Jack-Hammer
YOU WILL RESPECT MY AUTHORITAH!!!!
I wouldn't hold my breath on this happening. According to a report that was put out yesterday, and this is just a report so there's no telling if it's totally legit, is that WWE has an idea they want to do IF The Rock returns to work WM XXX next year. IF, IF, IF he does, then there's talk of having him feud with Brock Lesnar and using their 2002 feud as a background for building the match. If that happens, then there's talk of putting Taker against Ryback. As with many other past opponents, there's talk & speculation about Ryback being "the one" to end the streak. There was talk of it being CM Punk last year and there were talks of it being Triple H the past couple of years due to the question of Taker's health going forward.
I don't think it's going to go down this way, that is if all the various reports that've been put out in regards to The Rock post WM 29 are accurate. For one, The Rock's injuries had everyone from fans to wrestling insiders to Hollywood heavyweights giving their opinions on whether or not he should wrestle. Probably the one that sticks out the most is from director Michael Bay when he said, and I agree, that The Rock has too much to lose to risk wrestling again. His movie career is increasingly lucrative and the movies he's starred in over the past 2 years have made over $2.25 billion worldwide. A few months back, it was reported that WWE contacted the company responsible for making their merchandise and told it not to produce any new Rock stuff for 2014. WWE's ALWAYS had new Rock merchandise to go along with his returns so, if the report's true, then it's a strong indicator that he won't be back at WM XXX as a wrestler. A few days after SummerSlam, another report came out stating that the planned finish to Punk vs. Lesnar was changed a few days before the match. This report alleges that Taker contacted WWE officials during this time period and informed them that he would compete at WM XXX, prompting officials to change the finish of Punk vs. Lesnar, allegedly, due to not wanting Lesnar going into WM XXX with a 2-3 ppv record since his return.
When it comes down to dollars & cents, there's going to be a lot more money to be made off the streak at WM XXX if Taker goes up against a big name, marquee opponent. Unless a lot changes between now and the night after the Royal Rumble next year, that big name, marquee opponent won't be Ryback. Ryback is someone who, in my opinion, gets a good deal of undeserved hate. I don't believe he'll ever be the "face" of WWE or anything like that, but Ryback's become a pretty solid talker and his matches are often highly entertaining, especially now that they've done away with the more Goldberg-esque aspects of his character. When it comes to the streak matches, however, WWE needs someone who is a genuinely major, top level name to help sell the match. It's a standard that's been set by the WM matches with HBK, Triple H & CM Punk. Going from them to Ryback without a MASSIVE surge in Ryback's star power between now and WM will be a big step down for Taker's WM match. IF it does turn out to be Taker vs. Ryback, however, I highly doubt Ryback goes over unless Taker agrees to let it happen. Taker is damn near universally respected in pro wrestling, as well he should be, because he conducts himself like a pro is supposed to and gives it his best effort even if he's been handed a big, steamy, slimy pile of diarrhea to work with. If the streak ever comes to an end with Taker losing, I firmly believe that he'll decide who ends it because that's how much stroke he's got in WWE.
Taker vs. Lesnar is a guaranteed money match and one in which it'll be extremely easy to sell. Brock Lesnar's a legit badass, like him or hate him, the guy's a friggin' beast. By the time WM XXX comes about, Taker will officially be 49 years old and we all know how the wear & tear of the business has caught up with him the past 4 or 5 years. Lesnar is also probably the only major name in WWE the past 20 years or so who can claim to have ultimately gotten the best of Taker. They had a small handful of very physical matches back in late 2002. Their first match was at Unforgiven ended in a double DQ. Their next match was a classic HIAC match at No Mercy in which Lesnar scored a clean win over Taker and I think they had one more match on SD!, which was no DQ, with Lesnar getting the win due to interference from Heyman. If they build on their past feud coupling it with Lesnar's legitimacy and the common knowledge that Taker simply isn't what he used to be, they'll have no problem hyping him as the streak's biggest threat.
I don't think it's going to go down this way, that is if all the various reports that've been put out in regards to The Rock post WM 29 are accurate. For one, The Rock's injuries had everyone from fans to wrestling insiders to Hollywood heavyweights giving their opinions on whether or not he should wrestle. Probably the one that sticks out the most is from director Michael Bay when he said, and I agree, that The Rock has too much to lose to risk wrestling again. His movie career is increasingly lucrative and the movies he's starred in over the past 2 years have made over $2.25 billion worldwide. A few months back, it was reported that WWE contacted the company responsible for making their merchandise and told it not to produce any new Rock stuff for 2014. WWE's ALWAYS had new Rock merchandise to go along with his returns so, if the report's true, then it's a strong indicator that he won't be back at WM XXX as a wrestler. A few days after SummerSlam, another report came out stating that the planned finish to Punk vs. Lesnar was changed a few days before the match. This report alleges that Taker contacted WWE officials during this time period and informed them that he would compete at WM XXX, prompting officials to change the finish of Punk vs. Lesnar, allegedly, due to not wanting Lesnar going into WM XXX with a 2-3 ppv record since his return.
When it comes down to dollars & cents, there's going to be a lot more money to be made off the streak at WM XXX if Taker goes up against a big name, marquee opponent. Unless a lot changes between now and the night after the Royal Rumble next year, that big name, marquee opponent won't be Ryback. Ryback is someone who, in my opinion, gets a good deal of undeserved hate. I don't believe he'll ever be the "face" of WWE or anything like that, but Ryback's become a pretty solid talker and his matches are often highly entertaining, especially now that they've done away with the more Goldberg-esque aspects of his character. When it comes to the streak matches, however, WWE needs someone who is a genuinely major, top level name to help sell the match. It's a standard that's been set by the WM matches with HBK, Triple H & CM Punk. Going from them to Ryback without a MASSIVE surge in Ryback's star power between now and WM will be a big step down for Taker's WM match. IF it does turn out to be Taker vs. Ryback, however, I highly doubt Ryback goes over unless Taker agrees to let it happen. Taker is damn near universally respected in pro wrestling, as well he should be, because he conducts himself like a pro is supposed to and gives it his best effort even if he's been handed a big, steamy, slimy pile of diarrhea to work with. If the streak ever comes to an end with Taker losing, I firmly believe that he'll decide who ends it because that's how much stroke he's got in WWE.
Taker vs. Lesnar is a guaranteed money match and one in which it'll be extremely easy to sell. Brock Lesnar's a legit badass, like him or hate him, the guy's a friggin' beast. By the time WM XXX comes about, Taker will officially be 49 years old and we all know how the wear & tear of the business has caught up with him the past 4 or 5 years. Lesnar is also probably the only major name in WWE the past 20 years or so who can claim to have ultimately gotten the best of Taker. They had a small handful of very physical matches back in late 2002. Their first match was at Unforgiven ended in a double DQ. Their next match was a classic HIAC match at No Mercy in which Lesnar scored a clean win over Taker and I think they had one more match on SD!, which was no DQ, with Lesnar getting the win due to interference from Heyman. If they build on their past feud coupling it with Lesnar's legitimacy and the common knowledge that Taker simply isn't what he used to be, they'll have no problem hyping him as the streak's biggest threat.