Strongest Poster in each Section | Page 5 | WrestleZone Forums

Strongest Poster in each Section

To put this in context, I was nominated for poster of the year in that tourney.

JK, M_F rocks.

Anyways... I don't like debating wrestling. I feel like an idiot. In the WZ tourney I used screwball arguments so no one could really attack them.
 
Sly...KB...What are your choices here, since you both tore down everyone else's selections?
 
Sly...KB...What are your choices here, since you both tore down everyone else's selections?
Filling out a list like this would assume me not putting myself in the list.

And since it would not appease my ego in any way, why should I appease the egos of others? Waste of my time.
 
Filling out a list like this would assume me not putting myself in the list.

And since it would not appease my ego in any way, why should I appease the egos of others? Waste of my time.

I didn't include myself on my list...I'm sure there's others that didnt. And, IC did ask for non-mods...So, naturally, you shouldn't list yourself anyway...
 
I didn't include myself on my list...I'm sure there's others that didnt. And, IC did ask for non-mods...So, naturally, you shouldn't list yourself anyway...
That's my point. If it's not self-serving, why should I waste my time?

I thought people knew me better than that.
 
Sly, if there's one posting category you wouldn't win in it would probably be originality.

I guess sticking to your stuff is good.
 
That's my point. If it's not self-serving, why should I waste my time?

I thought people knew me better than that.

I haven't talked to you at length about anything, except the relaxed spam rule, and the Lynn v. R. Steiner match. So, how would I "know you better than that"?
 
Sly, if there's one posting category you wouldn't win in it would probably be originality.

I guess sticking to your stuff is good.
Never saw the point of trying to constantly come up with new arguments. If the arguments you use the first time are good, why change? And if they're not good, why use them?

Changing arguments and changing the way you feel/see things just says that you sucked the first time around. In a debate, originality is dumb. It's like Denny Crane says, "You're always right. Even when you're wrong, you're still right".

Great motto.
 
Not really referencing your non-spam work.
My spam work is great. The problem is so many people don't really understand what the fuck I'm talking about. That's why I get such a laugh.

Like the MSN Messenger thing. People don't really get the subtlety of why I thought it was funny.
 
I won that argument, wouldn't you say now? Or, at least, I was in the right? :)

You sure did. You're single handedly responsible for my hatred of Cena disappearing, and I was probably one of the biggest haters on this forum of t he man. Now, I actually kind of like the guy. His matches still bore me 9 times out of 10, but I no longer feel the need to claw my eyes out everytime he wrestles. Plus that match with RVD at ONS was just epic, a classic.

Begrudgingly, I must admit....John Cena > Bryan Danielson.
 
You People Are Too Nice was great.

A lot of your stuff is just talking about how awesome you are.

I thought they MSN thing was pretty good, but why do you think it's great?


I get sad every time I post something awesome and people either don't get it or the thread dies(I kill threads regularly).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top