You can win a debate, Brian, but you can't PROVE an opinion. Sly wins some of his debates because he backs up a lot of his points with facts.
and so have I.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You can win a debate, Brian, but you can't PROVE an opinion. Sly wins some of his debates because he backs up a lot of his points with facts.
Well, Sly is smarter than you.
and he is a helluva lot smarter than you.
Well I was going to go watch I Am Legend, but this is probably just as amusing
Same goes for me, when I lose I will admit it, but until that day comes i am gonna keep on arguing. Which i have clearly done, where i have been right, you have been wrong. Get over it.
Hmmm, I wasn't in that debate/argument, but you clearly lost that one. You made posts saying ECW was better than WCW, Even though ECW clearly sucked. If they were any good they'd still be on air, and I am not talking about this crap that the WWE puts out.
is that the movie with Will Smith?
and he is a helluva lot smarter than you.
SO basically, Brian is saying:
Sly > Brian > DIAR
Bri, if the "Greater Than" sign on your computer breaks, what will happen to you?
SO basically, Brian is saying:
Sly > Brian > DIAR
Bri, if the "Greater Than" sign on your computer breaks, what will happen to you?
Denial you are.
If WCW was any good they be on the air. And RVDgurl and others liked ECW better as well, just like millions like TNA better than WWE. You lost.
Yep. Looks pretty good too.
By why does WWE do ratings in the 3's, when ECW and TNA were doing ratings in the ones? Clearly more people like WWE over ECW and TNA.
I have several keyboards, I have 3 old computers, and i bought a new keyboard, and mouse earlier today. So that breaking on all of them is highly unlikely. Plus i have a laptop.
I said millions like them better, not the majority.![]()
So you are saying that you have an endless supply of ">" signs, and as a result will continue to debate for ever and ever.
How would millions like it better, when the WWE's ratings are higher? Therefore those 1 million and some viewers have no affect on the WWE because they have been doing ratings steadily in the 3's for quite some time.
Well no, I have several keyboards, and I could fix the keyboard more than likely if it were to break. Unless it cracks, then I am screwed.
Ladies and gentlemen, another lost arguement for brian.You don't need to do higher ratings to say some like TNA better, a lot do.
Well be careful. I'd hate to think you may not be able to use your debate trump card in the NFL Playoffs, provided Pittsburgh makes it.
But that is overshadowed because more people still watch the WWE. Apparently those people that like TNA are not doing to much of a burden in Vinces Wallet. ECW, and now TNA are never gonna be capable of doing ratings like raw. Why? Vince is a great businessman. ECW was shit, and if it was any good it would still be running. TNA appeals to roughly 1 million fans. That is like 1/3 of the WWE's.
Wow, I just caught up to the end of this argument.
I think Brain is definately annoying due to the fact that he will continually attack your post if you disagree with even one word he says. I disagreed with Brain in the qb thread but still agreed that big ben could be considered by some better than Romo and Brain still went nuts.
On the other hand, thais what these boards are for.
You missed the point again.Look back and read what I said again.