What Do You Guys Think For My Prediction For Lesnar's Road To Wrestlemania

[delboy]

This thread is on the assumption that Lesnar is indeed going to wrestle taker at mania.

We all saw on Raw Lesnar says he doesn't need to enter the Royal Rumble to get a Title shot

So Lesnar said on Raw he doesn't need to enter the rumble so i think he's gonna have a match against Henry at Royal Rumble and then the next night on raw he will challenge John Cena for the Title (yes cena beats orton at RR) at Elimination Chamber to which of course Cena accepts, So at Elimination Chamber Cena gets a beat down and just as Lesnar is about to finish off cena the lights go out and a huge gong sounds around the arena and brock gets distracted and when the lights come back on Cena hits an AA on Lesnar and Cena picks up the victory.

Next night on Raw Lesnar challenges Taker to a match at Wrestlemania and says he's the one who's going to break the streak as Taker cost him the title.

Who wins?
You decide?
So do you think WWE could go down this route to build towards Taker vs Brock. seems the most logical choice imo.

 

[LODemolition]

It's not bad. I hope you're wrong about Cena becoming champion yet again anytime soon, though. I don't think Lesnar is going to get a 1-on-1 title shot at EC. I think we're going to see Orton, Cena, Lesnar, Batista, Bryan, and Punk.

Now if Lesnar is one of the final 2, I can totally see the gong sounding, the lights going out, and Taker costing Lesnar the match. I just don't think Cena will be the one who benefits from it. I think Orton or Batista is likely to be that guy. I say that because it sounds very likely that Cena is going to be involved somehow in Hogan's match, whether he be his opponent or tag team partner.

I wouldn't completely discount the possibility of Lesnar winning at EC, then Taker comes out, and they actually have a Title vs Streak match at Mania. Taker could always win and lose it back the next night or at Extreme Rules.

 

[MattRhys20]

Now if Lesnar is one of the final 2, I can totally see the gong sounding, the lights going out, and Taker costing Lesnar the match. I just don't think Cena will be the one who benefits from it. I think Orton or Batista is likely to be that guy. I say that because it sounds very likely that Cena is going to be involved somehow in Hogan's match, whether he be his opponent or tag team partner.
.

That sounds rather similar to 2010, when HBK popped up during the chamber match and sweet-chinned Taker to cost him the title

 

[LODemolition]

That sounds rather similar to 2010, when HBK popped up during the chamber match and sweet-chinned Taker to cost him the title

Maybe, but if I understood the OP correctly, Taker doesn't actually appear. Just the gong goes off and the lights go out.

 

[TheOneAndOnlyGOAT]

I think this is stup!d for many reasons.

First, Lesnar only wrestles 3 times a year. Wasting one of his matches on a guy he already lost against and faced many times (Cena) would be meaningless.

Secondly, The Undertaker sucks.

I used to be a HUGE fan of his but I am really sick of this guy and I know I'm going to get hated for it but this guy is just a bore nowadays.

It's the same predictable thing every year, 2011, 2012, 2013 and now 2014.

Taker returns. Somebody say they're going to end the streak. They don't. The streak lives on.


It's just BS! Why are people getting so hyped for an awfully predictable match?

I really like Lesnar but the thought of him going into another WM match that he has no chance in winning makes me sick to my stomach. The WM season is the only time I enjoy nowadays but now my favourites (like Lesnar) are put into awfully predictable storylines with awfully predictable outcomes.

I'd much rather see Brock vs Sheamus, Brock vs Batista, Brock vs Orton, Brock vs Bryan, Brock vs The Shield...


There's only two reasons for Taker to still be wrestling at this point: Ego or Money.

Money: Obviously Taker comes in and takes a huge WM paycheck for doing one match.

Ego: Taker wants to walk out saying he's beat "the best of the best"


Taker should just retire. He's just a cancer nowadays.

He's taking young talents' spot. Sure he earned a WM spot but so did many others: HBK, Hogan, Flair...

Why aren't they coming back?

I'm ok with part timers like Brock, Rock, Hunter... coming back because they could be working with young talents.

Nowadays with Taker, every Taker mark start wet!ng his pants about who Taker's gonna face, if he's WORTH facing him and that no way they should beat Taker.

SMH.

Taker is a cancer to wrestling right now. His marks are even worst, especially the ones saying "The streak should never end".

Frankly, if the streak doesn't end, then all of those previous years Taker returning were pure BS and meaningless.



I hope Lesnar injures Taker to retirement.

 

[LODemolition]

The thought of that cancer The Undertaker winning the WWE title is pure BS!!

Not a fan of that situation either, but we all know the streak isn't ending.

I would love to see Lesnar win the title at EC, even if it does mean jobbing to Taker at WM. Like I said though, there's always the chance of Taker losing it back the very next night. Idk, we'll see.

