Stupid Spam Rules | Page 8 | WrestleZone Forums

Stupid Spam Rules

Yeah, because when nobody was posting at all that was much better:rolleyes:

Seriously get over it, if you want "quality posts" then make "quality posts", instead of hiding in here and pissing and moaning about the new spam rules

most action i've seen this forum get in quite some time..
 
Since when have I been hiding in here?

You're absolutely right though. That complete lack of advertising/support from the main site was indeed hurting things.
 
Yeah, because when nobody was posting at all that was much better:rolleyes:

Seriously get over it, if you want "quality posts" then make "quality posts", instead of hiding in here and pissing and moaning about the new spam rules

Yessssssssss.

And I hate this whole "red rep" bad posts thing. Seriously, if you hate it that much skip to the next post and try not to discourage some new poster.

Flames Out
Dragon
 
Yeah the red rep thing is stupid. People that make bad posts aren't going to give a damn what their rep is. Most good posters don't anyway.
 
I don't so much have an issue with the rules as much as the idiocy of the sounding of some poster. Is it that hard to type with grammar and punctution?
 
Yeah, because when nobody was posting at all that was much better:rolleyes:

Seriously get over it, if you want "quality posts" then make "quality posts", instead of hiding in here and pissing and moaning about the new spam rules

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Klunder...... hiding in the Bar Room? I've heard it all now.
 
He's bitching because he, like many others, think that the new spam rules are hurting the quality of posts here a lot and that it was done simply to boost post count and site hits with very little if any true consideration for the quality of the forums.

Wait, so have the spam rules taken place already?
 
I have Pm'ed NSL about this, but i thought I would say it here as well. If you have to red rep, so called "spammy" replies Make sure you say why you red repped in the comment. Because if you don't there is no piont doing it.
 
I love how they let everyone know about it last week.

So that might explain why I've seen so many shitty posts as of late.

It still ain't going to make me change my posting style. I'm a living proof that I can find the flaws in Slyfox's way, just by simply posting.
 
Are you done bitching yet?

No.

I still have no idea what he's bitching about here.

It started as a rant against the new spam rules, and has become a complaint about the idiocy in general that's happening around here.

He's bitching because he, like many others, think that the new spam rules are hurting the quality of posts here a lot and that it was done simply to boost post count and site hits with very little if any true consideration for the quality of the forums.

More thought out than anything I would've said, but yes. Basically, WZ has turned to shit, and I'm starting to not see the point in coming here at all...

And he, like many others, don't seem to realize the major difference in the amount of posting we've had over the last couple of weeks, and he also doesn't understand the difference between length of a post and quality of a post.

We've covered this, and yes, I do know the difference. But, a "quality post" doesn't always lead to "quality discussion".

For example:

I bet NightShiftLegend considers that a spam post.

Yes. Yes I did.

Do you plan on making a thread on what counts as spam and what does not? What you posted is, indeed, a non-spam post. However, it is one out of only a few short posts that are not spam even in its most lenient sense.

I will agree with Justin, that Sly has made it clear what he thinks is spam, and not spam, but I still don't agree. I don't see myself being in the minority either here...

More posts doesn't mean it makes the forums better.

Exactly. It makes me wish I had an ice-pick lodged in my forehead.

Agreed. But more posts lead to more quality posts, which DOES make forums better.

I haven't seen this happen yet. If it does, I'll lay off, but my opinion won't be changed.

Exactly, 1 is only one sentence, but I would not consider it spam. there is a clear difference between 1 and 2. 3 is the way WrestleZone users used to understand a non spam post as being.

How long did it take you to type Post 3? 30 seconds? Maybe 40? Are their lives so busy, that they can't form a single thought?

NSL 4 Bitch Wing.

I'm not breaking any rules. I'm bitching about a rule, and have been civil in doing so.

I read it, and I've read a lot of other ones before it. My problem/issue with the new rules is very simple: we all got here under the old rules and we did pretty well. Why should the new group get different treatment? The attendance goes down in the fall because nothing is going on in wrestling. It picked up for the Rumble as it always does. We all learned to follow the old spam rules. Why can't they?

:thumbsup:

Well why change any rule then lol? Back in 06 people would get permabanned, none of that one week stuff, they'd have crazy sigs and advertisements, and a lot of members were accustomed to those rules and they got changed so that all those new posters that registered around 07 were following a different set of rules than the posters before them. And why did they have to do that? Because those rule changes, for the most part, made sense, even if a lot of people disagreed with them, and eventually people became used to those rules and didn't complain so much about them anymore. Well, usually that is, there is a complaint thread LOL.

When those changes were made, weren't the forums still fairly new, and going through growing pains? Changes are always made at first, and once a "system" works, it sticks.

Yeah, because when nobody was posting at all that was much better:rolleyes:

Seriously get over it, if you want "quality posts" then make "quality posts", instead of hiding in here and pissing and moaning about the new spam rules

I've made quality posts wherever I can find somewhere to make one. The problem is, I'm turned off by most threads after reading 10 posts, that could probably be put together into 1 good post.

most action i've seen this forum get in quite some time..

My intent wasn't to spark a debate, just get it off my chest. After a few people agreed with me, it turned into what it is. I am kind of proud that my thread has lasted, while Shocky's only lasted a few hours.

Yessssssssss.

And I hate this whole "red rep" bad posts thing. Seriously, if you hate it that much skip to the next post and try not to discourage some new poster.

I'm not trying to discourage anyone from posting. I only want them to create better discussion. I've been clear in this. I wouldn't try to fight a rule, that I think is ruining the forum, by ruining the forum. Doesn't make any sense.

Yeah the red rep thing is stupid. People that make bad posts aren't going to give a damn what their rep is. Most good posters don't anyway.

Red rep is about all I can do in my position. That, and have this thread.
 
That was more directed at anyone who was pissing and moaning about the new rule, any one with half a brain cell should be able to figure that out

Well you WERE talking to KB.

Then you red rep me again, when will you ever learn that dissing people over the internet is not cool?
 
Well you WERE talking to KB.

The first line was in response to KBs post, then I but a space before going onto the other line, this was because the next thing I was saying was directed at everyone

Then you red rep me again, when will you ever learn that dissing people over the internet is not cool?

:lmao: the fact that you even bring it up lets me know that it bugs you, and makes me want to do it more often
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top