It's not just you. I've seen X say this a couple times.
Is it just me or is Gabriel like really adorable?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It's not just you. I've seen X say this a couple times.
Is it just me or is Gabriel like really adorable?
While we're at it, I want to play.
Doing flips doesn't make someone a spot monkey. Back from whence you came, you Wade Barrett loving trollop.
or if he turned heel.......
"So many heels on Raw. Why don't they just turn the whole roster heel?"
Shelley has personality to spare, plenty of technical skills, and great heel instincts. Sabin's heel run wasn't too awful either.It doesn't. But what else do Sabin and Shelly do? No. Seriously. People go about how they are so 'great', but all I see is flips, kicks to the face and the occasional funny dance.
On the other hand, wrestling like video game characters because that's what people want to see is obviously wrong. My mistake for thinking otherwise.
Me and you created it together
You know. Your so anti anti anti, that you actually DONT like Nirvana. Its like the sub cult to the cult.
Same thing with saying WWE is good, and Cena is an excellent wrestler. People dont actually belive it, they just want to look smart. Once something begins to reach a point of mass popularity, it becomes the new cool smart thing to go in the opposite direction.
There's about a bazillion people (okay, waaayyyy exaggerated) on this forum who are TNA fans who think Alex Shelly and Chris Sabin are "real" wrestlers. I can't remember the last time they had a match that had no less than 20 set spots. And what were those set spots? Ok. One of them prolly had a kick to the face, but everything else was flip-tastic.
1.2 or 3.3.. What do you think works better?
You talk as though TNA has earnestly committed itself to that style of wrestling. Silly goose. You fail at logic. Kindly hang yourself using your Wade Barrett blow-up doll. K, thanks.1.2 or 3.3.. What do you think works better?
Someone doesn't understand how a wrestling match works.
You talk as though TNA has earnestly committed itself to that style of wrestling. Silly goose. You fail at logic. Kindly hang yourself using your Wade Barrett blow-up doll. K, thanks.
You just failed at literacy as well. If you want to have a discussion, reply to what I'm actually saying. Okay?Your right about one thing: TNA does fail at logic.
Yeah. How dare I call out the fact that Alex Shelly and Chris Sabin show no emotion, don't play up to the crowd and completely no sell everything like ass munches unless the guy hits them hard enough and forces them to sell.
Points to Sarcy for getting in here with some of the big boys. Nicely done.
Thank you. I am not all about obsessing over Wade Barrett.
And Coco be mad he doesn't understand TNA like the rest of us. haha
I might need to do that thing where I compare Kurt Angle to alleged spot monkies. I'm seriously considering it.
I have a very bored opinion of Kurt Angle in TNA: You've seen one match, you've seen them all.
Some people on here are far too excited by the prospect of Randy Orton putting some stank on that headlock.God I hate the term "spot monkey". So stupid. Everyone is a spot monkey, Kurt Angle and Bret Hart are two of the biggest spot monkeys in the history of professional wrestling but you never hear them called anything other than technical gods because their spots involve mat-wrestling instead of flips.
Does your opinion on him in the WWE differ in any way? 'Cause it really shouldn't.