I think the title match will be between Orton and Batista. anyway

 

[TheOneAndOnlyGOAT]

Not a fan of that situation either, but we all know the streak isn't ending.

I would love to see Lesnar win the title at EC, even if it does mean jobbing to Taker at WM. Like I said though, there's always the chance of Taker losing it back the very next night. Idk, we'll see.

I think the title match will be between Orton and Batista. anyway

Still hoping Bryan somehow will be competing for the WWE title at WrestleMania.

What about a triple threat with Bryan vs Orton vs Batista?

My dream scenario would be Lesnar winning the WWE title at EC and Bryan-Lesnar for the title.

I could really see this match as a 5 star match, and one of the greatest in the 21st century.

With Lesnar's intensity in the ring and Bryan's submission skills and with the right story, this could really be a David vs Goliath classic

 

[CrucifiedRaven]

Not a fan of that situation either, but we all know the streak isn't ending.

I would love to see Lesnar win the title at EC, even if it does mean jobbing to Taker at WM. Like I said though, there's always the chance of Taker losing it back the very next night. Idk, we'll see.

I think the title match will be between Orton and Batista. anyway

I don't like the idea of giving the Undertaker a 1day or even 1 month reign. It makes the entire 'Mania match pointless. If you're going to give him the title, just to have him lose it back immediately, all just so he can win at WrestleMania... then it is the wrong call. You either go all the way and have Lesnar beat the streak and continue on without a useless 1 day blip in his reign or you put the title into a different program. Personally, having 'Taker involved in the title picture is 100% unnecessary at this point anyways. I'd let him face Lesnar or Bryan in a completely separate program. Likely, Batista and one of Bryan, Orton or Lesnar will be involved in the WWE WHC match.

 

[LODemolition]

I'm not a fan of triple threats in the main event of WM. Maybe I'm just a traditionalist. I wouldn't count Bryan out of the title match at Mania. I could easily see the last 2 in the Rumble being Wyatt and Bryan. Wyatt orders Bryan to eliminate himself, only for Bryan to throw Wyatt over the top rope and reveal he was only using the Wyatt Family to help him win it, because he knew he couldn't win with the 3 of them ganging up on him.

If Bryan does win though, Orton has to lose the title at EC because we can't have Orton vs Bryan AGAIN. Lesnar vs Bryan? It's possible.

 

[TheOneAndOnlyGOAT]

Personally, having 'Taker involved in the title picture is 100% unnecessary at this point anyways. I'd let him face Lesnar or Bryan in a completely separate program. Likely, Batista and one of Bryan, Orton or Lesnar will be involved in the WWE WHC match.

Please keep Bryan away from Taker and his shovel.

SMH.

I'm sick of Taker burying my favourites. Bryan is my #1 guy right now. If Taker faces Bryan or beats him, I'll boo him when I go to WM30

 

[LODemolition]

I don't like the idea of giving the Undertaker a 1day or even 1 month reign. It makes the entire 'Mania match pointless. If you're going to give him the title, just to have him lose it back immediately, all just so he can win at WrestleMania... then it is the wrong call. You either go all the way and have Lesnar beat the streak and continue on without a useless 1 day blip in his reign or you put the title into a different program. Personally, having 'Taker involved in the title picture is 100% unnecessary at this point anyways. I'd let him face Lesnar or Bryan in a completely separate program. Likely, Batista and one of Bryan, Orton or Lesnar will be involved in the WWE WHC match.

While I agree with you, I think we're kidding ourselves if we say Taker will never be champ again before hanging up his boots. And when he does win the belt once again, it will be at a WrestleMania.

 

[CrucifiedRaven]

While I agree with you, I think we're kidding ourselves if we say Taker will never be champ again before hanging up his boots. And when he does win the belt once again, it will be at a WrestleMania.

The only way I see him ever winning the title again, is at WrestleMania and he retires as champion immediately after. Either at 'Mania or on RAW the next night. That would be a fitting end to his career, indeed. But I for sure don't see him actually going on to have a title reign.

 

[TheOneAndOnlyGOAT]

While I agree with you, I think we're kidding ourselves if we say Taker will never be champ again before hanging up his boots. And when he does win the belt once again, it will be at a WrestleMania.

Taker won't be champ before hanging up his boots.

If he decides to come back for one more full-time run, sure.

But if he stays a part timer, HELLL NO!

 

[CultOfPersonality]

I think the only way Lesnar goes into WM as champion is if he wins at EC and starts a programme with Batista. If he isn't champion going into WM, however, I think that his fued with Taker would need to start at EC, so what you've talked about earlier is one way to start it.

