The Rock = The Rolling Stones of the Attitude Era
 
Another talent of Austin was the ability to constantly reinvent himself.

Not only were his segments with Vince and Angle some of the funniest I've seen in wrestling, they're actually some of the funniest scenes I've seen, period.

Also nobody has mentioned "What" yet. In the twighlight of his career he managed to pull something off so huge it consumed the whole industry. "What" was a phenomenon like no other.
 
I don't think they do favor Austin over the Rock at all. To me it seems, and has for a while, that they actually favor the Rock over Austin. Maybe that's because Austin walked out on Vince later on in his career and the WWE still holds a grudge against him for that. Maybe its because Austin can't wrestle anymore and is very limited, where the Rock is still younger and can still wrestle and be a star when and if he does come back around. I don't really know, but I definitely feel like the Rock is treated as a bigger star then Austin now in the WWE.

The Rock was the one who fought Hulk Hogan, not Austin. Austin was given Scott Hall and the booking plan was for Hall to go OVER Austin, which is one of the reasons Austin began to sour on the WWE upto his "walk out" on them.

Austin has been used here and there over the years, returning to play certain roles within the WWE, but his returns have always felt less important and seem less hyped by the WWE then whenever the Rock is involved in something. So I personally feel its the opposite of what the OP is saying. The Rock is favored over Austin.
 
Your points are weak and biased. Especially when you twist the quality of workers they each had. You mention 1997, but say Bret left. You mention Mania 14, but say HBK left. You don't acknowledge that Austin worked long programs with them before their departure though lol. How convenient. wtf do you think helped Austin get to that level??? Working with Bret and HBK!!!!


I like how you twist my words to get a completely different meaning. I said that when Austin was given the ball to run with, he had very few main event caliber wrestlers to work with and the WWE roster was very weak at the time.
But when The Rock got the ball to run with, he had half a dozen main eventers alongside him and with a fully stacked roster.
 
Let me just clear up the debate about getting a larger fan reaction. I have attended more than two hundred WWE shows (Televised, Non-televised and pay per views) over the years. Out of those at least 12-15 were shows in which Austin and Rock were the two top baby faces of the company, and in every show that I attended, Austin always got a bigger reaction from the fans in the arena. Not just the reaction, but the whole buzz in the arena during the shows have been about Austin. Who Austin is wrestling? What is Austin doing? What Austin did last week on television? Among the fans in the arena, Austin has always been the first priority. Even during the build up to Survivor Series 2001, the main event of most house shows was Rock and Austin, with Rock going over. Let me tell you, that didn't sit too well with the fans in the arena, and there were always quite a few boos directed towards the Rock. Austin also got a larger crowd reaction during his entrance in these matches.

I do not know about who sold more pay per views or who sold more merchandise or who made WWE more money. But I know for a fact that Austin was more over with the fans in the arenas than Rock was.


I have also been to quite a few shows during that period...every time I went it was nothing like you say. At all. How on earth you were able to speak to and listen to 18,000 people wondering who Austin is fighting and what Austin did last week is beyond me. Maybe a select few but to speak on behalf of the entire arena? I've never heard Rock being booed against Austin while both were faces...maybe it happens in Texas or a surrounding area, but not where I was attending (NJ/NY) and I've never seen that or heard that on tv either. People just need to go back and watch some tape and see/listen for themselves...it's not that hard. I remember this distinctly because I was always surprised by the pops he got while I was there and watching on tv, plus the Raw reports always confirming that.
 
You are absolutely right, it's my wrong. I cant speak for all the fans in the arena. But the general buzz was always surrounding Steve Austin. Everytime I went to a show, the people around me were mostly talking about Steve Austin. In every show that I went, and only one was in Texas. Steve Austin always got a bigger crowd reaction, I know I was there. At that point of time, fans were more interested in Steve Austin and what he was doing. That is the truth. Whether any of you choose to believe it or not. Either way, I am out. Tata.


Kinda contradictory to say you're wrong in the aspect of knowing what everyone was interested in and then saying that they were interested in Austin and that is the truth. Don't you think? lol not trying to be a ball buster but just pointing that out. Because I was a fan, and I didn't feel that way...so that right there negates that statement.

