Should The Undertaker move to Raw?

[wwefan49]

i don't think he need move personally. If HBK isn't swapping shows then Taker won't either. They want one of their two legends on each show, not both. I personally am waiting for Taker to turn heel. It's been a good while since we had a heel Taker and his promos are a lot better than when he's face (well let's face it, he barely ever speaks when he's a face), however we're more likely to see HHH turn heel than Taker.

There are only 2 people on Raw that Taker could fued with and that's HBK again or Jericho who apparently he has never wrestled.

I could see one of two scenarios playing out.

1.) Vickie moves Undertaker to Raw because she doesn't wanna deal with him anymore. He faces HBK at Wrestlemania 25.

2.) He stays on Smackdown and wins the Royal Rumble despite Vickie stacking the odds against him and he faces a heel Triple H at Wrestlemania.

In scenario one she hires help like Big Show or Edge to take out Undertaker. Big Show could work because he wants to show Vickie he deserves a WWE title match and not to be overlooked. Edge would require the feud between him and taker to continue but it would get him in Vickie's good graces again if he doesnt feud with Taker again he might have to go back to Raw. What if Adamle trades Randy Orton for Edge because Orton has unfinished buisiness with Triple H and Edge needs to get away from Vickie. Edge staying on Smackdown would require a last ride match between Undertaker and Edge maybe. I don't think they'd have a casket match or a Buried Alive match with all the deaths recently and Vince wanting to stay PG. But a Hell in a cell match is a much better finish to a feud than a Last Ride Match. The help doesnt work so she just ships him to Raw in time to setup a feud at the Royal Rumble with HBK for a eventual match at Wrestlemania.

In scenario two the beginning of the first scenario plays out but instead of her sending him to Raw she uses the Game Triple H who is heel at this point and they have a Wrestlemania showdown where Undertaker defeats Triple H and wins the WWE title. Prevailing over Vickie Guerrero.

 

[Skileman]

They should have Taker vs HBK at Mania 25. Think about how good the promos would be. They both took eachother out the past 2 rumbles and most importantly...turn HBK heel and have HBK blame taker for his 5 year back injury. How great would that be? Also, the match itself at Mania would be amazing. Im not saying you have to have Michaels be the one to end taker's win streak at mania but you KNOW both of these people would put on one heck of a show...

 

[tehblogger]

Well, since they're going with Show/Taker for Taker's next, I don't see him moving to RAW unless he squashes Show quickly and Vickie, freaking out, moves him to RAW. Where yes, he probably would wind up against Michaels at Mania.

There is an issue of balance here, though. Edge, HHH, and Taker all on the same brand is a bad idea - just as bad Cena and Batista both being on RAW. Something has to give, and I think it will be Edge. He'll turn Joker, move over to RAW and go after Punk.

 

[Canadian Knight]

I think they should not move him. I think that he should have a title run for a few months and then lose it to Big Show. He has been the staple on Smackdown, unfortunately we rarely see him as he seems to get hurt in the storylines way too much. Anyways, I think he can draw better crowds. And when HHH turns heel (because you know he will), Taker will be the best choice to face him.

 

[Richard]

The Undertaker going to RAW wouldn't be the best, you ask why?

1. From what I know about backstage politics, The Undertaker looks out for the younger guys, while Triple H is his own biggest mark and doesn't like to put over younger talent so if The Undertaker leaves, who would stand up and look out for the younger talent?

2. SmackDown's lack in quality main eventers. On RAW there is an abundance of main eventers e.g JBL, Cena, Orton, Batista, Jericho, Kane and Shawn Michaels. SmackDown has Triple H, Jeff Hardy, The Big Show, The Undertaker. If The Undertaker was to leave SmackDown, then I think RAW should have to trade big for him as it would be a big loss for SmackDown to lose the deadman.

wwefan, The Undertaker wouldn't have to move for that to happen. Look at 2005, Shawn was going to SmackDown and Kurt Angle was coming to RAW to attack each other after The Royal Rumble 2005. If they move The Undertaker to RAW, then HBK vs The Undertaker would seem a little more obvious then if out of nowhere at The Royal Rumble, The Undertaker was to knock HBK out of it, then HBK runs back out and throws 'Taker out.

If they have Triple H/'Taker again at WrestleMania like timostag said, I think that would be a waste as we have already seen it happen and I don't think The Undertaker needs to win a world title again at a WrestleMania.

ultimate123, we all got to say that last year, wasn't he at 15th anniversary?