Personally feel like a Lesnar Batista match at Mania is something they're thinking of, especially with Lesnar saying he wants the title and with Batista coming back for RR - and Taker has asked for DB so I could probably see that happening with the Wyatts tied in as well

 

[zwbruno]

I don't think Lesnar will end up facing Taker at Mania, it feels too little too late. And a brutal match would be bad for Taker. With rumors abound, I, personally, think DBry will take on the streak. He can carry Taker with mat grappling and then have the one or two big spots. Also, I still think Kane is a double agent, so the interjecting Taker would be easy.

As for Lesnar, I could see him facing Ryback, which would be meh. Or Lesnar being the guy to team with Piper to face Cena and Hulk. I think that would absolutely would be best for business.

 

[Mongoose McQueen]

WOW! All this Undertaker hate all of a sudden, where's that coming from? lol. I want to see The Streak ended but only with John Cena involved. Brock Lesnar being a part time performer IMO does not need to end The Streak. John Cena could possibly go down as the greatest of all time if he achieves that.

 

[LODemolition]

Taker won't be champ before hanging up his boots.

If he decides to come back for one more full-time run, sure.

But if he stays a part timer, HELLL NO!

Full-time, part-time, it doesn't matter. They will give him the title one more time out of gratitude for his for his 20+ years of loyalty to the company.

If they did it for The Rock, you can bet your ass they're gonna do it for Taker.

 

[LODemolition]

Some rumors about them possibly wanting to book Sheamus as Taker's opponent.

I couldn't possibly be LESS interested in that.

 

[CultOfPersonality]

Some rumors about them possibly wanting to book Sheamus as Taker's opponent.

I couldn't possibly be LESS interested in that.

Sheamus is an interesting one because I can't see him getting a run at the WWE WHC title but at the same time I don't see the point in putting him in a midcard feud for the IC or US, so what do WWE do with him?

NOT put him against Taker - I agree here.

 

[L@RISANO]

I think this is stup!d for many reasons.

First, Lesnar only wrestles 3 times a year. Wasting one of his matches on a guy he already lost against and faced many times (Cena) would be meaningless.

Secondly, The Undertaker sucks.

I used to be a HUGE fan of his but I am really sick of this guy and I know I'm going to get hated for it but this guy is just a bore nowadays.

It's the same predictable thing every year, 2011, 2012, 2013 and now 2014.

Taker returns. Somebody say they're going to end the streak. They don't. The streak lives on.


It's just BS! Why are people getting so hyped for an awfully predictable match?

I really like Lesnar but the thought of him going into another WM match that he has no chance in winning makes me sick to my stomach. The WM season is the only time I enjoy nowadays but now my favourites (like Lesnar) are put into awfully predictable storylines with awfully predictable outcomes.

I'd much rather see Brock vs Sheamus, Brock vs Batista, Brock vs Orton, Brock vs Bryan, Brock vs The Shield...


There's only two reasons for Taker to still be wrestling at this point: Ego or Money.

Money: Obviously Taker comes in and takes a huge WM paycheck for doing one match.

Ego: Taker wants to walk out saying he's beat "the best of the best"


Taker should just retire. He's just a cancer nowadays.

He's taking young talents' spot. Sure he earned a WM spot but so did many others: HBK, Hogan, Flair...

Why aren't they coming back?

I'm ok with part timers like Brock, Rock, Hunter... coming back because they could be working with young talents.

Nowadays with Taker, every Taker mark start wet!ng his pants about who Taker's gonna face, if he's WORTH facing him and that no way they should beat Taker.

SMH.

Taker is a cancer to wrestling right now. His marks are even worst, especially the ones saying "The streak should never end".

Frankly, if the streak doesn't end, then all of those previous years Taker returning were pure BS and meaningless.



I hope Lesnar injures Taker to retirement.

WOW.
Don't really unserstand the hate in this post.

Is Taker really taking up someone's spot at Wrestlemania?
I am pretty sure the majority of Wrestling fans even beyond the WWE universe look forward to the spectacle of the Streak match.
Also, it is not like the match is crap. It is actually amongst the Best Matches each year(Not only at WM, but including every other match during the year).

Indeed, the Streak being broken is always unlikely, but since WM 23, the matches have been brilliant with a possible Streak being broken teased during the matches. To say Taker is a cancer is unreasonable to say the least, because I doubt anyone of the up-and-comers on the Current roster can steal the show in the ring like he does at WM each year.

 

[LODemolition]

Sheamus is an interesting one because I can't see him getting a run at the WWE WHC title but at the same time I don't see the point in putting him in a midcard feud for the IC or US, so what do WWE do with him?

NOT put him against Taker - I agree here.

Gotta disagree. Sheamus is a good option to feud with Langston for the IC Title, imo. The top 3 opponents for Langston would be 1. Henry 2. Sheamus and 3. Brodus (if they built him up properly)

These guys all match up great with Langston, physically.