I'm simply just judging from what I heard as far as crowd reaction/pop...something simple as a loud noise as well as what was being reported by column writers at that particular time...on this particular website.
 
What? (Pardon the pun)

I pretty much stopped caring about Austin when he started the second most annoying chant in WWE history, ie the "What?" chant.

Initially The Rock was pushed to the moon for the same reason as Randy Orton, he was the first third generation Superstar in the then WWF, pre-ceded by his Grandfather the late great "High Chief" Peter Miavia, and then his old man "Soul Man" Rocky Johnson, but unlike Randy (IMO) The Rock more than lived up to his family legacy as evident by joining his old man in the Hall of Fame a couple of years back.
 
To compare 2 generations I'd put it like this:

Austin was Hogan....
Rock was Macho Man...

Both drew great, both got insane reactions but, for whatever reason the former had that slight better connection with the audience. Not exactly a crime, Macho/Rock both had amazing charisma and connected with the crowd greatly but Hogan/Austin were that bit more connected. Rather amazing to think that 2 generations out of 3 (Bret/HBK were nowhere near any of their levels) that there were 2 such charismatic stars..
 
I haven't read all 10 pages of this thread, but I vote for The Rock being the bigger of the 2. I guess we all like to forget that every Friday, there is a show called SmackDown, based on The Rock's catchphrase, not Stone Cold's. The Rock was just as popular by mid 1999 as Stone Cold was and his impact is still lasting. The Rock told a better story in the ring, miles ahead of Austin on the mic and hosted SNL. SCSA did not. He appeared on Madtv, the 2nd tier of Saturday night sketch shows. Before the movies, The Rock was hugely popular, on the cover of Rolling Stone, appeared at the Democratic National Convention, presented the Xbox to the world etc. all while a full time wrestler.
 
Think it's because The Rock chose to leave and buried wrestling for a few years and wanted nothing to do w/ it before he returned while Austin had no choice about leaving when he could no longer compete in the ring and he would return when they asked him.

I think The Rock was the bigger star of the 2 as a whole but when he chose Hollywood it upset some fans and some w/in the WWE but I often wonder if Austin made decent movies if he wouldn't have left sooner.
 
Think it's because The Rock chose to leave and buried wrestling for a few years and wanted nothing to do w/ it before he returned while Austin had no choice about leaving when he could no longer compete in the ring and he would return when they asked him.

This right here. That is exactly why I believe WWE prefers Stone Cold to The Rock and why I do as well. It was extremely rude of The Rock to disown his wrestling past for those years, a big middle finger to the fans who had supported him and looked up to him. His return was enjoyable, but things will never be like they were 10+ years ago. He'll never fully earn back my respect, although his return helped. Austin, on the other hand, never lost my respect. WWE might very well have similar opinions, and that has to be why they prefer Stone Cold out of the two top attitude era stars.
 
I haven't read all 10 pages of this thread, but I vote for The Rock being the bigger of the 2. I guess we all like to forget that every Friday, there is a show called SmackDown, based on The Rock's catchphrase, not Stone Cold's. The Rock was just as popular by mid 1999 as Stone Cold was and his impact is still lasting. The Rock told a better story in the ring, miles ahead of Austin on the mic and hosted SNL. SCSA did not. He appeared on Madtv, the 2nd tier of Saturday night sketch shows. Before the movies, The Rock was hugely popular, on the cover of Rolling Stone, appeared at the Democratic National Convention, presented the Xbox to the world etc. all while a full time wrestler.

Well for one MadTV was not 2nd tier to SNL at that time. Until about 2001, MadTV was dominating the bland SNL because by that point it's biggest stars had left (Adam Sandler, Rob Schnieder, Chris Farley, David Spade, etc.) it was in a huge slump. Rock wasn't miles ahead of Austin on the mic either. Sure he had more charisma and a better stage presence but Austin could cut a promo better. 60% of every Rock promo was the same catchphrases we heard in the one right before that. And most of that only occurred while Austin was gone so he had a chance to capitalize. Not to mention there was no campaigning going on during Austin's run in 1999 but there was for rock's in 2000

P.S. this isn't really relevant but it was the Republican National Convention
 
Really, if we're being fair, a comparison of the two is going to draw parallels -- Regardless of who the bigger star was, both were marquis draws for the company which sent them on parallel courses of success.

