I can't say it any better than Zevon zion. I too have watched the last three RAWs and last night's Raw completely lost me. During the Orton match i started to fall asleep. Those Nexus guys are like a bunch of Brooklyn Brawlers. I don't understand why Orton would have trouble whooping them all at once. I have no idea who is feuding. Cena vs the Miz is the title match at WM and there is no feud besides for a belt. There is nothing else there. The Miz should be on Jersey Shore or something not on a wrestling program.
There is no believable wrestling bone in his body. It's funny, people come one here hypocritically trashing everything TNA is doing because they are lost watching it. They are like me, a casual Raw fan, and they don't get how anything advances storylines. They're not REALLY into it, the wrestlers they have little to no interest in no matter how talented, and Bischoff/Hogan/Russo are the three biggest threats ever in the history of marks beloved WWE. That's why they go all apeshit calling for the demise of this trio. Because they're marks. Marks let WWE be the exception and hypocritically call out TNA for doing the 'exact same things' WWE does. That's a definition of a mark. Marks also don't get that they are marks, same goes for smarks. They think they are one of the few who bypasses that labeling. Anyway, WWE can program 3 wrestling matches into its show and that is fine because it's 'setting things up' but when TNA does it it's not to 'set things up' but it's done for no reason but to 'lamely attack WWE.' As if all the feuds in WWE aren't lame, one where Cena and Miz have no chemistry, one where Orton squashes a bunch of no names, one where Taker and Trips is a predictable one with little to no reason, one where The Rock shows up once and a while like Hogan does and has little to no direction, one where a legend like Jerry Lawler has trouble with a big menancing ****** in Jack Swagger and can't get his hands on another lowly commentator, and then who knows what else is going on?? I don't. I'm so sick of such biased argumentation. If you like what WWE is doing and turn around and not like what TNA is doing then it has nothing to do with TNA's product sucking and WWE's being amazing. It has to do with you are WWE mark and you do not want to admit it. Everyone here trashing TNA believes they are not marks, they believe they have cred because they profess that they are not marks. They believe they are right and people who call them out are wrong because there are more of them than there are of fans standing up for TNA.
3 matches, an old guy squashes a new guy, boring segments, fan confusion about feuds, weakest WM card in WWE history, biggest feud being a yawner between Taker and Trips (we all know who is gonna win and we could give two shits) and without The Rock i'm not watching and the old audience isn't either. TNA might not be increasing their ratings consistently but neither has WWE therefore both promotion's shows over the past few years have been equally successful/unsuccessful. WWE marks, whether you realize yet what you are or not, it's time to stop calling the pot black
There is no believable wrestling bone in his body. It's funny, people come one here hypocritically trashing everything TNA is doing because they are lost watching it. They are like me, a casual Raw fan, and they don't get how anything advances storylines. They're not REALLY into it, the wrestlers they have little to no interest in no matter how talented, and Bischoff/Hogan/Russo are the three biggest threats ever in the history of marks beloved WWE. That's why they go all apeshit calling for the demise of this trio. Because they're marks. Marks let WWE be the exception and hypocritically call out TNA for doing the 'exact same things' WWE does. That's a definition of a mark. Marks also don't get that they are marks, same goes for smarks. They think they are one of the few who bypasses that labeling. Anyway, WWE can program 3 wrestling matches into its show and that is fine because it's 'setting things up' but when TNA does it it's not to 'set things up' but it's done for no reason but to 'lamely attack WWE.' As if all the feuds in WWE aren't lame, one where Cena and Miz have no chemistry, one where Orton squashes a bunch of no names, one where Taker and Trips is a predictable one with little to no reason, one where The Rock shows up once and a while like Hogan does and has little to no direction, one where a legend like Jerry Lawler has trouble with a big menancing ****** in Jack Swagger and can't get his hands on another lowly commentator, and then who knows what else is going on?? I don't. I'm so sick of such biased argumentation. If you like what WWE is doing and turn around and not like what TNA is doing then it has nothing to do with TNA's product sucking and WWE's being amazing. It has to do with you are WWE mark and you do not want to admit it. Everyone here trashing TNA believes they are not marks, they believe they have cred because they profess that they are not marks. They believe they are right and people who call them out are wrong because there are more of them than there are of fans standing up for TNA.
3 matches, an old guy squashes a new guy, boring segments, fan confusion about feuds, weakest WM card in WWE history, biggest feud being a yawner between Taker and Trips (we all know who is gonna win and we could give two shits) and without The Rock i'm not watching and the old audience isn't either. TNA might not be increasing their ratings consistently but neither has WWE therefore both promotion's shows over the past few years have been equally successful/unsuccessful. WWE marks, whether you realize yet what you are or not, it's time to stop calling the pot black