 

[TheOneAndOnlyGOAT]

Full-time, part-time, it doesn't matter. They will give him the title one more time out of gratitude for his for his 20+ years of loyalty to the company.

If they did it for The Rock, you can bet your ass they're gonna do it for Taker.

Technically, Rock didn't became wwe champ.

He wasn't champ in a way of wwe letting him hold it and nobody knowing who will beat him for it.

He was just champ because WWE wanted Cena becoming new champ by defeating rock.


If Taker is going to win the title to lose it to someone and put him over, sure.

But I really have 0 interest in seeing taker as part time champ.


Also, WWE are already rewarding him by giving him a big fat 7 digits wrestlemania paycheck each year when he's sitting on his old fatasss for the rest of the year doing nothing lol.
Also, I think WM32 will be in Texas just so that Taker can retire in his hometown in front of 100K people.

What more does grandpa want?

 

[TheOneAndOnlyGOAT]

WOW.
Don't really unserstand the hate in this post.

Is Taker really taking up someone's spot at Wrestlemania?
I am pretty sure the majority of Wrestling fans even beyond the WWE universe look forward to the spectacle of the Streak match.
Also, it is not like the match is crap. It is actually amongst the Best Matches each year(Not only at WM, but including every other match during the year).

Indeed, the Streak being broken is always unlikely, but since WM 23, the matches have been brilliant with a possible Streak being broken teased during the matches. To say Taker is a cancer is unreasonable to say the least, because I doubt anyone of the up-and-comers on the Current roster can steal the show in the ring like he does at WM each year.

That's my point.

I find it stupid how every year, it's the same story in a taker match.

In his match with punk, punk carried him completely the entire match.

I wasn't "on the edge of my seat", I was just watching the match with 0 emotion, seeing the crowd going crazy at every pinfall was sickening, I'm like : "WTF ARE YOU GUYS DOING".

It's like people who go the movies, know how a movie will end yet they start acting like /!tches exaggerating at every thing that happen yet they know how it will end.


The Lesnar Taker match will be great (mostly because of Lesnar) but I just don't want to see taker again for another year.

He's becoming like flair and Hogan, never knowing when to stop.


This year is the milestone WMXXX, he'll be 22-0, perfect way to retire, WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT TAKER?

 

[kadroan]

This thread is on the assumption that Lesnar is indeed going to wrestle taker at mania.

We all saw on Raw Lesnar says he doesn't need to enter the Royal Rumble to get a Title shot

So Lesnar said on Raw he doesn't need to enter the rumble so i think he's gonna have a match against Henry at Royal Rumble and then the next night on raw he will challenge John Cena for the Title (yes cena beats orton at RR) at Elimination Chamber to which of course Cena accepts, So at Elimination Chamber Cena gets a beat down and just as Lesnar is about to finish off cena the lights go out and a huge gong sounds around the arena and brock gets distracted and when the lights come back on Cena hits an AA on Lesnar and Cena picks up the victory.

Next night on Raw Lesnar challenges Taker to a match at Wrestlemania and says he's the one who's going to break the streak as Taker cost him the title.

Who wins?
You decide?
So do you think WWE could go down this route to build towards Taker vs Brock. seems the most logical choice imo.

Interesting idea. I just don't see why Taker would go after Brock though. They have no storyline ties. If anything Taker would go after The Shield. I just don't see how he could tied to Lesnar.

 

[L@RISANO]

That's my point.

I find it stupid how every year, it's the same story in a taker match.

In his match with punk, punk carried him completely the entire match.

I wasn't "on the edge of my seat", I was just watching the match with 0 emotion, seeing the crowd going crazy at every pinfall was sickening, I'm like : "WTF ARE YOU GUYS DOING".

It's like people who go the movies, know how a movie will end yet they start acting like /!tches exaggerating at every thing that happen yet they know how it will end.


The Lesnar Taker match will be great (mostly because of Lesnar) but I just don't want to see taker again for another year.

He's becoming like flair and Hogan, never knowing when to stop.


This year is the milestone WMXXX, he'll be 22-0, perfect way to retire, WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT TAKER?

From what I read and how I understand the situation. I believe that Undertaker would probably quickly enough at any time. It is actually WWE who see potential in keeping the Streak going so long as Taker can make it each year. There is nothing set in stone with Taker at all. It does not seem in anyway that he is begging for the Streak to go on or to wrestle once a year. The WWE wants him to do the Special Mania match because it is an attraction and your comment about people hanging on to every near fall proves their thinking is right with regards to the Streak match.
Yes, we know it will result in Taker winning but it is the Story that is told and the fact that the matches are great that sells it to the audience and thats what counts for it to happen yearly. Nothing more.