Hyorinmaru
Sit Upon The Frozen Heavens
Just tell them Nash would fuck up his leg walking to the ring thus being easy prey for the sharpshooter
The WrestleZone Tournament Has Begun
- Thread starter Uncle Sam
- Start date
DirtyJosé
Best angle of all: retirement
Fuck Big Lazy. Bring your nWo arguments. Bring your WM11 arguments. I simply don't care. I've never found him to be an enjoyable performer, end of story.
I remember now how to procede in this shit: post only when I think a tie may occur. If I wanted listen to why stats, numbers, and other shit like that are the be-all, end-all, inflexible measure of a performer's worth and talent, I'd post more in the sports section.
I remember now how to procede in this shit: post only when I think a tie may occur. If I wanted listen to why stats, numbers, and other shit like that are the be-all, end-all, inflexible measure of a performer's worth and talent, I'd post more in the sports section.
Hyorinmaru
Sit Upon The Frozen Heavens
Don't be suprised if someone brings it up anyway.
DirtyJosé
Best angle of all: retirement
Good for them. They aren't me, and I'm really not interested into getting sucked into someone else's reasoning. I don't love wrestling for stats. I don't love wrestlers simply because of their accomplishments. I like what I like, and until the gimmick round starts, that's reason enough to vote how I please.
And that one year of dominance was far greater then anything Eddie Guerrero ever did.
Hyorinmaru
Sit Upon The Frozen Heavens
Sad but true
DirtyJosé
Best angle of all: retirement
First of all, I was under the impression for some reason (probably some silly assumption on my part) that the criteria for voting changed slightly around that time.
Secondly, in the spirit of the tournament, I will allow a match gimmick to influence my vote for the round. I mean, since the time has been taken to make one for the match, I figure I should play nice.
Big Nick Dudley
Nick
DirtyJosé;2904570 said:
Exactly. If everyone decided to vote, throughout the entire tournament, on something along the lines of who drew the most money, it wouldn't be much fun.
Nate DaMac
Fuck erbody but me
I like how everyone has their own criteria. If not, Hogan would win every year.
In the finals, I will be voting based solely on shoe size.
In the finals, I will be voting based solely on shoe size.
I'm holding you to this.
Nate DaMac
Fuck erbody but me
Fuck. It's going to take some stalkerish tactics to figure out shoe sizes.
Nate DaMac
Fuck erbody but me
I bet Jim Ross would know.
It doesn't have to. There is no criteria for voting, your criteria is what you make it.DirtyJosé;2904570 said:
I understand what you are saying, it just seems strange to me that you are simply going to go with the wrestler you like the best, and then suddenly change to an analytic view of voting.
DirtyJosé
Best angle of all: retirement
Well, it's not going to be totally switched to based only on the gimmick, I'm just going to let it factor into my consideration.
Joe's Gonna Kill You
The Hunt is On
More Matches are going up!
FunKay the Inevitable
People Like Me, We Don't Play
I voted for Jerry Lawler. Why? Because I wanted to throw him a bone.
Mr. Artistic guy
Better Off This Way
Hmmmm just noticed a bit of an issue with the voting. Well it states that you can pretty much use any criteria you deem appropriate to pick a winner, whilst I find this the best aspect of the tournament as it opens things up to interpretation it pretty much means people can find any excuse to vote on personal preference. Whilst that is fair game, if someone is voting on personal preference and trying to twist ideas just for a weak reason to vote for their favourites that's pretty poor.
Obviously it's impossible to prevent people from doing this but it does mean people may end up voting against someone who they know full well is better and they they just don't like. It can't really be helped but it is semi-frustrating, people ought not vote against someone purely because they don't like them, that's terrible use of the free criteria idea.
Sorry, mini-vent.
Obviously it's impossible to prevent people from doing this but it does mean people may end up voting against someone who they know full well is better and they they just don't like. It can't really be helped but it is semi-frustrating, people ought not vote against someone purely because they don't like them, that's terrible use of the free criteria idea.
Sorry, mini-vent.
Big Nick Dudley
Nick
And that's why you're able to tell that person he's wrong, and vote the other way.
TheOneBigWill
[This Space for Rent]
Anyone who is voting for Batista over the Ultimate Warrior needs to make sure they vote Batista over Hulk Hogan, because that is basically what they'd have to be stupid enough to believe in voting. (unless they were solely voting on hating Warrior - then that's understandable)
Warrior is shit to people outside of the ring. But in his time, inside the ring, regardless of talent or otherwise; he was the second greatest draw the Company had during the Hogan era - including a clean win over Hogan. For Sly of all people to vote against Warrior, it's making me believe someone hacked his account.
Warrior is shit to people outside of the ring. But in his time, inside the ring, regardless of talent or otherwise; he was the second greatest draw the Company had during the Hogan era - including a clean win over Hogan. For Sly of all people to vote against Warrior, it's making me believe someone hacked his account.
