Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The Knicks go into San Antonio and defeat the Spurs despite Carmelo going 3-12 from the field and only scoring 9 points. NY is now 6-0 and Mike Woodson has gotten them to play great on both ends of the court. They are the biggest surprise of the early NBA season.
There's really only one logical explanation for their play thus far this season:
![]()
This also reminded me that 2012 is the first time that the AL and NL Cy Young award winners faced off during the season.Couple little observations/facts regarding the MVPs. First time MVPs played against each other in the World Series since 1988. Both MVPs won the batting title. I can't tell you the last time that happened but it hasn't happened since I started watching baseball in the mid 80s.
In the NFL a player running to the end zone with the ball only has to barely cross the line with the ball even if no part of his body makes it in the end zone to be credited with a touchdown. If a receiver catches the ball while already in the end zone he has to get both feet on the ground in the end zone to be credited with a touchdown. I don't get it.
If a receiver doesn't get both feet down when he's not in the end zone it doesn't count as a completion, why would it be any different in the end zone?
because he has possession of the ball already. A reception is not made until the ball is controlled and either 2 feet or one body part hit the ground. And he needs to maintain control of the football.I'm just wondering why someone running to the end zone doesn't have to get any part of his body in there at all but that's not good enough for someone who is already in the end zone.
Did you know Manziel lost 2 games, and was the main reason they lost those games? I mean I did just link 3 games in my post. The 2 losses, one of which he threw for 250 yards with 3 picks and didn't run for shit. But no, that's an amazing game and the reason he won the Heisman.The bitterness is strong with this one, I see. Both were more than deserving, and to say otherwise is insulting to Manziel.
Did you know Manziel lost 2 games, and was the main reason they lost those games? I mean I did just link 3 games in my post. The 2 losses, one of which he threw for 250 yards with 3 picks and didn't run for shit. But no, that's an amazing game and the reason he won the Heisman.
And he is a man of character (which the Heisman does take into consideration), regardless of his arrest.
If he wasn't a freshman, he wouldn't have won. They would have given it to Klein. The anti-defense bias is beyond pathetic.
Clearly not, since it didn't hurt Manziel AT ALL. And Kleins bad game was better then Manziels.That said, I'm shocked Klein came in third. He was seen as the best quarterback in football... Could one game really have cost him that much?