Yes, there's a difference.
For almost two decades, we've been told about how MMArk has earned the respect of every person he's ever come in contact with or entertained. We've been told about how there's never been a more respected man ever in professional wrestling and how he's a leader behind the curtain. However, is this really the truth of the matter? Or are people simply too scared to tell the truth?
For almost two decades, The Undertaker's on screen persona is one that relied on fear and intimidation to win his fights for him. Whether it be as the Deadman or the American Badass, Taker has never failed to intimidate. He's just a scary looking dude with scary words and scary tactics. Is this how he is backstage? Is the much whispered of "wrestler's court"and Taker's ability to "solve problems" a result of people being too afraid to stand up to this big tough biker? Is Taker in fact so badass, so scary, so intimidating that fear has muted his critics and created a false illusion of respect surrounding him?
For almost two decades, we've been told about how MMArk has earned the respect of every person he's ever come in contact with or entertained. We've been told about how there's never been a more respected man ever in professional wrestling and how he's a leader behind the curtain. However, is this really the truth of the matter? Or are people simply too scared to tell the truth?
For almost two decades, The Undertaker's on screen persona is one that relied on fear and intimidation to win his fights for him. Whether it be as the Deadman or the American Badass, Taker has never failed to intimidate. He's just a scary looking dude with scary words and scary tactics. Is this how he is backstage? Is the much whispered of "wrestler's court"and Taker's ability to "solve problems" a result of people being too afraid to stand up to this big tough biker? Is Taker in fact so badass, so scary, so intimidating that fear has muted his critics and created a false illusion of respect surrounding him?