For me, Austin's always been more of the "wrestling" draw, since he had an avid passion for the business back then, as did Rock. When he made a media appearance, he usually did something wrestling related, like when he threw Vince in the ocean (river, maybe, forgot the city it took place in). Any of his appearances had something relevant to wrestling, like when he appeared on a talk show, there was one, "Use the words "Vince McMahon" and "Can of whoop ass" in the same sentence".

Rock's appearances were more media oriented. Austin was more symbolic with wrestling because that's where he made his mark. Austin didn't have a legacy of ancestors that made him an instant buzz -- He hit his mark DURING the Attitude Era, and what he was doing then. I'm not saying Rock rode the curt-tails of his relatives by any means. Rocky Johnson, his father, and the High Chief, his grandfather, were well-known wrestling legends, so he had a preset legacy just because of his lineage in the wrestling line. That's why Patterson brought him in. Rock was able to reach out and speak with him personally, since his father KNEW Patterson.


In my eyes, Rock's always been the more media and "crossover" oriented guy. While he did wrestling tidbits in most of his media appearances, he was more 'relative' talking. This is really hard for me to word without stepping on toes, so I'll be as front about it as I can: A lot of Rock's media appearances didn't just focus on wrestling, but his appearances gave off the "movie star" vibe, even if he wasn't one at the time. In mainstream media for the time, you could say Austin was the bigger draw when it came to being focused on wrestling, since he WAS the top-buzz at the time. Rock, however, felt like it was more easy for him to relate on non-wrestling focused stuff, since he had that natural vibe. Austin would do something or discuss a wrestling topic, which Rock did, but he had more 'flexibility', in that he could talk about non-wrestling topics or other areas of discussion. Austin just felt more wrestling-focused on his appearances, for me, anyway.

Again, I'm not knocking either one. Comparing the two, Austin's broken merchandising, box-office wrestling records, and other accomplishments that left Hogan and Flair behind as well, but the Rock did a damn good job of carrying by him.

This debate has gone on since 2002, but really, it's not fair to either performer, since they spoke to two different types of fans. Rock was, in my opinion, superior to Austin in being entertaining on the microphone. Anytime Rock got a microphone, you knew whoever the segment was with, or about, they were going to be destroyed verbally, and you were going to laugh your ass off.

Austin was more of the, "I ain't gonna stand here and make rhymes; I'm going to come up there and whoop your damn ass, son!".

They played off two different sets of fans that, while both men have certain advantages over the other, both were immensely popular. Austin propelled the WWE into the Attitude Era, which earned him a spot. Rock had his own moments, sure, but Austin was the one who pushed the envelope with the material they did, and was the first "mold" to break from the "take your vitamins, say your prayers" stick that WWE had been doing for years, and became the first anti-hero to be that popular. Rock's character that made him popular didn't start emerging until mid-'98, since people hated his babyface persona before the Nation run.


I suppose if you wanted to look at it a certain way -- Austin, and DX, springboard the company into the Attitude Era, while Rock was beginning to find his groove as 'The Rock', but he IMMEDIATELY became a break-out start well into the Attitude Era. Rock became a break-out star during the Attitude Era, which made him a top-guy, but Austin, and to a lesser extent, DX, ushered IN the Attitude Era, which gave Rock the opportunity to become someone who rivaled Austin in popularity.

Had Austin and DX not done that... Rock would have either been in WCW, or somewhere else. I do firmly believe the Rock could replace Austin in being the staple of the Attitude Era, had Austin not become "Stone Cold", but he didn't become "The Rock" until after Wrestlemania XIV. I mean, sure, he did the first-person and he was somewhat with steam in 1997, but he REALLY gained momentum in the summer and autumn after Wrestlemania XIV, which lead to the Survivor Series in '98 which cemented his popularity and capitalized on it. Until '1998, I felt that Rock was beginning to get steam, but he didn't have that "momentum" that he did when they did the switch at Survivor Series, which, as Rock said, "bucked tradition" and made him a sensational hit. After '98, Rock hit heights with Austin, both together and against, financially and drawing-wise.

Rock himself has even said he was the number-two during that period, since he came after the Attitude Era's genesis.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top