SlyFox, great to see you on here. It gives me a chance to be right again.
That'd be an amazing feat, considering it's yet to happen.
If aspects of matches such as selling, psychology, etc is so important, THAT is why Hogan vs Warrior was off the list. And why it doesn't deserve a vote in my book. Don't get me wrong - they told a story of the two most popular, dominating goliaths in wrestling squaring off, and Hogan and Warrior did sort of "work the crowd."
SORT of work the crowd? Are you kidding me? The workrate in that match was phenomenal. They had those fans emotions tied into a knot all match long.
But ring psychology? Where was that present? I don't think either of these guys knows what that means.
Ring psychology is more than about limb psychology. It's about proper flow to a match, the right moves at the right time, how to increase the suspense of belief...all while doing it in a logical realistic way. They very much did that.
Is RVD / Lynn is just a "spot fest" then Hogan / Warrior is power move to rest hold to power move.
But...exactly. That was the whole point. It was the two men who were the strongest in the world, the two immovable objects going at it. It was the classic experienced veteran against the upcomer. It was Hogan's "Ultimate Challenge". Of course they use power moves and holds. What else did you want them to use? But, all of their spots made sense. You don't look at many moments in the match and go, "What the hell is the purpose of that?".
RVD/Lynn I'm constantly thinking...that was the most illogical and unrealistic sequence I've never seen in a fight. When I watch Hogan vs. Warrior, everything they do is believable.
And I wasn't aware cupping one's ear, flexing artificial muscles, and pounding one's chest qualified as "psychology."
No, it's called working the crowd.
And selling? These aren't two of the best "sellers" in wrestling history either. Now I don't 100% blame them, since they are asked to portray themselves as superheroes, but Hogan doesn't sell pain as much as he looks tired.
Hogan looks like he takes a beating in most matches. He looks like he gets worn out by his opponent and takes a hell of whipping.
Not sure where you get that from.
And to be honest, with the noted exception of the "test of strength" (which was a great point you made) the story wasn't told in the ring.
Yes it was.
Talk about an overhyped match.
It was one of the biggest Wrestlemania matches in history. How is that overhyped?
At a time in WWE where a) major main events were almost ALWAYS face vs heel, and b) The WWF and Intercontinental titles were kept separate, it was above all else just amazing that the match was HAPPENING. NOT what HAPPENED in the match.
The fact this was a face vs. face match and drew the response it did should tell you just how great of a matchup, and match, that this was. And, these guys surely did not disappoint in the ring.
Do you really think those fans would have cared if that match had been bad? Do you think that after 20+ minutes, if the match would have been awful, the fans would have been into it MORE than they were to start the match? Of course not.
And I don't credit Hogan or Warrior with that.
Well, this statement is plain ridiculous. Of course you credit Hogan and Warrior for that. They are the ones who drew the interest in the first place.