For now, I'm too hungover to fully process this, but I'll make a few relevant points, I suppose.
Criticism
By all means, be more critical. But you'd be surprised at the amount of internal criticism that occurs as we move through the creative process. It's not all of us sitting around telling each other our shit is great, we address relevant problems on our own. I'm sure the more criticism we got, the better it'd come out in the end, but as it stands I don't believe there are glaring holes in the product generated by lack of criticism.
I don't really agree that anyone not on your short list is "contributing suck", either. I understand why you wrote that, and don't think you really mean it like that, but still. Not everyone is interested in criticizing every show and RP. Some people just want to show up and do their character. Everest is a name that comes to mind. And a brilliant RPer like Ech who also does good feedback when he does do it is very much contributing positively to the fed.
Blade
Can't speak on it since we never co-existed on creative, but I worry you're letting your personal feelings obfuscate the truth. Even without any WZCW incidents, it's clear who you prefer between Blade and Coco. Blade deserves thanks for, at the bare minimum, putting in the time and effort on creative. Reading every RP every round, deciding a winner, writing matches, and participating in the overall planning process is nearly a part-time job in and of itself.
Deadlines
I think those that have been around for a few rounds understand that, with seven people leading seven lives in different time zones, there isn't really a "deadline" on shows other than vaguely the weekend. As long as that's kept in mind I think people shouldn't be disappointed.
Favoritism
Hey, wait, can I get in on this? Where's my politicking-based uber-push, huh?
Kidding aside, your criticism of Falkon goes too far, JGlass. I understand you structure arguments with the intent of making people uncomfortable, but this is too much. Falkon's RPs on the road to Kingdom Come have all been top notch and worthy of a world champion. You're entirely entitled to your opinion that they aren't that great, but seven people deciding that they're worth a championship isn't a conspiracy, it's just creative's collective opinion. I can personally tell you with all honesty that there's never been any sort of politicking to keep the belt on Kurtesy in my time on creative. He just gets the votes when he needs them, like everyone else.
Dave won his right to make the poster by a vote of creative. It was a multi-way tie that I broke because I liked Dave's work and knew he was reliable, not because he was on creative. And hey, I wasn't on the poster, man. How does that factor into your creative favoritism argument? People got on the poster because they were important to KC.
Regarding Holmes/Dave vs Sabs/Sax, I think to claim that Sax/Sabs had a better feud than Holmes/Dave is just a bit absurd. You're two midcarders with a self-constructed feud that is more tongue-in-cheek than anything. It's amusing, but Holmes/Dave is powerful. Sab/Sax was good, but not better than the Holmes/Dave epic. It deserved everything it got, and so did Sax/Sabs.
Creative "Transparency"
I can explain to you now why anyone loses in WZCW. A majority of creative voted against you. There you go. It wouldn't be possible to send one PM explaining every creative members motive for doing so - it would require one from everyone to explain it, making this proposal an even more monumental task. It's just not feasible with the current workload.
If you're interested in what makes me want to vote for your piece, it's generally being interesting and developing your character, while incorporating the specific circumstances as best as possible, i.e. addressing your opponent. I don't really mind any particular style. I think on Aftershock a Q&A RP can get you places, and I've seen them done creatively. But I generally lean toward interesting character development. I'd say the pinnacle of RPs at KC for me were Showtime's two pieces. That's a great standard to aspire to.
Overall JGlass, I think you make fair points and I appreciate someone keeping us honest. But I think there's a bit of self-aggrandizing here and no little amount of undue criticism, especially of Falkon. Your thoughts are well-appreciated and considered, but I'd think more highly of them without attacking people who don't deserve it.
Criticism
By all means, be more critical. But you'd be surprised at the amount of internal criticism that occurs as we move through the creative process. It's not all of us sitting around telling each other our shit is great, we address relevant problems on our own. I'm sure the more criticism we got, the better it'd come out in the end, but as it stands I don't believe there are glaring holes in the product generated by lack of criticism.
I don't really agree that anyone not on your short list is "contributing suck", either. I understand why you wrote that, and don't think you really mean it like that, but still. Not everyone is interested in criticizing every show and RP. Some people just want to show up and do their character. Everest is a name that comes to mind. And a brilliant RPer like Ech who also does good feedback when he does do it is very much contributing positively to the fed.
Blade
Can't speak on it since we never co-existed on creative, but I worry you're letting your personal feelings obfuscate the truth. Even without any WZCW incidents, it's clear who you prefer between Blade and Coco. Blade deserves thanks for, at the bare minimum, putting in the time and effort on creative. Reading every RP every round, deciding a winner, writing matches, and participating in the overall planning process is nearly a part-time job in and of itself.
Deadlines
I think those that have been around for a few rounds understand that, with seven people leading seven lives in different time zones, there isn't really a "deadline" on shows other than vaguely the weekend. As long as that's kept in mind I think people shouldn't be disappointed.
Favoritism
Hey, wait, can I get in on this? Where's my politicking-based uber-push, huh?
Kidding aside, your criticism of Falkon goes too far, JGlass. I understand you structure arguments with the intent of making people uncomfortable, but this is too much. Falkon's RPs on the road to Kingdom Come have all been top notch and worthy of a world champion. You're entirely entitled to your opinion that they aren't that great, but seven people deciding that they're worth a championship isn't a conspiracy, it's just creative's collective opinion. I can personally tell you with all honesty that there's never been any sort of politicking to keep the belt on Kurtesy in my time on creative. He just gets the votes when he needs them, like everyone else.
Dave won his right to make the poster by a vote of creative. It was a multi-way tie that I broke because I liked Dave's work and knew he was reliable, not because he was on creative. And hey, I wasn't on the poster, man. How does that factor into your creative favoritism argument? People got on the poster because they were important to KC.
Regarding Holmes/Dave vs Sabs/Sax, I think to claim that Sax/Sabs had a better feud than Holmes/Dave is just a bit absurd. You're two midcarders with a self-constructed feud that is more tongue-in-cheek than anything. It's amusing, but Holmes/Dave is powerful. Sab/Sax was good, but not better than the Holmes/Dave epic. It deserved everything it got, and so did Sax/Sabs.
Creative "Transparency"
I can explain to you now why anyone loses in WZCW. A majority of creative voted against you. There you go. It wouldn't be possible to send one PM explaining every creative members motive for doing so - it would require one from everyone to explain it, making this proposal an even more monumental task. It's just not feasible with the current workload.
If you're interested in what makes me want to vote for your piece, it's generally being interesting and developing your character, while incorporating the specific circumstances as best as possible, i.e. addressing your opponent. I don't really mind any particular style. I think on Aftershock a Q&A RP can get you places, and I've seen them done creatively. But I generally lean toward interesting character development. I'd say the pinnacle of RPs at KC for me were Showtime's two pieces. That's a great standard to aspire to.
Overall JGlass, I think you make fair points and I appreciate someone keeping us honest. But I think there's a bit of self-aggrandizing here and no little amount of undue criticism, especially of Falkon. Your thoughts are well-appreciated and considered, but I'd think more highly of them without attacking people who don't deserve it.