Misawa was a huge draw the problem was that his drawing was with the other big draws. But he was the biggest
His biggest problem was, like I said, the population. And NJPW and AJPW worked different regions. From the sources I've gathered it seems like they were both equal in most numbers, but I give Misawa the edge as a draw over Hashimoto because AJPW expanded while NJPW did not. NJPW was already bigger than AJPW by the start of the 90's thanks to Inoki being a bigger star and more audacious businessman than Baba.
Well, it's a major influence with the indies including ROH, so I'd say it had some effect on the world scene.
ROH is shit though. And when I was watching it years ago seemed they took more from NJPW. AJPW still booked feuds, had story lines, had angles and promos. NJPW really didn't. They were like way old school in that regard.
Whatever ROH took they obviously utilized it wrong.
I think that Misawa's death had more to do with that than anything. Difference in opinion and all. But that said I see your points and they are very logical. I think Misawa is a bigger name in Japan than Gange is here. Misawa was the number one guy in probably the most talented era(arguable but it had the best ME sense imo) of all time.
I'd disagree with that. But it's hard to say with 100 accuracy. What I do know is that the AWA ran longer than NOAH did. So that's a point for Gagne. He's also more comparable to Inoki as a star than he is Cena... or Misawa in this case. That's another point.
Agree but Race is no Misawa imo. Maybe i'm overstating Misawa, he's my second favorite wrestler of all time. He drew like a monster in a small country and kept himself on top for 24 years in two companies that were huge when he was on top
Maybe. But then again people were saying I was crazy for arguing that Misawa was a bigger star than Taker. As if Undy was the biggest star in the WWE not named Hogan.
Agreed, Misawa being in a small population does hurt, but his legacy to me is as big as any.
It really does. People will look at the numbers and be like "he drew 2,500 people to this one show. That's fucking terrible."
Not really. Considering that town maybe had less than 100,000 people living there. RAW during the AE would be damn lucky to pull 20,000 out of a city with a million+. So adjusted they don't look that bad. Especially considering the big numbers that both NJPW and AJPW were putting up for PPV's.
I'm just happy I can have a debate with someone that actually doesn't have that mindset lol. I hardly ever talk about Misawa on here because it might be a waste of time. That said, once I saw Santo and Rikidozan on your list I rush to it lol.
Santo defeated Rock and Sting in the WZT last year. Good times. Don't care if he drew Mexico City. Punk beat HBK because he drew Chicago. It was only fair.
So yeah, John Cena deserves to be in the top 5 if you consider drawing ability. And he clearly has wrestling and promo skills. But I can think of a couple dozen people who I think are more talented than him in various categories who have been in the WWF/WWE over the years. And they aren't just mid-card, nostalgia picks either I genuinely think they're better. I don't think he can hold a candle to guys who are touted less than Rock/Austin/Hogan/Flair/Hart for their contributions to pro-wrestling. Steamboat, Mr. Perfect, Chris Jericho or Kurt Angle, for example. Outsell them, sure, a bigger star, yeah, but certainly not more talented.
For anybody approaching this from the viewpoint of 'Cena has made a lot of money' try approaching it from the viewpoint of 'Given the choice, would I rather watch Cena than X'.
Pro wrestling as a whole only has one type of fan that they cater to. True, there are different styles, but they cater to fans across different countries. In the end all pro wrestling companies want to make money by selling that product. Its a competition. It's not like music/movies etc that have multiple different types of fans that are catered to. Justin Beiber is not competing for the people that listen to Amon Amarth. But TNA, WWE, ROH, CHIKARA etc do compete for the same fan pool.
And in the end we can use the same criteria to grade them all. Even the wrestlers from a billion years ago.
Using the logic from your last paragraph... if more fans wanted to the see Wrestler X than Cena, then X would be pushed higher up the card. If he isn't then that means that more fans would rather see Cena.